Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

ROLE OF VENDOR RESPONSIVENESS ON PROCUREMENT PERFORMANCE AMONG GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES IN KENYA

JESCA CHEPNG’ETICH, DR. JOHN ACHUORA

Abstract


Purpose: The main objective of the study was to examine the role of vendor responsiveness on procurement performance among government ministries in Kenya.

Methodology: Descriptive research design was adopted. The study preferred this method because it allowed an in-depth study of the subject. The study used a sample size of 156 procurement staff. Census will be used in this study. Questionnaires were used to collect data. The questionnaires were tested for validity and reliability using 10% of the total sample respondents. Data was analysed through descriptive statistical methods such as means, standard deviation, frequencies and percentage. Inferential analyses were used in relation to correlation analysis and regression analysis to test the relationship between the four explanatory variables and the explained variable. Multiple regression models were used to show the relationship between the predicted variable and the predictor variables.

Results: The findings of the study indicated that delivery time responsiveness, technical requirement responsiveness, financial requirement responsiveness and specifications requirement responsiveness have a positive relationship with procurement performance among government ministries.

Conclusion: Based on the study findings, the study concludes that performance of government ministries can be improved by delivery time requirement responsiveness, technical requirement responsiveness, financial requirement responsiveness and specifications requirement responsiveness.

Policy recommendation: The study recommended that institutions should embrace vendor responsiveness measures so as to improve procurement performance and further researches should to be carried out in other institutions to find out if the same results can be obtained.



This Abstract was viewed 101 times | PDF Article downloaded 40 times

Keywords


delivery time requirement responsiveness, technical requirement responsiveness, financial requirement responsiveness and specifications requirement responsiveness.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abouzeedan, A., & Busler, M. (2012). Information technology (IT) Impact on Performance of Small and Medium-size Enterprises (SMEs) 16th Work Shop. Barcelona, Spain, 2(1), 22-28.

Agaba, E., & Shipman, N. (2010). Public Procurement Reform in Developing Countries: The Ugandan Experience. Boca Raton, FL: Pr Academics Press.

Aitken, J., Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D. (2012). The impact of product life cycle on supply chain strategy. International Journal of Production Economics, 5(2), 127–140.

Akech, J.M. (2014). Development partners and governance of public procurement in Kenya: enhancing democracy in the administration of aid. Int. law Politics, 37(4), 829-868.

Al Awad, M. (2010). “The role of manufacturing in promoting sustainable economic growth in the GCC”, Working paper, Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER), Zayed University, Knowledge Village, Dubai.

Alsaaty, M., & Sawyer, G. (2012). “The competitive advantage of the United States versus China in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries”, Journal of International Business Research, 11(1), 121-131.

Amayi, F.K. (2011). Factors Affecting Procurement in the Public Service: a Case Study of the State Law Office. Eldoret: Moi University.

Andreasen, P. (2012). The Dynamics of Procurement Management: A Complexity Approach. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School [Phd].

Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2014). Managing performance: performance management in action. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Artley, W., & Stroh, S. (2015). The Performance-Based Management Handbook: A Six- Volume Compilation of Techniques and Tools for Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act, 9(3), 2-15.

Awino, B., & Wainaina, G. (2012). “An empirical investigation of supply chain management practices in large private manufacturing firms in Kenya” unpublished PhD thesis. University of Nairobi.

Baldry, D., & Amaratunga, D. (2012). Performance Measurement in Facilities Management and its Relationships with Management Theory and Motivation, Facilities, 20(10), 327-336.

Balogun, M.J. (2013). Performance Management and Agency Governance for Africa Development: The search for common cause on Excellence in the Public Service. UNCEA, Addis Ababa.

Basheka, C., & Bisangabasaija, E. (2010). Determinants of unethical public procurement in local government systems of Uganda: a case study. International Journal of Procurement Managements, 3(1), 91-104.

Belz, C., & Wuensche, M. (2013). “Classification of performance contracting solutions: a managerial typology”, paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Business Market Management.

Cachon, G. (2013). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management. North Holland, Amsterdam, 8(9), 229–339.

Carayannis, E.G., & Popescu, D. (2012). Profiling a Methodology for Economic Growth and Convergence: Learning from the EU e-Procurement Experience for Central and Eastern European Countries, 25(1), 1-14.

Cheung, C.F., Wang, W.M., & Lo, V. (2014). An agent oriented and knowledge based system for strategic e-procurement. Expert Systems, 1(1), 11-19.

Choi, T.Y., & Krause, D. (2012). "The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation". Journal of Operations Management, 2(4), 637-652.

Chris, M., & Adam, D. (2015). "Using SPC to measure a national supermarket chain's suppliers' performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 874–900.

CIPS (2012). How do we measure up? An Introduction to Performance Measurement of the Procurement Profession. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply.

Clemons, E.K., Reddi, S.P., & Row, M.C. (2010). “The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The Move to the Middle Hypothesis,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 9-35.

Cousins, P., & Speckman, R. (2015). Strategic supply and the management of inter- and intra-organizational relationships, Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 9(1), 19-29.

Cox, A. (2014). Understanding buyer and supplier power: a framework for procurement and supply competence. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(2), 8-15.

Danese, P., Romano, P., & Formentini, M. (2013). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Responsiveness: The Moderating Effect of using an International Supplier Network. Transportation Research, 9(1), 125–140.

Dean, M., & Kiu, C. (2012). “Performance monitoring and quality outcomes in contracted services”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(4), 396-413.

Desouza, K.C. (2015). The neglected dimension in strategic sourcing: security, Strategic outsourcing: An international journal, 1(3), 288-292.

Dorward, A. (2010). “The effects of transaction costs, power and risk on contractual arrangements: a conceptual framework for quantitative analysis”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 5(2), 59-73.

Dyer, J.H., & Nobeoka, K. (2011). "Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge- sharing network: the Toyota case", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.

Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2010). Public procurement and innovation. Resurrecting the demand side, Research Policy, 3(6), 949-963.

Evenett, S.J., & Hoekman, B.M. (2014). International disciplines on government procurement: a review of economic analyses and their implications, Centre for Economic Policy Research, 4(3), 24-38.

Fisher, M.L., & Mcclelland, A.S. (2010). "Rocket Science Retailing is Almost Here: Are You Ready?" Harvard Business Review Journal, 8(4), 115-124.

Gianakis, G. (2012). “The promise of public sector performance measurement: anodyne or placebo?” Public Administration Quarterly, 2(6), 34-64.

Golafshani, N. (2014). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607.

Greiling, D. (2011). Performance measurement: a remedy for increasing the efficiency of Public services. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(6), 448-465.

Handfield, B., & Bechtel, C. (2012). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367-382.

Harrison, A., & Hoek, R. (2011). Logistics management and strategy: competing through the supply chain. [rev.] ed. Harlow: Pearson/Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Heinrich, C.J. (2012). Outcomes-based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Rev. 62(6), 712–725.

Holweg, M. (2014). "An Investigation into Supplier Responsiveness". International Journal of Logistics Management, 6(1), 96-119.

Hoole, R. (2015). Five ways to simplify your supply chain, Emerald.

Humphreys, P., Li, W., & Chan, L. (2014). The impact of supplier development on buyer-supplier performance, The International Journal of Management Science, 3(2), 131-143.

James, H., & Faizul, H. (2010). From arms-length to collaborative relationships in the supply chain: An evolutionary process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 3(9), 750-764.

Joash, M., & Peterson, M. (2012). Synergies in African business and management practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 7(1), 39-52.

Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2015). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come, Educational Researcher, 3(7), 14-26.

Kakwezi, P., & Nyeko, S. (2010). Procurement Processes and Performance: Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Procurement Function: Makerere University Press, Kampala.

Kannan, V.R., & Tan, K.C. (2015). Buyer-supplier relationships, The impact of supplier selection and buyer-supplier engagement on relationship and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(10), 755-786.

Kasomo, D. (2014). Research Methods in Humanities and Education, Eldoret; Zapf Chancery.

Kazakhstann, R., & Jakob, S. (2010). Survey Tools for Assessing Performance in Service Delivery. In The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools, edited by François.

Klakegg, O.J., & Williams, T. (2012). “Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation.” Project Management Journal, 3(2), 27-42.

Kombo, D., & Tromp, D. (2010). Proposal and Thesis Writing, an introduction. Nairobi: Pauline Publications Africa.

Kothari, C.R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2Ed, New Age.

Kumar, R., & Markeset, T. (2014). “Development of performance-based service strategies for the oil and gas industry: a case study”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2(2), 4-18.

Kusek, J., & Rist, C. (2014). Ten Steps to a Results-based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for project managers. World Bank Publications.

Larry, H. (2013). Advanced Statistics in Research: Reading, Understanding, and Writing Up Data Analysis Results. Publisher: Shadow Finch Media LLC.

Lazear, E.P. (2010). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346–1361.

Liker, J., & Choi, T. (2015). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard business review on supply chain management.

Malta, V., Schapper, R., Calvo-Gonzale, O., & Berroa, D. (2011). Old Rules, New realities: Are existing public procurement systems addressing current and future needs? Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Paper submission email: info@carijournals.org

This journal follows ISO 9001 management standard and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Copyright © www.carijournals.org