E-Procurement and Organizational Performance in the Oil and Gas Industry: The Moderating Role of Technological Capability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.2205Keywords:
E-Procurement, Organizational Performance, Technological CapabilityAbstract
Purpose: The adoption and utilization of information technologies has a strong impact on organizations performance. E-Procurement process is basically intended to maintain a strategic distance from human interface particularly the provider and purchaser communication amid the pre-bidding stage. This study seeks to examine the moderating role of technological capability on the relationship between E-procurement and organizational performance in oil and gas industry.
Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive and exploratory study design. Quantitative approach was adopted to examine and determine the modern phenomenon between the variable: E-procurement, organizational performance and technological capability in the oil and gas industry. Simple random sampling and purposive sampling techniques were used. A sample size of 106 was used. Quantitative data from questionnaires was collected and processed and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 25) for accuracy. Factor analysis and structural equation modelling was run to examine the relationship among the study variables set out in the objectives.
Findings: Findings show moderately significant relationship between e-procurement and organizational performance in the oil and gas industry, which means that as e-procurement increases, organizational performance is also likely to increase. Furthermore, findings show that there is statistically significant moderate relationship between technological capability and organizational performance in the oil and gas industry. The study concluded that, interaction between technological capability and e-procurement does not significantly influence the strength or direction of the relationship between e-procurement and organizational performance.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study recommends that, managers should prioritize developing their technological skills in order to increase organizational performance.
Downloads
References
Adeniyi, O., Ojo, L. D., Idowu, O., A., & Kolawole, S., B., (2020). Compliance with the stipulated procurement process in local governments: A case from a developing nation. International Journal of Procurement Management, 13(5), 678–700.
Alisia, A., R., (2018). The Challenges of e-Procurement Implementation in Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 3, 17 - 25.
Amani, S., (2021). Supporting public procurement from smallholder farmers. Washington DC.
Augustine, A.., Ayuel, R., & Dr. Jane O., (2017). Challenges facing adoption of e-procurement in South Sudan: A case of ministry of finance and planning. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 4, 2(37), 645 - 659.
Barasa, W., P., Prof. Gregory, N., & Mr.Okwaro F., (2017). Effects of E-Procurement on the Organizational Performance of County Governments in Kenya: A Case study of Bungoma County Government. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management, 4(4), 161 - 182.
Bell, M., & Figueiredo, P., N., (2012). Building innovative capabilities in latecomer emerging market firms: some key issues. Innovation Firms Emerging Market Country, 24-109.
Bhandari, P., (2023). What Is Quantitative Research? Definition, Uses & Methods.
Candela, A., & Ulises F., (2022). E-Procurement Practices and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Journal of Procurement & Supply Chain, 6(1), 1-10.
Carren C., Dr Esther W., & Dr Noor I. (2020). Influence of strategic e-procurement practice on performance of devolved systems of government in Kenya. International journal of supply chain management, 5(2), 17-27.
Chen, Y., & Bretschneider, S., & Stritch, J., & Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L., (2021). E-procurement system adoption in local governments: the role of procurement complexity and organizational structure. Public Management Review. 24, 903-925.
Defee C., Williams B., Randall W.,S., & Thomas R., (2010). An inventory of theory in logistics and SCM research. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 21(3), 404- 489.
DeFranzo, S.E. (2011). What’s the Difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research?
Florence Muthoni Ndei, and Morrisson Mutuku, (2021). Electronic Procurement and Performance of Non-Governmental Organizations in Kenya. Empirical Evidence from Pathfinder International, Kenya.” Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 9(2) 71-80. doi: 10.12691/jbms-9-2-3.
Figueiredo, P. N. (2016). Evolution of the short-fiber technological trajectory in Brazil's pulp and paper industry: the role of firm-level innovative capability-building and indigenous institutions. For. Pol. Econ., 64, 1-14.
Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues. Research Policy, 20, 499-514.
Gelderman, C. J., Ghijsen, P., W., T., & Brugman, M., J., (2016). Public procurement and EU tendering directives–explaining non-compliance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7), 702-714.
Githinji, R., M., & Were, S., (2018), Challenges of Implementing E-Procurement in the Ministry of Transport, Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Supply Chain & Procurement, 2(1), 1-13.
Harelimana, J., B., (2018). The Impact of E-Procurement on the Performance of Public Institutions in Rwanda. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 18(2).
Isaac Opoku-Fofie1, Emmanuel Asare-Bediako & Kwame A., (2022). Barriers and Drivers of Electronic Procurement adoption and Firm Performance: The case of Universal Banks in Ghana. Adrri Journal Of Arts And Social Sciences, 19, 3(7).
Kabiru & Njenga. (2019). Anthropological Methods in Curriculum Instruction for Learners in Informal Education for Abagusii of South Western Kenya. Global Journal of Transformative Education, (1)38-45.
Kothari, C.R. (2004) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2nd Edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi.
Laryea, S., & Ibem, E. O., (2016). Patterns of Technological Innovation in the use of e-Procurement in Construction. Journal of information Technology in Construction, 19, 104-125.
Lestari, E. R., & Ardianti, F. L., (2019). Technological capability and business success: The mediating role of innovation Earth and Environmental Science 250. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/250/1/012039.
Lucía M., Margarita F., & Marisa H., (2019). Information technology capability and organizational agility: A study in the Canary Islands hotel industry. Tourism Management Perspectives 33.
Kumar, N., & Ganguly, K. K. (2021). Non-financial e-procurement performance measures: Their interdependence and impact on production cost. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(1), 41–64.
M. Fitz-Oliveira & J., Tello-Gamarra, (2022). Technological trajectory based on micro level technological capability: Evidence from the Brazilian rice industry. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6, 196-215.
Masudin, I., Aprilia, G., D., Nugraha, A., and Restuputri, D.P., (2021). Impact of E-Procurement Adoption on Company Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. Logistics, 5, 16.
Mentzer JT., Stank TP., & Esper TL., (2008). Supply chain management and its relationship to logistics. Marketing, Production, and Operations Management. Journal of Business Logistics. 29(1), 31 - 46.
Munaku D., M., Wycliffe and N., A., (2021). Influence of E-Procurement on the Performance of State Corporations in Kenya. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 7(6), 45-51.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian trade off revisited. Am. Econ. Rev., 72(1), 114-132.
Orodho, A.J. (2009). Elements of Education and Social Sciences Research Methods. Kazezia Publishers, Nairobi.
Oteki, E. B. (2019). Influence of Electronic Procurement Practices on Supply Chain Performance of Sugar Processing Firms in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUATCOHRED).
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis—New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruiz-Navas, S., & Miyazaki, K., (2017). Adapting technological capabilities for world digital business: the case of Netflix. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1-10.
Saad, S., Kunhu, N., & Mohamed, A. (2016). A fuzzy-AHP multi-criteria decision-making model for procurement process. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management (IJLSM), 23(1), 1-24.
Sabai, K., & Theresa C. F Ho, (2018). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science.
Smart, A. (2010). Exploring the business case for e-procurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(3), 181-201.
Suzzy, K., A., (2019). Challenges of E-Procurement Adoption in the Ghana Public Sector: A Survey of in the Ministry of Finance. Scholarly Journal of Arts & Humanities, 1 (7), 44-80.
Teece, D., J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A., (1996). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Ujakpa M., M., R. Arora, Fianko K.S., & Asirifi G. O, (2016). Challenges Of Adoption And Acceptance Of E-Procurement On Supply Chain Management Practices In Multinational Companies In The Oil And Gas Industry. (The Case of Developing Countries - Eni Oil Exploration Company – Ghana).
Vargas, S. M. L., Gonçalo, C. R., & De Souza, Y. S., (2017). Organizational practices required for innovation: a study in an information technology company. Gestao Produçao, 24, 221-235.
Yakubu, S., & Lily, J., A., B., (2020). Technological capability, relational capability and firms’ performance: The role of learning capability. Revista de Gestão, 27(1), 79-98.
Yingwen W., F., G., Yangjian J.,, Jianfeng G.,, & Ying F., (2020). Technological capability, eco-innovation performance, and cooperative R&D strategy in new energy vehicle industry: Evidence from listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriel Asare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.