Contested Peace and Democratic Futures: International Actors in the South Sudan Conflict

Authors

  • Agunbiade Doyinsola Ph.D. Harry Frank Guggenheim African Fellow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijppa.2982

Keywords:

International Actors, Violent Conflict, Democracy, Democratic Development, South Sudan.

Abstract

The conflict in South Sudan since December 2013 has devastated the lives of the majority of South Sudan people. It has killed tens of thousands, placed nearly a third of the population at risk of famine and ravaged key parts of the country. Against the backdrop of historical and narrative approaches by scholars and practitioners, the roles of international actors and the impact of violent conflict in South Sudan is yet to be contextually situated. While some see the causes of Africa’s problem as economic and linked to poverty, debt and structural adjustment programs from the international financial institutions, political and governance-related factors, others could relate it as the artificially carved African boundaries by which many regard it as a colonial creation that caused frequent confrontations as a form of interstate conflict. The historical trajectory of ethnic divide and political identity in South Sudan brings to fore the germane question of decolonization within the context of democratic values and ideals. This study, ‘roles of international actors and the impact of violent Conflicts on the democratic development in South Sudan: Rethinking the narrative’ is focused on a critique of the roles of international actors in the South Sudan conflict. The argument in this study seeks to advance knowledge with a paradigm shift from the parochial focus on international bodies as solutions to violent conflict situations while situating democracy within the context of decolonization. The study seeks to evaluate the source of recourse and relapse to violent conflict in spite of several conflict resolution and mitigation strategies and attendant impact of violent conflict on the democratic development in South Sudan. The study is exploratory with the use of secondary data and archival materials. The study will use qualitative measures in gathering data as it depends on secondary sources of data collection such as written text, archival materials, journals and online sources. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agunbiade D. (2023). International Actors and the Peace processes in Cote d’Ivoire 1999-2015. PhD Thesis

Beetham, D., Carvalho, E., & Weir, S. (2008). Assessing the quality of democracy: An overview of International IDEA framework (Ed. T. Landman). International IDEA.

Blanchard, L. P. (2016). Conflict in South Sudan and the challenges.

Kwesi, A., & Sarjoh, B. (2010). ECOWAS and conflict prevention in West Africa: Confronting the triple threats. Center on International Cooperation – New York University.

Lipset, S. M. (1963). Political man: The social basis of politics. New York: Anchor Books.

Kuol, L. (2018). Navigating the competing interests of regional actors in South Sudan. Africa Centre for Strategic Studies. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep19226.11

Nasir, M. A. (2014). South Sudan: A nation in trouble. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 2, 5. (ISSN: 2321-2799)

Nye, J. (2010). 5 leadership lessons: Joseph Nye on leadership. Retrieved from www.leadershipnow.com/leadingblog/2010/07/5_leadership_lessons_joseph_ny.html

Owen, G., & Dennis, S. (1994). The CSCE and the process of confidence building. In Confidence building matters (No. 2, pp. 1-20). VERTIC, London.

Porter, E., et al. (2005). Researching conflict in Africa: Insights and experiences. United Nations University Press.

United Nations. (1998). Report of the UN Secretary General on the causes of conflict and the promotion of durable peace and sustainable development in Africa. Africa Recovery.

Renata, D., & Sharon, W. (2006). Armament, disarmament, and international security. In Peacebuilding: The new international focus on Africa. SIPRI.

Stewart, F. (2002). Horizontal inequalities: A neglected dimension of development. Working paper No. 81. Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.

Stimson, H. I. (n.d.). What are confidence building measures? Retrieved from www.stimson.org/cbm/cbmdef.htm

Schellenberg, J. (1996). Conflict resolution: Theory, research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Schelling, T. C., & Ellsberg, D. (2007). The theory of conflict. University du Quebec a Montreal.

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.

Tobias, V. G., Tobias, P., Hendrik, W., & Samuel, A. (2008). Elections in post-conflict countries: Lessons learned from Liberia, Sierra Leone, DR Congo, and Kosovo. Report of a ZIF/KAIPTC.

United Nations General Assembly. (2013). Sixty-eighth session, Agenda item 99(bb): Confidence building measures in the regional and sub-regional context; Report of the General Assembly. UN Publishers.

Zdzislaw, et al. (2007). Tools for building confidence on the Korean Peninsula. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) publication, ETH Zurich.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

How to Cite

Doyinsola, A. (2025). Contested Peace and Democratic Futures: International Actors in the South Sudan Conflict. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 7(2), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijppa.2982

Issue

Section

Articles