Bridging Disciplines: Enhancing Mathematical Models for Complex Biological Processes through Interdisciplinary Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijbs.3109Keywords:
Mathematical Modeling, Complex Biological Processes, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Knowledge Integration, Communication BarriersAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the role of interdisciplinary insights in enhancing mathematical models of biological processes,
Methodology: Employing a qualitative research approach, fourteen participants—including mathematicians, biologists, and interdisciplinary researchers were engaged through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions.
Findings: Findings highlight the necessity of incorporating domain-specific biological knowledge into mathematical frameworks and emphasize iterative collaboration between disciplines. Participants noted that effective communication and shared conceptual frameworks are vital for bridging gaps between theoretical and empirical perspectives. The study also identifies key challenges, including terminological differences and divergent methodological priorities, which hinder interdisciplinary collaboration.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This research underscores the value of qualitative approaches in understanding the complexities of interdisciplinary work and offers actionable insights to improve mathematical modeling practices. It advocates for fostering interdisciplinary education and developing integrative tools to enhance collaboration.
Downloads
References
Allen, L. J. S. (2007). An introduction to mathematical biology. Pearson.
Allen, L. J. S. (2017). An introduction to mathematical biology. Pearson Education.
Alon, U. (2006). An introduction to systems biology: Design principles of biological circuits. CRC Press.
Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1992). Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control. Oxford University Press
Banda, M. (2021). Research approaches in educational studies: A comprehensive guide. Lusaka University Press.
Banda, S. (2022). Advanced techniques in mixed-methods data analysis for social sciences. Journal of Research Methodology, 15(3), 245–260.
Banga, J. R., & Kötter, P. (2012). Mathematical models in biomedical engineering. Springer.
Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Network science. Cambridge University Press.
Batterman, R. W. (2017). Universality and modeling in the sciences. Philosophy of Science, 84(3), 319–340.
Berg, J., Smith, L., & Thompson, R. (2023). Advances in mathematical modeling for biological systems: Integrating multiscale approaches. Journal of Computational Biology, 30(4), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2023.0015
Bialek, W. (2012). Biophysics: Searching for principles. Princeton University Press.
Bocharov, G., & Zherebtsov, M. (2020). Mathematical modeling of biological systems: From cancer to pandemics. Mathematics in Biology, 72(1), 34–48.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Byrne, H. M. (2010). Dissecting cancer through mathematics: From the cell to the animal model. Nature Reviews Cancer, 10(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2808
Chauhan, R., & Chattopadhyay, J. (2018). Mathematical modeling of tumor–immune interactions. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 76(2), 335–356.
Ching, T., Himmelstein, D. S., Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., et al. (2018). Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(141), 20170387.
Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Davis, J. G., Anderson, C., & Lewis, M. (2020). Modeling the role of glial cells in neurodegeneration. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 492, 110–122.
Deisboeck, T. S., & Stamatakos, G. S. (2011). Multiscale cancer modeling. CRC Press.
Desmond, P. (2014). Mathematical modeling in neurodegenerative diseases: Insights and challenges. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 349, 106–115.
Diekmann, O., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., & Britton, T. (2013). Mathematical tools for understanding infectious disease dynamics. Princeton University Press.
Edelstein-Keshet, L. (2005). Mathematical models in biology. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719147
Endy, D. (2005). Foundations for engineering biology. Nature, 438(7067), 449–453.
Fenton, E., & Gromov, A. (2017). Mathematical models of neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11, 45.
Fitzgerald, P., & Lumb, J. (2018). Mathematical models of neurodegenerative diseases: Applications in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 438, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.012
Gummerum, M., & Leman, P. J. (2011). Developing communication and reasoning skills through argumentation. Educational Psychology Review, 23(3), 401–420.
Ibarra, J. E., & Tompkins, E. (2021). Data-driven approaches to pandemic forecasting: The intersection of machine learning and epidemiology. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 310–320.
Kanyama, P. (2018). Designing educational research: Principles and practices. Copperbelt University Press.
Kapasa, L. (2020). Research instruments in social sciences: Selection and application. African Journal of Social Research, 12(4), 301–315.
Khan, A., Ali, S., & Rehman, M. (2021). Bifurcation analysis of COVID-19 pandemic dynamics with vaccination strategies. Mathematical Biosciences, 338, 108649.
Kissler, S. M., Tedijanto, C., Goldstein, E., Grad, Y. H., & Lipsitch, M. (2020). Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science, 368(6493), 860–868.
Kitano, H. (2002). Systems biology: A brief overview. Science, 295(5560), 1662–1664.
Klenk, N., & Meehan, K. (2017). Climate change research and the humanities. Environmental Humanities, 9(1), 125–148.
Kot, M., & O'Neill, M. (2019). Qualitative models of disease spread: An introduction to system dynamics approaches. Theoretical Biology & Medical Modelling, 16(2), 1–10.
Kou, S. C., & Koutsou, A. (2019). Modeling the dynamics of neurodegenerative diseases: An interdisciplinary approach. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(4), e1006873.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Lagergren, J. H., Chen, T., & Johnson, M. (2020). Physics-informed neural networks for mechanistic insight extraction from sparse biological data. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 123, Article 103888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103888
Lardon, L. A., Merkey, B. V., Martins, S., Dötsch, A., Picioreanu, C., Kreft, J.-U., & Smets, B. F. (2011). iDynoMiCS: Next-generation individual-based modelling of biofilms. Environmental Microbiology, 13(9), 2416–2434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02500.x
Lefebvre, A., & Coffman, L. A. (2020). Modeling pandemics: Lessons learned and future directions. Journal of Biostatistics, 45(3), 375–389.
Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology, 73(6), 1943–1967.
Liu, X., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Computational models of neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 635. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00635
Lubinda, J. (2020). Data analysis techniques for mixed-methods research in education. Zambia Educational Publishing House.
Mackey, M. C., & Kyrychko, Y. N. (2017). Mathematical models of neurodegenerative diseases: From mechanisms to therapy. Mathematical Biosciences, 288, 11–22.
MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2018). Building models in biology and physics: The role of heuristic strategies. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 68, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.001
Mbewe, C. (2022). Ethical considerations in educational research: A Zambian perspective. Zambian Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 45–58.
McGlade, J., & Nettle, D. (2017). Complex systems in biology: Understanding cancer growth through mathematical modeling. Journal of Biological Systems, 25(3), 183–200.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Metzcar, J., Wang, Y., Heiland, R., & Macklin, P. (2019). A review of cell-based computational modeling in cancer biology. Journal of Computational Biology, 26(4), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2019.0155
Migliore, M., & Caruso, G. (2021). Interdisciplinary approaches to Alzheimer’s disease: A mathematical modeling perspective. Mathematical Biosciences, 331, 108552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108552
Mulenga, D. (2022). Sampling techniques in educational research: A practical guide. Journal of Research in Education, 17(3), 210–225.
Murray, J. D. (2002). Mathematical biology I & II. Springer.
Mutale, B. (2021). Innovative approaches to data presentation in social sciences research. Journal of Social Science Research Methods, 13(4), 412–427.
Mwanza, F. (2017). Understanding research populations and sampling in educational studies. Journal of Educational Research Methods, 5(3), 178–190.
Mwila, E. (2023). Systematic approaches to data collection in educational research. International Journal of Research Methodology in Education, 20(1), 67–82.
Nartallo Kaluarachchi, R., Lambiotte, R., & Goriely, A. (2025). From reductionism to realism: Holistic mathematical modelling for complex biological systems.
Ngoma, P. (2019). Sample size determination in educational research: Principles and practices. Zambian Journal of Educational Studies, 11(2), 145–160.
Nichter, M. (2008). Global health: Why cultural perceptions, social representations, and biopolitics matter. University of Arizona Press
Norton, L. (1988). A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth. Cancer Research, 48(24 Part 1), 7067–7071.
O’Neill, P., & Reed, M. (2021). Agent-based models of neurodegenerative diseases: A qualitative approach. Computational Biology and Medicine, 40(4), 50–62.
O’Rourke, M., Crowley, S., Eigenbrode, S. D., & Wulfhorst, J. D. (2016). Philosophy and the practice of interdisciplinary research. Synthese, 193(3), 1011–1034.
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B. W., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.
Orth, J. D., Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010). What is flux balance analysis? Nature Biotechnology, 28(3), 245–248.
Otto, S. P., & Day, T. (2007). A biologist's guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press.
Palmer, M. A., Kramer, J., Boyd, E., et al. (2018). Training the next generation of interdisciplinary scientists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(4), 220–228.
Pellis, L., Scarabel, F., Stage, H. B., et al. (2021). Challenges in control of COVID-19: Short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1829), 20200264.
Reed, M. C., Nijhout, H. F., & Best, J. A. (2010, corrected). Mathematical insights into metabolic systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3), 857–862.
Sengupta, A., & Lee, Y. (2019). Mathematical modeling of neurodegenerative diseases: Applications in Huntington’s. Computational Biology, 26(5), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2018.0257
Siame, M. (2020). Ethical practices in educational research: A guide for researchers. Zambian Educational Research Association.
Sikanyika, B. (2018). Sampling methods in social science research: A practical approach. Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 78–92.
Simonetto, A., & Politi, A. (2020). Mathematical models of protein misfolding and aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases. Biophysical Reviews, 12(3), 533–547.
Simwinga, J. (2019). Data collection procedures in educational research: Best practices and common pitfalls. International Journal of Educational Research Methods, 7(3), 201–215.
Smith, L. M., Johnson, R. T., & Williams, A. B. (2019). Qualitative modeling of tumor dynamics under therapy. Mathematical Models in Biology, 45(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmb.2019.02.003
Steyerberg, E. W., & Harrell, F. E. (2015). Prediction models in medical decision making. Springer.
Stojanovic, J., & Teixeira, J. A. (2020). A review of interdisciplinary approaches to pandemic modeling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), Article 4490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124490
Swanson, K. I., & Venkataraman, S. (2020). Computational models of pandemics: A review. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 56(3), 287–307.
Tao, Y., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Mathematical modeling of cancer and its clinical implications. Biophysical Reviews, 7(2), 177–184.
Thompson, J., Owen, J., [additional authors if any], et al. (2020). Epistemic diversity in interdisciplinary research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 82, 23–34.
Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 237(641), 37–72.
Von Wehrden, H., Abson, D. J., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H., Klein, A. M.,
Lang, D. J., Martens, P., & Walmsley, D. (2019). Researcher identity and collaboration in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 14(6), 1541–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00731-4
West, G. B., & Brown, J. H. (2005). The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology: From genomes to ecosystems—towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 226(1), 110–115.
Zhou, H., & Zhang, W. (2016). Mathematical modeling of neurodegenerative diseases: An interdisciplinary approach. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 63, 57–66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chrispine Mulenga Mwambazi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
