Adoption of Biotechnology in Livestock Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1965Keywords:
Biotechnology, Genetic Engineering, Molecular Markers, Reproductive Technologies, Artificial Insemination (AI)Abstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the adoption of biotechnology in livestock production.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the adoption of biotechnology in livestock production. Preliminary empirical review revealed that the adoption of biotechnology in livestock production offered significant benefits for productivity, animal health, and environmental sustainability. Genetic improvements, disease management, and reproductive technologies were highlighted as key areas where biotechnology had a positive impact. However, the study identified barriers such as high costs, regulatory challenges, and limited access in developing regions. Recommendations included supportive policies, increased investment in research, and capacity-building efforts to enhance the adoption of biotechnology, ultimately aiming to transform livestock systems and contribute to global food security and sustainable development
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Planned Behaviour, Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Technology Acceptance Model may be used to anchor future studies on the adoption of biotechnology in livestock production. The study recommended integrating socio-economic factors into theoretical frameworks, enhancing practical training and capacity-building for farmers, and harmonizing regulatory frameworks to promote biotechnology adoption. It also emphasized public education campaigns to address misconceptions, suggested environmental sustainability practices, and called for ongoing research and innovation. These recommendations aimed to enhance productivity, sustainability, and resilience in the livestock sector, ultimately contributing to global food security and sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ayalew, W., Duncan, A. J., & Tegegne, A. (2016). Biotechnology in livestock production in developing countries: Current and future perspectives. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 18(1), 1-10.
Barański, W., Szymańska, K., & Nowicki, J. (2018). Sexed semen in animal production: A review. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 27(2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/87000/2018
Cheng, M., McCarl, B., & Fei, C. (2022). Climate Change and Livestock Production: A Literature Review. Atmosphere, 13(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010140
Chhabra, V., Kumar, S., & Verma, V. (2015). Biotechnological approaches for waste management in livestock production. Biotechnology Research International, 2015, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/102462
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
de Glanville, W. A., Thomas, L. F., Cook, E. A. J., & Wamae, C. N. (2020). Classification and Characterisation of Livestock Production Systems in Northern Tanzania. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0243625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243625
DEFRA. (2022). Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2021. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/agriculture-in-the-united-kingdom-2021
Escarcha, J. F., Lassa, J. A., & Zander, K. K. (2018). Livestock Under Climate Change: A Systematic Review of Impacts and Adaptation. Climate, 6(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6030054
FAO. (2019). The future of livestock in developing countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/ca8176en/CA8176EN.pdf
FAO. (2021). The State of Food and Agriculture 2021. https://www.fao.org/state-of-food-agriculture/2021/en/
FAO. (2022). Livestock Primary. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL
Goddard, M. E., & Hayes, B. J. (2009). Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(6), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2575
Gupta, A., Singh, P., & Kumar, R. (2017). Impact of biotechnology on livestock disease management in India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(7), 813-820.
Katunguka-Rwakishaya, E. (2015). Adoption of reproductive biotechnologies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 14(5), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2014.14210
Mackay, D. K., & Forsyth, M. A. (2011). The use of recombinant vaccines in veterinary medicine. Vaccine, 29(4), 757-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.024
MAFF. (2021). Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. https://www.maff.go.jp/e/data/stat/index.html
Niemann, H., Kues, W., & Carnwath, J. W. (2014). Perspectives for genetic engineering of livestock. Transgenic Research, 23(5), 635-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9796-1
Patra, A. K. (2012). Dietary phytochemicals and their effects on livestock production and health: A review. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 21(4), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66164/2012
Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2012). Assisted reproductive techniques for livestock improvement: a bird’s eye view. Animal Frontiers, 2(4), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2012-0061
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Silva, J. G., de Lima, J. C., & Soares, A. R. (2018). Socio-economic impacts of biotechnology adoption in livestock production in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science, 47(4), 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902018000400005
USDA. (2020). Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/livestock-and-poultry-world-markets-and-trade
USDA. (2023). Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/livestock-and-poultry-world-markets-and-trade
Van Eenennaam, A. L. (2019). Application of genome editing in farm animals: Cattle. Transgenic Research, 28(2), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00152-3
Wolf, C. A., Tonsor, G. T., & McFadden, J. R. (2016). Dairy farmer policy preferences. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 41(2), 299-317.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Evans Kimutai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
