The Effect of Asymmetric Information on the Pricing of Equity Issuance

Authors

  • Mehrnoush Shahhosseini University of San Francisco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijf.901
Abstract views: 164
PDF downloads: 140

Keywords:

Asymmetric Information, Equity Issuance, Brokerage Mergers, Quasi-Natural Experiment

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examined the adverse selection in the market for seasoned equity issuance.

Methodology: The asymmetric information explained the price reduction at the date of equity issuance. In particular, equity issuance tended to follow credible information releases since companies issued equity when the market was the most informed about the quality of their firms. The paper exploited brokerage mergers as a quasi-natural experiment that increased information asymmetry through their effect on the extent of research coverage by sell-side equity analysts.

Findings: The broker mergers unexpectedly terminated brokers operation, and the level of analyst coverage decreased for the firms previously covered by these analysts. This paper showed that the cumulative abnormal return was positive around the date of equity issuance when asymmetric information increased and more substantial for stocks that lost analyst coverage relative to the stocks that never lost any coverage. Moreover, affected companies by the brokerage mergers issued more equity after the events compared to the control group. This paper showed the causal impact of losing analyst coverage on price at the time of equity issuance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mehrnoush Shahhosseini, University of San Francisco

School of Management

References

Asquith, P. and Mullins, D. W. (1986). Equity issues and offering dilution. Journal of Financial Economics, 15:29.

Chen, T., Harford, J., and Lin, C. (2015). Do analysts matter for governance? evidence from natural experiments. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2):383–410.

Derrien, F. and Kecske ́s, A. (2013). The real effects of financial shocks: Evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage: The real effects of financial shocks. The Journal of Finance, 68(4):1407–1440.

Hong, H. and Kacperczyk, M. (2010). Competition and bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, page 43.

Irani, R. M. and Oesch, D. (2013). Monitoring and corporate disclosure: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(2):398–418.

Kelly, B. and Ljungqvist, A. (2012). Testing asymmetric-information asset pricing models.

Review of Financial Studies, 25(5):1366–1413.

Masulis, R. and Korwar, A. (1986). Seasoned equity offerings an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Economics, 15:91–118.

Myers, S. and Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13:187–221.

Schipper, K. and Smith, A. (1986). A comparison of equity carve-outs and seasoned equity offerings share price effects and corporate restructuring. Journal of Financial Economics,

:153–186.

Wu, J. S. and Zang, A. Y. (2009). What determine financial analysts’ career outcomes during mergers? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(1):59–86.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Shahhosseini, M. . (2022). The Effect of Asymmetric Information on the Pricing of Equity Issuance. International Journal of Finance, 7(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijf.901

Issue

Section

Articles