Integrating Modern Neuroscience with Traditional Philosophical Theories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1873Keywords:
Integrating, Modern Neuroscience, Traditional Philosophical Theories, Interdisciplinary, Dialogue, Collaboration, Ethical Considerations, Education, Terminological Differences, International Collaboration, Critical ThinkingAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of the study was to examine how changes or advancements in modern neuroscience may impact or influence traditional philosophical theories.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to modern neuroscience with traditional philosophical theories. Preliminary empirical review revealed that interdisciplinary collaboration between these fields holds significant potential. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, it was found that while challenges existed, there were also considerable opportunities for integration. The study emphasized the importance of theoretical integration and methodological innovation in advancing understanding at the intersection of neuroscience and philosophy. Practical implications were highlighted for stakeholders, including researchers, educators, policymakers, and the public, with the conclusion suggesting that embracing interdisciplinary perspectives could lead to deeper insights into the nature of the human mind and its philosophical implications.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Dual-Aspect Monism, Embodied Cognition and Enactivism theory may be used to anchor future studies on modern neuroscience with traditional philosophical theories. The study provided recommendations aimed at advancing theory, practice, and policy. Interdisciplinary dialogue and collaboration between neuroscientists and philosophers were fostered to enrich theoretical discussions. Insights from the integration of neuroscience and philosophy were incorporated into educational curricula and training programs, promoting critical thinking skills. Ethical considerations were integrated into neuroscience research through the development of guidelines and regulations. Interdisciplinary research teams were formed to design innovative methodologies, bridging terminological and conceptual differences. Furthermore, international collaboration was encouraged to leverage diverse perspectives and resources.
Keywords: Integrating, Modern Neuroscience, Traditional Philosophical Theories, Interdisciplinary, Dialogue, Collaboration, Ethical Considerations, Education, Terminological Differences, International Collaboration, Critical Thinking
Downloads
References
Chalmers, D. J. (2015). What is this thing called philosophy of language? Routledge.
Chalmers, D. J. (2015). What is this thing called philosophy of language? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715856
Chen, Y., & Wang, Q. (2016). Neuroplasticity and Philosophical Transformation: Exploring the Neural Basis of Mindfulness Practices. Mindfulness and Neuroscience Journal, 23(1), 56-72.
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.
Cohen, R. S. (2015). American philosophy: The basics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118869139
Damásio, A. (2018). The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. Vintage.
Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal. Oxford University Press.
Garcia, A., & Martinez, S. (2020). Neuroethics and Moral Philosophy: Towards an Integrated Framework. Journal of Neuroethics, 17(4), 521-539.
Gillett, C., & Looren de Jong, H. (2016). Neuroscience and Religion: Neurotheology, Neuroaesthetics, and the Arts. Springer.
Greene, J. D. (2014). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin Books.
Gyekye, K. (2015). African philosophical thought: The Akan conceptual scheme. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712862
Illes, J., & Bird, S. J. (2016). Neuroethics: Anticipating the future. Oxford University Press.
Ishida, H. (2017). Philosophy in Japan: A cultural introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119251027
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2013). Principles of neural science (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2017). Neuroaesthetics: Integrating Modern Neuroscience with Aesthetics Philosophy. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(2), 211-229.
Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307-321.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
LeDoux, J. E. (2015). Anxious: Using the brain to understand and treat fear and anxiety. Penguin Books.
Møller, P., & Vesterager, J. D. (2017). Neural plasticity and the empiricist tradition. Synthese, 194(10), 3807-3825.
Northoff, G. (2016). Neuro-philosophy and the healthy mind: Learning from the unwell brain. W. W. Norton & Company.
Patel, R., & Nguyen, H. (2019). Neurophenomenology: Exploring the Intersection of Modern Neuroscience and Phenomenological Philosophy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26(3-4), 128-145.
Pereira, M., & Smith, J. (2015). Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Integration of Modern Neuroscience with Traditional Philosophical Theories. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Neuroscience and Philosophy, 12(3), 345-362.
Poeppel, D., & Embick, D. (2017). The Oxford handbook of neurolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
Rocha, C. A. M. (2018). Brazilian philosophy: Introducing philosophy from Brazil. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147650
Rodriguez, M., & Santos, L. (2021). Neuroexistentialism: A Framework for Understanding the Intersection of Modern Neuroscience and Existential Philosophy. Existential Studies Journal, 38(2), 189-207.
Roskies, A. L. (2016). Neuroscience and free will. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 447-472.
Solomon, R., & Kuhn, T. S. (2017). An Evolutionary Paradigm for International Law: Philosophical Method, David Hume, and the Neuroscience of Agency and Rationality. Springer.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.
Wang, L., & Jones, R. (2018). Neuroexistentialism: Integrating Modern Neuroscience with Existential Philosophy. Neurophilosophy Journal, 25(2), 189-207.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jonathan Sipa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
