Role of Intuition in Philosophical Inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1869Keywords:
Intuition, Philosophical Inquiry, Metacognitive Awareness, Ethical Guidelines, Cognitive Mechanisms, Neural Correlates, Interdisciplinary, Diversity, Inclusivity, Discourse, Responsible, AdvancementAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to examine the role of intuition in philosophical inquiry.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of intuition in philosophical inquiry. Preliminary empirical review revealed that philosophers frequently relied on intuition as a heuristic tool for generating hypotheses and evaluating arguments. The study also highlighted significant cross-cultural variations in the conceptualization and utilization of intuition in philosophical reasoning. Moreover, neuroscientific methods revealed the neural mechanisms underlying intuitive processing during philosophical tasks. Overall, the study deepened our understanding of the complexities of philosophical inquiry and identified avenues for future research to enhance the quality and rigor of philosophical research.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Reflective Equilibrium theory, Foundationalism and Coherentism may be used to anchor future studies on the role of intuition in philosophical inquiry. The study made several recommendations, contributing to theory, practice, and policy. It suggested further exploration into the nature of intuition, including its cognitive mechanisms and neural correlates, and recommended integrating empirical methods into philosophical research. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of cultivating metacognitive awareness among philosophers and promoting ethical guidelines for the responsible use of intuition in research and dissemination. It also advocated for the integration of diverse perspectives and voices in philosophical inquiry to foster inclusivity and enrich discourse. Overall, these recommendations aimed to advance theoretical understanding, inform practical interventions, and guide policy initiatives in the field of philosophical inquiry.
Keywords: Intuition, Philosophical Inquiry, Metacognitive Awareness, Ethical Guidelines, Cognitive Mechanisms, Neural Correlates, Interdisciplinary, Diversity, Inclusivity, Discourse, Responsible, Advancement
Downloads
References
Bakhurst, D. (2017). Intuition in Philosophy. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(2), 395-418.
Bergmann, M. (2014). Intuition: A Fundamental Bridging Construct in the Sciences. Synthese, 191(4), 799-817.
Block, N. (2014). Can Intuitions Deliver Evidence in Cognitive Science? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 5(2), 199-221.
Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2017). Science Unlimited?: The Challenges of Scientism. University of Chicago Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2012). Constructing the World. Oxford University Press.
Chen, L., & Wu, T. (2017). Developmental Trajectory of Intuitive Reasoning in Philosophical Inquiry: A Longitudinal Study. Developmental Psychology, 53(6), 1098-1112.
Evans, J. S. B. (2016). Reasoning: The Adaptive Mind. Psychology Press.
Ferreira, M. C. (2019). Philosophy in Brazil: A Survey. Metaphilosophy, 50(1-2), 209-221. DOI: 10.1111/meta.12358
Garcia, R., & Martinez, L. (2020). Cultural Variability in the Role of Intuition in Philosophical Inquiry. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(2), 245-263.
Gendler, T. S. (2017). Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Gyekye, K. (2018). The African Philosophical Tradition: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 30(2), 127-141. DOI: 10.1080/13696815.2017.1364677
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage.
Hauser, M. D. (2018). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. Harper Perennial.
Hogarth, R. M. (2015). Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making. Psychological Inquiry, 26(4), 217-223.
Jones, W. (2015). Analytic Philosophy in Britain. The Philosophical Quarterly, 65(259), 83-109. DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqu104
Kauffman, S., & Hussey, I. (2016). Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. Basic Books.
Kim, S., & Park, J. (2018). Neural Correlates of Intuitive Reasoning in Philosophical Inquiry: An fMRI Study. Neuroscience Letters, 701, 123-130.
Kind, A. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Routledge.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2015). Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles. Psychological Review, 122(1), 1-22.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Park, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Intuition and Rationality in Philosophical Reasoning: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Philosophical Psychology, 32(4), 489-506.
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 425-432.
Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M. (2014). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1986). Word and Object. MIT Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Russell, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Sinhababu, N. (2017). A Dual Systems Theory of Moral Judgment. Utilitas, 29(3), 330-353.
Smith, A. B. (2018). Trends in American Philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 13(12), e12547. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12547
Smith, K., & Johnson, M. (2022). Emotional Intuition and Moral Reasoning in Philosophical Inquiry: A Mixed-Methods Study. Ethics and Behavior, 32(1), 45-63.
Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment and Agency. Oxford University Press.
Tanaka, Y. (2016). Philosophy in Japan: A Cultural History. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 33(4), 395-416. DOI: 10.1353/hph.2016.0087
Thompson, D. (2018). The Role of Intuition in Philosophical Reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 45(3), 321-339.
Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2021). Expertise and Intuition in Philosophical Reasoning: A Longitudinal Study. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(3), 289-306.
Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Winnie Wang'ombe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
