Ethical Implications of Environmental Policies and Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1868Keywords:
Ethical Implications, Environmental Policies, Sustainability, Environmental Justice, Equity, Community Engagement, Transparency, Accountability, Policy Development, Participatory Governance, Democratic Deliberation, Environmental Inequalities, Ethical Frameworks, Education And Training, International Cooperation, Solidarity, Stakeholders, Decision-Making Processes, Global Environmental ChallengesAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the ethical implications of environmental policies and practices.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the ethical implications of environmental policies and practices. Preliminary empirical review revealed that environmental decision-making is complex, involving trade-offs between competing values. It emphasized the importance of incorporating principles of justice and equity into governance processes, recognizing the disproportionate impact of environmental degradation on marginalized communities. The study identified gaps and shortcomings in current policies, highlighting the need for enhanced accountability and inclusivity. It advocated for a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to environmental governance, involving collaboration across diverse stakeholders to develop more effective and morally defensible strategies for addressing environmental challenges.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Environmental Justice theory, Ethical Decision- Making theory and Sustainability theory may be used to anchor future studies on the ethical implications of environmental policies and practices. The study made several recommendations, contributing to theory, practice, and policy. It recommended integrating ethical frameworks into policy development, strengthening community engagement, promoting environmental justice and equity, enhancing transparency and accountability, implementing ethical education and training, and fostering international cooperation. These recommendations aimed to ensure that environmental policies reflected ethical considerations, empowered communities, addressed systemic inequalities, promoted democratic governance, enhanced ethical awareness, and facilitated collaborative solutions to global environmental challenges.
Keywords: Ethical Implications, Environmental Policies, Sustainability, Environmental Justice, Equity, Community Engagement, Transparency, Accountability, Policy Development, Participatory Governance, Democratic Deliberation, Environmental Inequalities, Ethical Frameworks, Education And Training, International Cooperation, Solidarity, Stakeholders, Decision-Making Processes, Global Environmental Challenges
Downloads
References
Adams, W. M. (2018). The value of valuing nature. Science, 359(6372), 395-396. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar4167
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., Black, R., Dercon, S., Geddes, A., & Thomas, D. S. G. (2019). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. World Development, 122, 12-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.010
Aldrich, D. P., & Sawada, Y. (2015). The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.021
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
Ban, N. C., Frid, A., Reid, M., Edgar, B. L., Ling, S. D., Rocha, J. C., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(10), 1680-1683. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0663-8
Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology. Routledge.
Bickerstaff, K., & Walker, G. (2016). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge.
Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press.
Bullard, R. D. (2018). The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. Sierra Club Books.
CBD. (2014). Global biodiversity outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo4/publication/gbo-4-en.pdf
Chow, L. (2016). Flint water crisis: A catalyst for environmental justice action. Environmental Justice, 9(4), 115-120. DOI: 10.1089/env.2016.0024
Fearnside, P. M. (2017). Amazonian forest loss and the long reach of China’s influence. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 59(1), 4-11. DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2017.1252994
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., & Weidema, B. P. (2019). Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.011
Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values, 20(4), 397-413. DOI: 10.3197/096327111X12997574399668
Gardiner, S. M. (2016). Ethics and global climate change. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/climate-change/
Gibbs, H. K., Munger, J., L'Roe, J., Barreto, P., Pereira, R., Christie, M., Amaral, T., Walker, N. F., & Luiza, M. C. (2015). Brazil's Soy Moratorium. Science, 347(6220), 377-378. DOI: 10.1126/science.1262061
HM Government. (2019). The UK’s legally binding commitment to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-becomes-first-major-economy-to-pass-net-zero-emissions-law
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf
Leach, M., Mearns, R., & Scoones, I. (2012). Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development, 40(1), 175-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.015
Mabon, L., Fraser, I., & Cave, J. (2018). Environmental justice, unconventional energy resources and the politics of extraction on Scotland’s urban fringe. Geoforum, 91, 123-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.006
Matsuo, M. (2017). Fukushima: The politics of compensation and the ethical implications. Japanese Studies, 37(1), 47-62. DOI: 10.1080/10371397.2017.1280118
MEA. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Retrieved from https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2015). Which came first, people or pollution? A review of theory and evidence from longitudinal environmental justice studies. Environmental Research Letters, 10(12), 125011. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125011
Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2015). Which came first, people or pollution? A review of theory and evidence from longitudinal environmental justice studies. Environmental Research Letters, 10(12), 125011. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125011
Nepstad, D., Stickler, C. M., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A. A., Bezerra, T., DiGiano, M., & Nolte, C. (2020). The Amazon tipping point: Last chance for action. Science Advances, 6(49), eabc0026. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc0026
Norton, B. G. (2015). Biodiversity and environmental values: In search of a universal earth ethic. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(6), 1587-1600. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-0875-0
Okereke, C. (2012). Climate justice and the international regime. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(2), 131-143. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.154
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29. DOI: 10.1177/016224390002500101
Sandbrook, C., Fisher, J. A., Holmes, G., & Luque-Lora, R. (2015). The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 44(4), 636-647. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0711-1
Sovacool, B. K., & Valentine, S. V. (2012). The socio-political economy of nuclear energy in Japan after Fukushima. Energy, 46(1), 491-496. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.061
Spash, C. L. (2012). New foundations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 77, 36-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001
Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., & Wilsdon, J. (2013). The new politics of public engagement with science. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 769-781. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct090
Tietenberg, T., & Lewis, L. (2019). Environmental and natural resource economics. Routledge.
Turnhout, E., Bloomfield, B., Hulme, M., Vogel, J., & Wynne, B. (2013). Enabling learning in practice: A process for considering the ecological dimension of landscape restoration. Landscape Ecology, 28(8), 1645-1658. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9915-9
UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
UNDRIP. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf
UNEP. (2019). Africa Adaptation Gap Report 2019. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/africa-adaptation-gap-report-2019
WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elijah Baker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
