The Impact of Government Subsidies on Entrepreneurial Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.1764Keywords:
Entrepreneurial Activities, Tailoring Programs, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Regulatory Environment, Inclusive EntrepreneurshipAbstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to look into the impact of government subsidies on entrepreneurial activities.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to government subsidies and entrepreneurial activities. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that government subsidies played a crucial role in stimulating entrepreneurial activities by addressing barriers such as access to finance and technology. However, the effectiveness of subsidies varied depending on factors such as subsidy design and institutional context. While some subsidy programs showed positive outcomes in terms of promoting innovation and economic growth, others faced challenges such as bureaucratic inefficiencies. The study highlighted the importance of tailored subsidy design, transparency, and complementary policies for maximizing the impact of subsidies on entrepreneurship.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Resource Based theory, Agency theory and Institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on the impact of government subsidies on entrepreneurial activities. The study made several recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of government subsidies in promoting entrepreneurship. These recommendations included tailoring subsidy programs to address specific needs, enhancing access to finance, strengthening entrepreneurial ecosystems, improving the regulatory environment, promoting inclusive entrepreneurship, and encouraging innovation and risk-taking. By implementing these recommendations, policymakers aimed to create a supportive environment for entrepreneurs to thrive, foster innovation, and drive economic growth and development.
Keywords: Government Subsidies, Entrepreneurial Activities, Effectiveness, Tailoring Programs, Access to Finance, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Regulatory Environment, Inclusive Entrepreneurship
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). State Capacity and Economic Development: A Network Approach. American Economic Review, 105(8), 2364–2409. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140446
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2019). Competition and innovation: An inverted U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 661–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz005
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bekkers, R., & Homburg, V. (2016). The Myths and Truths of R&D Subsidies: Evidence from Dutch Microdata. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1523–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9444-8
Carpenter, S., & Holmes, M. (2014). The Effect of the Use of Government Grants on the Growth of Entrepreneurial Firms in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12325
Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2018). Examining the Impact of Government Subsidies on High-Tech Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Silicon Valley. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(5–6), 526–550. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2018.1453256
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Africa Report. (2021). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Africa 2020/21 Report. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-africa-report-2020-2021
Gupta, S., & Sharma, A. (2019). The Role of Government Subsidies in Promoting Social Entrepreneurship: Insights from Developing Countries. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 321–345. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1650011
IBGE. (2021). Empresas Novas: Empreendedorismo por necessidade volta a crescer. Retrieved from https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-sala-de-imprensa/2013-agencia-de-noticias/releases/31192-empresas-novas-empreendedorismo-por-necessidade-volta-a-crescer
Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO). (2021). Japanese Startups. Retrieved from https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/why_japan/startup.html
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Johnson, E., & Smith, K. (2017). The Effects of Government Subsidies on Female Entrepreneurship: A Comparative Study of OECD Countries. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(6), 682–705. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12211
Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2013). Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth Since World War II. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 963–1035. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt010
Kauffman Foundation. (2021). Startups See Record Growth in 2020, Nearly 4.4 Million New Business Applications Filed, according to Latest Kauffman Indicators of Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from https://www.kauffman.org/press-releases/startups-see-record-growth-in-2020-nearly-4-4-million-new-business-applications-filed-according-to-latest-kauffman-indicators-of-entrepreneurship
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2016). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.003
Mazzucato, M. (2013). Financing innovation: Creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 1(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00007-8
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2021). Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2021. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/entrepreneurship-at-a-glance-22266941.htm
Patel, R., & Desai, S. (2020). Impact of Agricultural Subsidies on Rural Entrepreneurship: Evidence from India. World Development Perspectives, 18, 100231. DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100231
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press.
Schmid, S., & Müller, A. (2019). The Impact of Government Subsidies on Clean Energy Entrepreneurship: Evidence from European Countries. Energy Policy, 131, 255–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.001
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Entrepreneurial Activities: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Economic Policy, 28(3), 345–367. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02116-3
Wang, J., & Li, M. (2021). Assessing the Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Start-Up Survival: Evidence from the United States. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 493–512. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00214-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sarah Leonard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
