EFFECTIVENESS IN KNOWLEDGE SHARING PRACTICES IN GOVERNMENTAL SERVICE FIRMS: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ejikm.852Keywords:
Knowledge, Knowledge sharing, Knowledge Management, Governmental Services Firms.Abstract
Purpose: Government sector organizations are mainly knowledge-intensive organizations, and to exploit their knowledge, effective knowledge sharing among the different departments is required. We focus on specific characteristics of government sector organizations that increase or limit interdepartmental knowledge sharing. Three types of organization-specific coordination mechanisms directly influence knowledge sharing between departments. Organizations are also characterized by members' social identification and trust, which in the absence of power games are assumed to create a knowledge-sharing context.
Methodology: Data are collected by a questionnaire survey in the government sector. The sample consists of 358 cooperative episodes between departments in more than 90 different government sector organizations. Structural equation modeling reveals the importance of lateral coordination and trust.
Results: The combination of power games and informal coordination seems to be remarkably beneficial for knowledge sharing. Furthermore, compared with other government sector organizations, government institutions have organizational characteristics that are less beneficial for knowledge sharing.
Downloads
References
Adler, Paul S. 2001. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism.Organization Science 12:215–34.
Adler, Paul S., and Seok-Woo Kwon. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27:17–40.
Afonso, Antonio, Ludger Schuknecht, and Vito Tanzi. 2005. Government sector efficiency: An international comparison. Government Choice 123:321–47.
Alvesson, M. 1993. Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies 30:997–1015.
Andrews, Kate, and Brian L. Delahaye. 2000. Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies 73:797–810.
Argote, L. 1982. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly 27:420–34.
Argote, L., P. Ingram, J. M. Levine, and R. L. Moreland. 2000. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
:1–8.
Argote, L., Bill McEvily, and R. Reagans. 2003. Introduction to the special issue on managing knowledge in organizations: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Management Science
(4): 5–8.
Ashforth, Blake E., and Fred Mael. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review 14:20–39.
Ayas, Karen, and Nick Zeniuk. 2001. Project-based learning: Building communities of reflective practitioners. Management Learning 32:61–76.
Bate, S. P., and G. Robert. 2002. Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: Lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales GovernmentAdministration 80:643–33.
Becerra-Fernandez, Irma, and Rajiv Sabherwal. 2001. Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1): 32–55.
Behn, Robert D. 1995. The big questions of government management. Government Administration Review 55:313–24.
Benn, S. I., and G. F. Gaus. 1983. Government and private in social life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Berman Brown, Reva, and Martyn J. Woodland. 1999. Managing knowledge wisely: A case study inorganisational behaviour. Journal of Applied Management Studies 8:175–98.
Birkinshaw, Julian, Robert Nobel, and Jonas Ridderstrale. 2002. Knowledge as a contingency variable:
Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organization Science 13:274–89.
Boyne, George A. 2002. Government and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies 39:97–122.
Bozeman, B. 1987. All organizations are government. London: Jossey-Bass.
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Byrne, Barbara M. 2001. Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications andprogramming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
Cabrera, Angel, and ElisabethCabrera. 2002. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas.Organization Studies 23:687–710.
Ciborra, Claudio U., and Rafael Andreu. 2001. Sharing knowledge across boundaries. Journal of Information Technology 16:73–81.
Constant, D., S. Kiesler, and L. Sproull. 1994. What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research 5:400–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexa Ben
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
