Exploring the Relationship between Moral Decision-Making and Emotional Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1866Keywords:
Moral Decision-Making, Emotional Intelligence, Education, Leadership, Ethical Dilemmas, Interventions, Stakeholders, CollaborationAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore the relationship between moral decision- making and emotional intelligence.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the relationship between moral decision- making and emotional intelligence. Preliminary empirical review revealed that emotional intelligence significantly influences individuals' ability to make ethically sound decisions, as evidenced by positive correlations between emotional intelligence and various aspects of moral decision-making. It found that individuals with higher emotional intelligence demonstrated superior emotional awareness, regulation, and empathy, enabling them to navigate moral dilemmas more effectively. The study highlighted the practical implications of these findings, suggesting that interventions aimed at enhancing emotional intelligence could promote ethical behavior in educational, organizational, and societal contexts. Overall, the research provided valuable insights into the intricate interplay between emotional intelligence and morality, informing strategies for fostering ethical leadership and social responsibility.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Learning theory, Cognitive Developmental theory and Dual Process theory may be used to anchor future studies on moral decision- making and emotional intelligence. The study offered recommendations that contributed significantly to theory, practice, and policy. It suggested further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between moral decision-making and emotional intelligence. Practical implications included integrating emotional intelligence training into educational curricula and organizational practices, fostering ethical leadership and decision-making. Policy-wise, the study advocated for the integration of emotional intelligence and ethical education initiatives into broader societal frameworks. Collaboration among stakeholders was recommended to design evidence-based interventions promoting moral development and emotional competence, ultimately contributing to positive social change.
Keywords: Moral Decision-Making, Emotional Intelligence, Education, Leadership, Ethical Dilemmas, Interventions, Stakeholders, Collaboration
Downloads
References
Amadiume, I. (2019). African Philosophy, Gender and Ethics. Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brackett, M. A., & Salovey, P. (2006). Measuring emotional intelligence with the Mayer-Salovery-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). Psicothema, 18, 34-41.
Brackett, M. A., & Salovey, P. (2018). Current Research in Emotional Intelligence: Present and Future. Emotion Review, 10(1), 1–6.
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2012). Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Personal, Social, Academic, and Workplace Success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(1), 88–103.
Brown, K., & Stride, P. (2012). Moral reasoning in business: An investigation into the relationship between culture and stage of moral reasoning in a sample of UK managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1295-8
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
Johnson, M. J., Smith, K. L., Brown, A. R., & Jones, T. W. (2018). Individualism and the Extended Moral Circle in International Relations. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1215-1229. DOI: 10.1086/699232
Jordan, P. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2013). Emotional intelligence and leadership in organizations: A meta-analytic test of process mechanisms. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 1-14.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kang, S. K., & Kim, J. K. (2015). The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Ethical Decision Making in College Students. Ethics & Behavior, 25(3), 223–238.
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Lennard, A. C., Barlow, C. A., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). Emotional Intelligence and Moral Reasoning in Young Adults: Does Emotional Awareness Matter? Journal of Moral Education, 48(4), 450–465.
Lopes, P. N., Brackett, M. A., Nezlek, J. B., Schütz, A., Sellin, I., & Salovey, P. (2016). Emotional Intelligence and Social Interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 151–163.
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2016). Emotional Intelligence and Moral Decision Making: The Moderating Role of Socio-Moral Reasoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 249–263.
Okeke, B. I., & Udeagha, R. N. (2020). Cultural Beliefs and Practices in the Niger Delta: Implications for Sustainable Development. International Journal of African Culture, Politics and Sustainability, 1(1), 57-72. DOI: 10.1007/s11111-020-00361-0
Oliveira, F. R., de Oliveira, M. L., & Santos, C. (2018). Cultural influences on moral judgment and behavior: Brazilian and North American students in comparison. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(1), 86-95. DOI: 10.1037/cdp0000205
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
Silva, L., & Santos, C. (2014). Socioeconomic status and moral reasoning: A Brazilian study. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 24(1), 17-23. DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2013.10820620
Smith, A. (2015). The Role of Individual Autonomy in Moral Decision-Making: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 323-337. DOI: 10.1177/0022022114565883
Smith, J., & Jones, R. (2019). Balancing Individual Rights and Social Obligations: A Survey of Moral Decision-Making in the UK. Journal of Moral Psychology, 12(2), 156-170. DOI: 10.1163/2156070X-12341351
Tanaka, K., & Takahashi, Y. (2016). Harmony or freedom? Moral decision-making strategies in Japan and the United States. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(3), 107-115. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00385
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2013). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.
Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2019). The Effects of Leader and Follower Emotional Intelligence on Performance and Attitudes: An Exploratory Study. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 101–113.
Yamamoto, Y., Miura, A., & Takahashi, Y. (2017). The influence of culture on moral decision making: How Japanese and Americans resolve dilemmas. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(4), 563-579. DOI: 10.1177/0022022116684627
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Divine Nyamori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
