Environmental Sustainability in Livestock Production

Authors

  • Nolan Smith Rhodes University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1701

Keywords:

Livestock Production, Sustainable Practices, Environmental Sustainability, Policy Support, Consumer Awareness

Abstract

Purpose: The general purpose of this study was to analyze environmental sustainability in livestock production.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to environmental sustainability in livestock production. The study provided valuable insights into the complex interactions between livestock production practices and environmental sustainability, highlighting significant challenges such as greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, biodiversity loss, and land degradation. It emphasized the importance of adopting integrated approaches to mitigate these impacts, stressing the need for transformative changes in livestock production. The study also underscored the role of policy and governance mechanisms in driving sustainable practices and fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration. Urgency was emphasized in addressing environmental sustainability in livestock production to mitigate negative impacts, urging concerted action from governments, industry stakeholders, researchers, and consumers for a sustainable future.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Agroecology theory, Socio-Ecological Systems theory and the Sustainable Livelihoods approach may be used to anchor future studies on environmental sustainability in livestock production. The recommendations advocate for the promotion of sustainable livestock production practices, emphasizing techniques like rotational grazing and integrated pest management to minimize environmental degradation. Investing in research and innovation is crucial to developing new technologies for enhanced sustainability, while education initiatives empower farmers with necessary skills. Policymakers are urged to shape regulations and provide incentives for sustainable practices, with collaboration among stakeholders highlighted as essential for addressing environmental challenges effectively. Raising consumer awareness and promoting sustainable consumption patterns further drive positive change throughout the supply chain. In conclusion, a multifaceted approach integrating innovation, policy, education, and collaboration is essential for achieving environmental sustainability in livestock production, ensuring a balance between conservation and development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahearn, M. C., El-Osta, H. S., & Dewbre, J. (2014). Economic Well-being of Farm Households. Agriculture and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University. Retrieved from https://www.afpc.tamu.edu/research/publications/248/

Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. CRC Press.

BEIS. (2021). Energy consumption in the UK (ECUK) dataset 2021. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-consumption-in-the-uk

Cederberg, C., Flysjö, A., & Henriksson, M. (2017). The implications of using life cycle assessment for energy and carbon footprinting in agri-food systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 14-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.05.002

Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173-204.

Dinh, Q. T., Tu, V. T., & Smits, K. (2020). Nutrient Management Practices for Sustainable Vegetable Production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20(2), 299-317. DOI: 10.1007/s42729-020-00208-1

Dinh, Q. T., Tu, V. T., & Smits, K. (2020). Nutrient management practices for sustainable vegetable production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20(2), 299-317. DOI: 10.1007/s42729-020-00208-1

EIA. (2021). Electric power monthly. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly

EPA. (2021). Air trends: National summary of emissions trends, 2021. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/air-trends

FAO. (2013). Sustainable livestock production: Delivering on the potential. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/i3241e/i3241e.pdf

FAO. (2015). Global agenda for sustainable livestock: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e.pdf

FAO. (2016). Water for sustainable food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6325e.pdf

Folke, C., Pritchard Jr, L., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2002). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society, 7(1), 14.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2019). World Livestock: Transforming the livestock sector through the Sustainable Development Goals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/ca0912en/CA0912EN.pdf

Friggens, N. C., Blanc, F., Berry, D. P., Puillet, L., & Bigeon, J. (2017). Review: Housing and management of dairy cows: Integrating principles and practice from a whole farm perspective. Animal, 11(9), 1442-1454. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117000256

García-Ruiz, A., Cole, J. B., VanRaden, P. M., Wiggans, G. R., Ruiz-López, F. J., & Van Tassell, C. P. (2019). Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(17), 8284-8289. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1817506116

Grace, D., Dominguez-Salas, P., Alonso, S., Fahrion, A. S., Haesler, B., Heilmann, M., & Zinsstag, J. (2018). Food safety metrics relevant to low and middle income countries. Food Control, 87, 92-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.10.029

Havlík, P., Valin, H., Herrero, M., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., Rufino, M. C., & Mosnier, A. (2014). Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3709-3714. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308044111

Herrero, M., Wirsenius, S., Henderson, B., Rigolot, C., Thornton, P., Havlík, P., & Gerber, P. (2015). Livestock and the Environment: What Have We Learned in the Past Decade? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40(1), 177-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-093503

Herrero, M., Wirsenius, S., Henderson, B., Rigolot, C., Thornton, P., Havlík, P., & Gerber, P. (2015). Livestock and the environment: What have we learned in the past decade? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 177-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-093503

INPE. (2021). PRODES: Monitoring deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia by satellite. National Institute for Space Research. Retrieved from http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes

KenGen. (2021). 2020 integrated report. Kenya Electricity Generating Company. Retrieved from https://www.kengen.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/KenGen-Integrated-Report-2020.pdf

Kleinman, P. J. A., Sharpley, A. N., & Weld, J. L. (2012). Assessing Water Quality Impacts from Agriculture: Implications for Livestock Operations. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(3), 1355-1361. DOI: 10.1021/es203804r

METI. (2021). Energy data and modelling center. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Retrieved from https://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/en/category/society/index.html

Miao, L., Liu, X., & Wang, J. (2019). Theoretical research and practical enlightenment of ecological civilization construction. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 392, 32-35. DOI: 10.2991/assreh.k.191017.009

Milchunas, D. G., & Lauenroth, W. K. (2015). Livestock Grazing in Western North American Grasslands: Biotic and Abiotic Processes. Ecological Applications, 25(8), 2413-2425. DOI: 10.1890/14-1843.1

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422.

Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171-196.

Smith, P., & Bustamante, M. (2012). Agricultural Production and Soil Carbon Sequestration: What do we Really Know? Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 33-45. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5010-4_2

Teague, W. R., Apfelbaum, S., Lal, R., Kreuter, U. P., Rowntree, J., Davies, C. A., & Wang, T. (2016). The role of ruminants in reducing agriculture’s carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 68(2), 113A-124A. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.2.113A

Teague, W. R., Apfelbaum, S., Lal, R., Kreuter, U. P., Rowntree, J., Davies, C. A., & Wang, T. (2013). The role of ruminants in reducing agriculture's carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 68(2), 113A-124A. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.2.113A

Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), 503-515.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-19

How to Cite

Smith, N. . (2024). Environmental Sustainability in Livestock Production. International Journal of Livestock Policy, 2(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1701

Issue

Section

Articles