AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE BENEFITS OF REGIONAL INTEGRATION FROM COMESA FOR ZAMBIA

Authors

  • Habeenzu Lennon Jambo Pan African Institute of Governance
  • Fabien Sundjo Pan African Institute of Governance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.351
Abstract views: 436
PDF downloads: 183

Keywords:

Regional Economic Integration, Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment

Abstract

Purpose: The world at large in the last three to four decades has shown greater impetus for regionalism, from Europe’s EU, South America’s MERCOSUR, Southeast Asia’s ASEAN, North America’s NAFTA and Africa’s numerous RECs among which eight are recognized as building blocks for the now AfCFTA among others. While for other parts of the world, the driving force to regionalism may be different, for Africa, Pan Africanism and African Renaissance have been the push forces behind regionalism. This study therefore took interest to look at the benefits of belonging to a REC, with the ultimate objective of empirically investigating the benefits of COMESA’s integration for Zambia’s growth for the period 1975-2017.

Methodology: Using a variable that represented the presence of integration and time series data, the ordinary least squares (OLS) technique was estimated to establish significance and relevance of integration on growth. 

Findings: The findings among others revealed that the variable representing integration had no significant effect on long-run GDP growth, FDI and trade. However, it did have a significant effect on investment. On the other hand, the findings of the analysis of COMESA programmes being implemented in Zambia revealed that Zambia largely benefits from COMESA, citing among others the infrastructure development of four of the five border posts shared by Zambia and its neighbours.

Contributions to theory, policy and practice: The study recommends that Zambia and indeed all COMESA Member States refrain from the use of Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) and Technical Barriers to Trade (TBTs). Additionally, Safeguard Measures must be sought for countries seeking to protect their infant domestic industries and adherence to the NTBs and TBTs resolution framework under COMESA. These if unchecked have a potential of undermining the benefits Member States can obtain from COMESA integration.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Habeenzu Lennon Jambo, Pan African Institute of Governance

Researcher

Fabien Sundjo, Pan African Institute of Governance

Researcher

References

Badinger, H. (2005). Growth Effects of Economic Integration: Evidence from the EU Member States. Review of World Economics, 141 (1), 50-78.

Barro, R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): pp.407-43.

Barro, R. (2003). Determinants of Economic Growth in a Panel of Countries. Annals of Economics and Finance, 4, 231-274.

Barro, R.. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic Growth, 2nd ed. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.

Berthelon, M. (2004). Growth Effects of Regional Integration Agreements. Central bank of chile. Working paper no 278

Chibbabbuka, S. (2008). Chirundu One Stop Border Post Baseline Survey: Interim Report.

Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) Investment Report, 2012. Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment in COMESA.ISBN 978- 9982-26-053-4. October, 2012.

De Melo, J., Montenegro, C. and Panagariya, A. (1992). Regional integration, old and new. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 985

Deutsch, K. (1989). The Analysis of International Relations. 3rd Ed. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall, 1989, pp.270 – 283.

Dunning, J.. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.

Haas, B. (1971). The study of regional integration: Reflection on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing, pp. 3-44 in Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Sheingold (eds), Regional integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Henrekson, M., Torstensson, J. and Torstensson, R. (1995). Growth Effects of European Integration, IUI Working Paper, No. 439

Henrekson, M., Torstensson, J. and Torstensson, R. (1997). Growth effects of European integration. European Economic Review, 41, 1537-1557.

Hungary Chamber of Commerce and Indusrty (2015). Benefits of EU Memebership. Available at: https://www.mkik.hu/en/magyar-kereskedelmi-es-iparkamara/kiadvanyok-8620 (Accessed on 25 February 2019)

IMF. (1993). Balance of Payments Manual. 5th edition

Jessop, B. (2003). ‘The Political Economy of Scale and the Construction of Cross-Border Micro-Regions’, in F. Söderbaum and T. M. Shaw (eds) Theories of New Regionalism: A Palgrave Reader (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

Kamau, N. (2010). The Impact of Regional Integration on Economic Growth. Empirical Evidence for COMESA, EAC and SADC Trade Blocs. American Journal of Social and Management Sciences. 1 (2) pp.150-163

Lakuna, P.., Munu, M., and Shinyekwa, I. (2018). The Effect of Regional Economic Communities on Market Integration and Industrialization: The Case of COMESA. COMESA (Ed). Key Issues in Regional Integration, Vol. 6

Landau, D. (1995). The Contribution of the European Common Market to the Growth of Its Member Countries: An Empirical Test. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 131 (4), 774-782.

Levine, R. and Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review, 82 (4), 942-963.

Lewis W.A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. The Manchester School, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 139-191. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467.1954.tb00021.x

Lodge, J. (1995). (Ed.). The European Community and the Challenge of the Future, 2nd ed. London: Pinter Publishers, 1995, pp.1 –34.

Mann, K. (2015). The EU, a Growth Engine? The Impact of European Integration on Economic Growth in Central Eastern Europe. FIW Working Paper Number 136.

McCarthy, C. (1995). Regional integration: part of the solution or part of the problem? In Ellis, S. ed., Africa Now: People, Policies, and Institutions. London, James Currey/Portsmouth, Heinemann.

McCormick, J. (2008). Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction, 4th ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Meier, G (1995). Economic Growth and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Musengele, B., Othieno, L., and Kapindula, V. (2016). Intra COMESA Trade Potential, Opportunities and Challenges. COMESA(Ed). Key Issues in Regional Integration, Vol. 4

Musengele, B., Kibiru, J. (2018). An Audit of Non-Tariff Barriers in COMESA, Their Causes and Costs. COMESA (Ed). Key Issues in Regional Integration, Vol. 6

Mwale T. (2014). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Zambia (1990-2011). University of Zambia. Lusaka. available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d9fe/cf82b2613d8fcd3837b48eb1fa599717595c.pdf

Nye, J.N. (1971) ‘Comparing common markets: a revised neofunctionalist model’, in L.N. Lindberg and S.A. Scheingold (eds) Regional Integration: Theory and Research (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

OECD. (1996). Detailed Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment. 3rd edition. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2007p4_en.pdf

Ogbeidi, M (2010). Comparative Integration: A Brief Analysis of the European Union (EU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The Journal of International Social Research Volume 3 / 10 Winter 2010

Panagariya, A. and Duttagupta, R. (2001). The ‘gains from Preferential Trade Liberalization in the CGE Models: where do they come from? In S. Lahiri (ed), Regionalism and Globalization: Theory and Practice, London and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan

Penev, S. and Marušić, A. (2014). Attractiveness of East African Community (EAC) for Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Scientific Review Vol. 47, No. 3-4, 35-49.

Puga, D. and Venables, A. (1998). Trading Arrangements and Industrial Development. World Bank Economic Review, 12, pp. 251-270.

Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.

Royal Economic Society. (2014). Economic Benefits from membership of the European Union. Media Briefing. Available at: http://www.res.org.uk/details/mediabrief/6052141/ECONOMIC-BENEFITS-FROM-MEMBERSHIP-OF-THE-EUROPEAN-UNION-New-estimates.html

Schiff, M. and Winters, A. (2003). Regional Integration and Development. Washington: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.

Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1): pp. 65-74.

Teravaninthorn, S., & Raballand, G. (2009). Transport prices and costs in Africa: A review of the main international corridors. Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostics. Working Paper number 14.

Vamvakidis, A. (1999). Regional Integration Arrangements or Broad Liberalization: Which Path Leads to Faster Growth? IMF Staff Papers, 46(1): pp. 42-68.

Vanhoudt, P. (1999). Did the European Unification Induce Economic Growth? In Search of Scale Effects and Persistent Changes. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 135 (2), 193-220.

Venables, A. (2003). Winners and Losers from Regional Integration Agreements. Economic Journal, 113, pp. 747-761.

Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Walz, U. (1997). Dynamic Effects of Economic Integration: A Survey. Open Economies Review, 8(3), pp. 309-326.

Willie, A. and Chikabwi, D. (2018). Impact of Border Delays and Costs on COMESA Cross Border Trade. COMESA (Ed). Key Issues in Regional Integration, Vol 6.

Woolfrey, S. (2017). Understanding COMESA and the East Africa Power Pool. European Centre for Development Policy.

Yamano, T. (2005.) Lecture notes on Advanced Econometrics. Fall semester

Downloads

Published

2021-04-13

How to Cite

Jambo, H. L., & Sundjo, F. (2021). AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE BENEFITS OF REGIONAL INTEGRATION FROM COMESA FOR ZAMBIA. International Journal of Economic Policy, 1(1), 14–41. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.351

Issue

Section

Articles