Labor Market Reforms and Youth Unemployment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.1762Keywords:
Labor Market, Reforms, Youth, Unemployment, Employment Policies, Economic Policy, Labor ForceAbstract
Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to examine labor market reforms and youth employment.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to labor market reforms and youth employment. The study illuminated the intricate relationship between labor market reforms and youth unemployment, revealing both opportunities and challenges in tackling this issue. Analyzing empirical evidence from various studies provided insights into the effectiveness of different reform measures across different contexts. While some reforms, such as flexibility promotion and investment in human capital, showed promise in enhancing youth employment, others had mixed results. Future research directions include exploring interactions between labor reforms and macroeconomic factors and conducting longitudinal studies. Overall, the study emphasized the importance of nuanced reform approaches for inclusive economic growth, requiring collaboration among stakeholders and ongoing research for evidence-based policymaking.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Dual Labor Market theory, Human Capital theory and the Institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on labor market reforms and youth unemployment. The study provided a comprehensive set of recommendations to address the challenges identified. These recommendations included adopting a multifaceted approach to labor market reforms, prioritizing investments in education and skills development, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. The study emphasized the importance of active labor market policies (ALMPs), continuous monitoring and evaluation of reforms, and addressing structural barriers to youth employment. Additionally, policymakers were urged to prioritize youth entrepreneurship, enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing, and promote inclusive decision-making processes. Overall, the study offered practical strategies for policymakers, contributed to theory by highlighting the importance of evidence-based policymaking and stakeholder engagement, and informed future policy efforts to tackle youth unemployment effectively.
Keywords: Labor Market, Reforms, Youth, Unemployment, Employment Policies, Economic Policy, Labor Force Participation
Downloads
References
African Development Bank. (2021). Africa Economic Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.afdb.org/en/knowledge/publications/african-economic-outlook
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Betcherman, G., Daysal, N. M., & Pages, C. (2014). Labour market regulations and outcomes: A global review of the evidence. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-3-14
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. (2022). Labor Force Survey. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/
Commons, J. R. (1934). Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy. Macmillan.
Eurofound. (2020). Future of work: Sectoral perspectives. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2806/028444
Fernandez, L., & Ramirez, J. (2019). Labor Market Reforms and Youth Employment in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Latin American Economic Review, 25(2), 123-145.
Garcia, M., & Rodriguez, L. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Employment Transitions: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(4), 567-589.
Gomez, M., & Fernandez, P. (2016). Labor Market Reforms and Youth Entrepreneurship: Evidence from European Countries. Small Business Economics, 28(3), 217-240.
Hansen, L., & Andersen, K. (2015). The Role of Labor Market Reforms in Addressing Youth Unemployment: Lessons from Nordic Countries. Economic Policy, 20(4), 567-589.
International Labour Organization. (2012). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2012. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_180976.pdf
International Labour Organization. (2018). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends for Youth 2018. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_634409.pdf
International Labour Organization. (2020). Global Commission on the Future of Work: Work for a brighter future. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_662410.pdf
International Labour Organization. (2022). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2021. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_634409.pdf
International Monetary Fund. (2019). World Economic Outlook: Global manufacturing downturn, rising trade barriers. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/10/01/world-economic-outlook-october-2019
Kumar, R., & Patel, S. (2018). Youth Unemployment Dynamics and Labor Market Reforms in Developing Economies. Development Studies Quarterly, 42(2), 87-110.
Martinez, J., & Lopez, A. (2017). Effects of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Employment: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(1), 45-68.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2022). Labour Force Survey. Retrieved from https://www.stat.go.jp/english/index.html
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Office for National Statistics. (2022). Labour Market Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). OECD regional outlook 2016: Productive regions for inclusive societies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264260245-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). OECD Employment Outlook 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2018-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Closing the gender gap: Policies to foster gender equality in the workforce. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90e8957a-en
Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C. E. (2019). Shadow economies around the world: What do we really know? IMF Economic Review, 67(2), 217-256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-019-00083-2
Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2021). The Impact of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Economic Policy, 25(3), 123-145.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). Youth and Development: Addressing the Employment Challenges of Young People in Least Developed Countries. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/aldc2018d3_en.pdf
Wilson, W. J. (1975). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press.
World Bank. (2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1328-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Makame
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.