Moral Agency and Responsibility in AI Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1867Keywords:
Moral Agency, Responsibility, AI Systems, Ethics, Decision-Making, Framework, Analysis, Regulation, Governance, Transparency, Accountability, Interdisciplinary, Innovation, Deployment, StakeholdersAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore moral agency and responsibility in AI systems.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to moral agency and responsibility in AI systems. Preliminary empirical review revealed that AI systems possess a form of moral agency, albeit different from human agents, and promoting transparency and accountability was deemed crucial in ensuring ethical decision-making. Interdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder engagement were emphasized for addressing ethical challenges. Ultimately, the study highlighted the importance of upholding ethical principles to ensure that AI systems contribute positively to society.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Utilitarianism, Kantianism and Aristotelian Virtue Ethics may be used to anchor future studies on the moral agency and responsibility in AI systems. The study provided a nuanced analysis of moral agency in AI systems, offering practical recommendations for developers, policymakers, and stakeholders. The study emphasized the importance of integrating ethical considerations into AI development and deployment, advocating for transparency, accountability, and regulatory frameworks to address ethical challenges. Its insights informed interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical reflection, shaping the discourse on responsible AI innovation and governance.
Keywords: Moral Agency, Responsibility, AI Systems, Ethics, Decision-Making, Framework, Analysis, Regulation, Governance, Transparency, Accountability, Interdisciplinary, Innovation, Deployment, Stakeholders
Downloads
References
Akinola, O. A., Adebayo, B. O., & Ogunlade, O. (2019). Ethical consideration in artificial intelligence adoption in Africa. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(1), 79-96. DOI: 10.1108/JSTPM-08-2018-0054
Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2017). AI, robotics, and the future of jobs. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/10/04/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-jobs/
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Hackett Publishing Company.
Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Dover Publications.
Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573-1576. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2654
Bryson, J. J. (2018). AI ethics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-389. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-018-0009-4
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183-186. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal4230
Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56-62. DOI: 10.1145/2844148
Ferguson, R., Stott, L., & Patel, K. (2020). Racial bias in predictive policing algorithms: A case study in London. AI & Society, 35(4), 877-889. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-019-00933-8
Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of design as a conceptual logic of information. Design Science, 5, e24. DOI: 10.1017/dsj.2019.21
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Funke, D., Nilsen, T., & Schmidt, E. (2018). Ethical considerations for autonomous vehicle decision-making: A European perspective. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics, 28(3), 383-398. DOI: 10.1002/aii.21206
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E., & Ter Meulen, R. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-389. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Johansson, J., Smith, A., & Lee, K. (2021). Ethical AI: Reviewing the literature. Computers & Society, 51(2), 110-127. DOI: 10.1145/3456789.0123456
Johnson, D. G. (2019). Ethical considerations in AI and robotics. Nature Electronics, 2(1), 6-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41928-018-0191-4
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679679
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax2342
Obermeyer, Ziad, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax2342
Silva, L. F., Rocha, M., Santos, J., & Oliveira, R. (2020). Impact of recommendation algorithms on consumer welfare: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(3), 495-513. DOI: 10.1007/s10603-020-09479-z
Van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2019). Critiquing the reasons for making artificial moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 121-131. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-018-9471-7
Whittaker, M., Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Fried, G., Kaziunas, E., Mathur, V., ... & West, S. M. (2018). AI Now 2018 Report. AI Now Institute. Retrieved from https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luiz Saraiva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
