Semantic Technologies in Knowledge Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ejikm.1750Keywords:
Semantic Technologies, Knowledge Management, Adoption, Digital Literacy, Governance Mechanisms, Collaboration, ExperimentationAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore semantic technologies in knowledge management.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to semantic technologies in knowledge management. Preliminary empirical review revealed that these technologies hold significant potential for enhancing knowledge organization, retrieval, and utilization within organizations. While theoretical benefits were recognized, practical implementation faced challenges such as technical constraints, organizational resistance, and the need for alignment with organizational objectives. Despite these hurdles, the study emphasized the importance of overcoming barriers through comprehensive approaches involving technological solutions, organizational change management, and stakeholder engagement. Overall, the study highlighted the transformative potential of semantic technologies in knowledge management but underscored the necessity of addressing challenges to realize their full benefits.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) theory, Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and Resource-Based View (RBV) theory may be used to anchor future studies on semantic technologies. The study made several recommendations to enhance the adoption and utilization of semantic technologies. It suggested developing standardized ontologies, prioritizing user-centric design principles, and providing ongoing training to improve digital literacy among practitioners. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of governance mechanisms for ensuring data quality, fostering collaborative networks for knowledge sharing, and embracing a culture of experimentation and adaptation. These recommendations aimed to address challenges such as interoperability, usability, and trustworthiness, ultimately enabling organizations to leverage semantic technologies more effectively in their knowledge management practices.
Downloads
References
African Development Bank. (2019). Knowledge Management in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. African Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.afdb.org/
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2016). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. DOI: 10.2307/3250961
Allemang, D., & Hendler, J. (2011). Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (2011). Modern Information Retrieval: The Concepts and Technology behind Search (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
Bizer, C., Heath, T., & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 5(3), 1-22. DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2009081901
Brazilian Association of Knowledge Management. (2020). Knowledge Management Trends in Brazilian Organizations. Brazilian Association of Knowledge Management. Retrieved from https://www.abgc.org.br/
British Standards Institution. (2019). Knowledge Management - Understanding and leveraging your knowledge assets. British Standards Institution. Retrieved from https://www.bsigroup.com/
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The sociological review, 32(S1), 196-233.
Chen, X., & Li, M. (2015). The Impact of Semantic Technologies on Information Retrieval: An Experimental Study. Journal of Information Science, 42(1), 56-71.
Dalkir, K. (2017). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). MIT Press.
Deloitte. (2020). Knowledge Management Market - Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2020 - 2025). Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en.html
Felfernig, A., Lops, P., Di Noia, T., & Stumptner, M. (2018). Personalization in Recommender Systems. Springer.
Garcia, M., & Martinez, L. (2018). Exploring the Role of Semantic Technologies in Enhancing Organizational Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 36(4), 567-582.
Gartner. (2021). Gartner Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2021. Gartner. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/
Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., & Corcho, O. (2014). Ontological Engineering: With examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer Science & Business Media.
Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Japan Productivity Center. (2018). Annual Report on the Survey of Knowledge Management in Japanese Companies. Japan Productivity Center. Retrieved from https://www.jpc-net.jp/
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2019). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Pearson.
Liu, H., & Zhang, Q. (2014). Semantic Technologies for Corporate Knowledge Management: A Case Study of Implementation Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 32(5), 678-693.
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2020). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
Market Research Future. (2021). Semantic technology market research report-Global forecast till 2025. Market Research Future. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/semantic-technology-market-8289
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social studies of science, 14(3), 399-441.
Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2019). Semantic Web Technologies Adoption in Healthcare Knowledge Management: A Case Study Analysis. Journal of Health Informatics, 24(2), 123-138.
Wang, L., & Zhang, S. (2013). Semantic Technologies in Academic Knowledge Management: A Survey of Current Practices and Future Trends. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(3), 321-336.
Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2017). Semantic Technologies for Knowledge Management in Virtual Teams: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Virtual Collaboration, 29(3), 210-225.
Zhang, H., & Li, W. (2016). Semantic Technologies for Legal Knowledge Management: A Comparative Study of Ontology-Based Approaches. Journal of Legal Information Management, 38(2), 189-204.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Charlie Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
