A Critical Analysis on the Refutation of Innate Ideas in John Locke's Philosophical Thoughts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1082Keywords:
Innate Ideas, Source of Knowledge, EpistemologyAbstract
Epistemology is an attempt to understand the role of knowledge, its origin, development and validity. The scientists, psychologists, educationalists, moral philosophers - all are analyzing the importance of epistemology in the knowledge process. Epistemology is considered one of the branches of knowledge, and it supports logic by emphasizing the interrelation between the two. While explaining the significance of epistemology R.M. Chisholm says that it deals with issues like the distinction between knowledge and true opinion and the relation between conditions of truth and criteria of evidence. Such issues constitute the subject matter of the theory of knowledge. In the history of Western philosophy, the modern period is significant because, during this period, there were two schools of thought regarding the validity of knowledge and emerged. One is Rationalism, and the other is Empiricism. Rationalism emphasizes that the source of knowledge is the reason. However, the Empiricism emphasizes experience as the basis for knowledge. In both movements, namely, rationalism and empiricism, epistemology has been attempting to find the answers to some questions: What do we know? How do we know? What are the sources of knowledge? What is the difference between belief and knowledge? Furthermore, is it possible to get valid knowledge? The prominent empiricist John Locke read the writings of Descartes. He rejected Descartes' innate ideas logically, and he has elaborately explained the source of knowledge, the limit of knowledge, validity of knowledge, and its kinds in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding. His empiricism received much criticism from the latest philosophers because he adapted some philosophical ideas from the pioneers. This article aims to justify whether John Locke's epistemology is neutral by explaining the basic characteristic of empiricism and its critiques. This study as a qualitative approach depends both on the primary as well as secondary sources related to the study as books. This study attempts to understand Locke from a critical standpoint. In the end, an attempt is made to show how Locke's central and bias philosophy has relevance even today.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, R. L. (1969). Cambridge Platonists and Locke on innate ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas, 30(2), 187-202.
Bowler, A. W. (1952). Locke's critique of innate ideas (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University).
Drury, S. B. (1980). John Locke: Natural law and innate ideas. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie, 19(4), 531-545.
Embretson, S. E., & Hershberger, S. L. (1999). The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know. Psychology Press.
Encyclopedia Britannica, Innate ideas. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/innate-idea
Grayling, A. C. (1995). Philosophy: a guide through the subject.
Greenlee, D. (1972). Locke and the controversy over innate ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas, 33(2), 251-264.
Hall, I. (2009). British international thinkers from Hobbes to Namier. Springer.
Harris, E. (1969). Fundamentals of Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Hutton, S., & Brown, S. (1996). Lord Herbert of Cherbury and the Cambridge platonists. British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment, 20-42.
Jackson, F. (1977). Perception: A representative theory. London: Cambridge University press.
Kapstein, M. T. (1987). SELF AND PERSONAL IDENTITY IN INDIAN BUDDHIST SCHOLASTICISM: A PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (ASIA). Brown University.
Lewes, G.H. (2005). The biographical history of Philosophy. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.
Lowe, E.J. (1995). Locke on human understanding. London and New York: Routledge.
Masih, Y. (1992). A critical history of modern Philosophy. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Olscamp, P.J. (1971). An introduction to Philosophy. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
Onwuatuegwu, I. N., & Okafor, M. I. (2020). A Critical Evaluation of John Locke's Denial of Innatism-An Epistemological Approach. Trends in Technical & Scientific Research, 4(3), 67-72.
Rubaia, R. E. (2017). Locke’s Theory of Ideas: A Critical Exposition. Philosophy and Progress, 133-146.
Russell, B. (1927). The problems of Philosophy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Russell, B. (1946). History of Western Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
Sahakian, W.S. (1968). Out line – History of Philosophy. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Schacht, R. (1995). Classical modern Philosophers. London and New York: Routledge
Skirbekk, G. & Gilje, N. (2000). A history of Western thought. London and New York: Routledge.
Stumpf, S.E. (1966). Socrates to Sartre – A history of Philosophy. U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill Book Company
Warburton, N. (1999). Philosophy - The classics. London and New York: Routledge.
Yacouba, C. (2016). Critique of John Locke Objection to the Innate Ideas. Open Journal of Philosophy, 6(4), 302-310.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Richard Mutuku Kioko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
