Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Face of Globalization

Authors

  • Edwin Kiarie Catholic University of Eastern Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.2081

Keywords:

Community Involvement, Digital Technologies, Sustainable Tourism, Legal and Policy Frameworks, International Cooperation

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. Preliminary empirical review revealed that globalization presented both opportunities and challenges for cultural heritage preservation. While it facilitated cultural exchange and increased international support, it also led to the commercialization and potential degradation of heritage sites. Economic pressures and urbanization posed significant threats, but community involvement and the use of modern technologies offered innovative solutions. Effective preservation required a balanced approach, integrating sustainable tourism, comprehensive urban planning, and empowered local communities to protect and promote cultural identities amidst global influences.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Cultural Globalization Theory, Social Identity Theory and Cultural Capital Theory may be used to anchor future studies on cultural heritage preservation. The study recommended enhancing community involvement, leveraging digital technologies, promoting sustainable tourism practices, strengthening legal and policy frameworks, encouraging international cooperation, and fostering education and public awareness. These recommendations aimed to ensure the active participation of local communities, utilize digital tools for wider access and documentation, balance the economic benefits of tourism with preservation needs, establish robust legal protections, facilitate international collaboration for shared knowledge and resources, and increase public understanding and appreciation of cultural heritage. These measures were suggested to effectively preserve cultural heritage in the face of globalization's challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anquandah, J. (2016). Heritage management in Ghana: Perspectives and prospects. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739116000089

Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. Verso Books.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.

Cameron, F., & Kenderdine, S. (2016). Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse. MIT Press.

Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Deacon, H., Dondolo, L., Mrubata, M., & Prosalendis, S. (2017). The subtle power of intangible heritage: Legal and financial instruments for safeguarding intangible heritage. HSRC Press.

Giddens, A. (2015). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.

Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical approaches. Routledge.

Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2014). Globalization/anti-globalization: Beyond the great divide. Polity.

Jones, T. (2015). The economics of cultural heritage preservation in the United States. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5(4), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2014-0023

Jones, T., & Silva, C. (2017). Community involvement in cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. Heritage & Society, 10(3), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1345982

Kymlicka, W. (2015). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Clarendon Press.

Labadi, S. (2013). UNESCO, cultural heritage, and outstanding universal value: Value-based analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions. AltaMira Press.

Lenzerini, F. (2013). The culturalization of human rights law. Oxford University Press.

Mkhize, N. (2018). Heritage tourism and economic development in South Africa. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 7(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0078-1

Ndeti, M. (2020). Community involvement in cultural heritage conservation in Kenya. Heritage & Society, 13(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2020.1712118

Okonkwo, E. (2017). Challenges and opportunities in cultural heritage preservation in Nigeria. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 24(3), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.12.003

Pieterse, J. N. (2015). Globalization and culture: Global mélange. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ritzer, G. (2015). Globalization: The essentials. John Wiley & Sons.

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global Modernities (pp. 25-44). Sage.

Robertson, R. (2018). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. Sage.

Silva, C. (2019). Preserving Brazil's cultural heritage: The role of IPHAN. Latin American Perspectives, 46(4), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X19843702

Silva, C. (2019). Preserving Brazil's intangible cultural heritage: The role of globalization. Latin American Perspectives, 46(4), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X19843702

Smith, L. (2016). The impact of globalization on urban cultural heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2015-0015

Smith, L. (2016). Uses of heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737594

Smith, M., Holmes, K., & Edmondson, T. (2017). Heritage funding and public engagement in the UK. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2016.1174301

Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Globalization and its discontents revisited: Anti-globalization in the era of Trump. W.W. Norton & Company.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

Timothy, D. J. (2017). Heritage cuisines: Traditions, identities and tourism. Routledge.

Tomlinson, J. (2019). Cultural imperialism: A critical introduction. Continuum.

UNESCO. (2020). Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/languages-atlas

Vertovec, S. (2016). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024-1054.

Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2018). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1-2), 4-15.

Yamada, K. (2018). Intangible cultural heritage in Japan: Policies and practices. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 13(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1430943

Downloads

Published

2024-07-12

How to Cite

Kiarie, E. (2024). Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Face of Globalization. International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.2081

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.