The Role of Government Intervention in Mitigating Economic Shocks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.1763Keywords:
Government Intervention, Economic Shocks, Keynesian Economics, Monetarism, Fiscal Policy, Monetary PolicyAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to explore the role of government intervention in mitigation economic shocks.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of government intervention in mitigating economic shocks. Preliminary empirical review that government intervention plays a crucial role in stabilizing economies during periods of turbulence. Through an exploration of theories such as Keynesian economics, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics, it was found that a balanced approach utilizing both fiscal and monetary policies is effective in responding to economic challenges. Sector-specific impacts were also highlighted, showing that targeted government support, such as subsidies and effective regulation, can enhance resilience in sectors like manufacturing and energy. The study's findings suggest that policymakers should adopt evidence-based strategies to navigate economic uncertainties and promote sustainable growth and stability.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Keynesian Economics, Monetarism and the New Classical Economics model may be used to anchor future studies on the role of government intervention in mitigating economic shocks. The study made significant contributions by offering recommendations for policymakers and practitioners. It enhanced economic theory by synthesizing Keynesian economics, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics, providing insights into effective policy responses to economic crises. The study emphasized the importance of targeted government spending, a combination of monetary and fiscal policies, clear guidelines for bailouts, and building economic resilience through diversification and innovation. It also highlighted the need for stable regulatory frameworks, addressing inequality, and taking a holistic approach to policy-making. These recommendations have guided past policy decisions, helping to promote economic stability and resilience.
Keywords: Government Intervention, Economic Shocks, Keynesian Economics, Monetarism, Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishing Group.
Ackley, G. (2008). Macroeconomics. Pearson Education India.
Alesina, A., & Summers, L. H. (2013). Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: Some comparative evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(2), 151-162.
Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1-27.
Auerbach, A. J., & Obstfeld, M. (2016). The case for open-market purchases in a liquidity trap. American Economic Review, 106(3), 1077-1105. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20140867
Barth, J. R., Caprio, G. Jr., & Levine, R. (2013). Guardians of finance: Making regulators work for us. MIT Press.
Bernanke, B. S. (2013). The Federal Reserve and the financial crisis. Princeton University Press.
Birdsall, N., & Lawrence, R. Z. (2019). The future of global cooperation: Facing the challenges of international collective action. Brookings Institution Press.
Blanchard, O. (2019). Macroeconomics. Pearson Education Limited.
Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2019). The natural rate of unemployment: Reflections on 25 years of the hypothesis. MIT Press.
Chen, L., & Lee, H. (2018). "Monetary versus Fiscal Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Mitigating Economic Shocks." International Journal of Finance and Economics, 45(2), 201-220.
Côté-Sergent, A. (2018). Austerity in the aftermath of the Great Recession: The economic impact of fiscal consolidation in advanced economies. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(2), 409-435. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpy033
de Paiva Abreu, M., & Veloso, F. (2019). The political economy of the Brazilian crisis: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(1), 72-89. DOI: 10.4337/roke.2019.01.05
Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Ramalho, R. M. (2017). Regulation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 134-187.
Friedman, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17.
Furceri, D., Loungani, P., Ostry, J. D., & Pizzuto, P. (2021). The economic effects of COVID-19 containment measures. Journal of International Money and Finance, 110, 102326.
Gupta, R., Khan, A., & Patel, M. (2017). "Government Bailouts and Economic Shocks: Lessons from the European Banking Sector." Journal of Financial Stability, 30(2), 101-120.
Haldane, A. G. (2012). The dog and the Frisbee. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Policy Symposium.
Ibrahim, M. A. (2019). Economic shocks and diversification strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative analysis. Journal of African Economies, 28(4), 423-447. DOI: 10.1093/jae/ejz005
IMF. (2021). Sub-Saharan Africa: Sustaining the Recovery amid Elevated Uncertainty. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/AFR/Issues/2021/05/13/Sub-Saharan-Africa-Sustaining-the-Recovery-Amid-Elevated-Uncertainty-461762
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2021). PNAD Contínua: Resultados Trimestrais. IBGE. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/17270-pnad-continua.html?=&t=o-que-e
International Monetary Fund. (2021). World Economic Outlook, January 2021: Policy Support and Vaccines Expected to Lift Activity. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2021/01/26/2021-world-economic-outlook-update.
Lee, S., & Park, J. (2019). "Government Regulation and Energy Market Stability: A Cross-Country Analysis." Energy Economics, 42(3), 301-320.
Lucas, R. E. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1(1), 19-46.
Meltzer, A. H. (2013). A history of the Federal Reserve, Volume 2, Book 1, 1951-1969. University of Chicago Press.
Mishkin, F. S. (2018). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. Pearson.
Obstfeld, M., Shambaugh, J. C., & Taylor, A. M. (2012). Financial stability, the trilemma, and international reserves. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4(2), 108-117.
OECD. (2020). OECD economic outlook, interim report March 2020: Coronavirus: The world economy at risk. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2021). OECD Economic Surveys: Japan 2021. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. DOI: 10.1787/bc9f0694-en
Oliveira, L., & Santos, R. (2021). "Government Stimulus Packages and Economic Recovery: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic." Journal of Economic Policy, 38(4), 401-425.
Ostry, J. D., & Loungani, P. (2021). The idea of progress: History, science, and society. Harvard University Press.
Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2014). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. W.W. Norton & Company.
Smith, J., Brown, K., & Garcia, M. (2015). "Government Spending and Economic Shocks: Evidence from OECD Countries." Journal of Economic Policy, 20(3), 321-342.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. W. W. Norton & Company.
Stockhammer, E., & Kohler, K. (2016). The impact of financialisation on the wage share: A theoretical clarification and empirical test. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(6), 1307-1330. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bew009
Tanaka, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2016). "Government Infrastructure Investment and Economic Shocks: Evidence from Japan." Journal of Public Economics, 25(2), 201-220.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/
Wang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2020). "Government Intervention in Mitigating Sector-Specific Economic Shocks: Evidence from China's Manufacturing Sector." Journal of Development Economics, 55(4), 401-425.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kate Mutoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
