The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) in Campania Region: The Challenges Facing the First Implementation of Experimental Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jap.446Keywords:
Innovation, Knowledge, Co-creationAbstract
Purpose: In this context, the current study aims to carry out an implementation analysis of knowledge network in Campania region, Italy. This region has implemented, using Measure 1, Measure 2 and Measure 16 of Rural Development Plan 2014-2020, an experimental model of AKIS.
Methodology: The methodology was based on a living-lab approach where involved actors have an active role as co-innovators.
Findings: The results give hints to implement, in the last period of the Cap 2014-2020, others experimental AKIS based on the Rural Developments Plans.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The development of new agricultural practices and its spread to obtain more sustainable agriculture has become an important issue for researchers and policy makers. In particular, growing attention is paid to the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS) expression used to describe the whole knowledge exchange system, the ways people and organisations interact within a country or a region. AKIS can include farming practice, businesses, authorities, research and can vary a lot, depending on the country or sector. However, the complexity of the AKIS implemented in Campania region requires particularly effective governance instruments and a continuous monitoring and evaluation processes to elicit innovation needs. Therefore, in the next CAP 2014-2020 measure related to advice (Art. 13 - COM (2018) 392 final) and "˜knowledge transfer and information actions' (Art. 72 - COM (2018) 392 final) should be strategically integrated to implement modern and tailored advisory programmes based on different advisory work approaches to better meet the needs of all parties. This issue needs a testing time useful to better plan policy intervention for the next CAP.
Downloads
References
Arnold, E., Thuriaux, B., (2003). Future direction of innovation policy in Europe. Innovation Paper, 31, 1-9.
Autio, E. and Thomas L., (2014). "˜Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management', in: M. Dodgson, D. Gann and N. Phillips (eds), Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 204-228.
Baumbusch, J. (2010). Semi-structured interviewing in practice-close research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 15(3), 255.
Blee, K. M. and Taylor, V. (2002). Semi-structured interviewing in social movement research. Methods of social movement research, 16, 92-117.
Brunori, G., Barjolle, D., Dockes, A. C., Helmle, S., Ingram, J., Klerkx, L., ... & Tisenkopfs, T. (2013). CAP reform and innovation: the role of learning and innovation networks. EuroChoices, 12(2), 27-33.
Commissione europea, "Europa 2020. Una strategia per una crescita intelligente, sostenibile e inclusiva" (COM(2010) 2020).
Commissione Europea, (2011a), DG AGRI "Common agricultural policy towards 2020. Impact assessment".
Commissione Europea, (2011b), "Proposta di Regolamento del Parlamento europeo che istituisce il programma quadro di ricerca e innovazione (2014-2020) Orizzonte 2020)" COM(2011) 809, 30.11.2011.
Commissione Europea (2011c), "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020, Impact assessment, annex 7, Research and Innovation", SEC(2011) 1153 final/2, 20.10.2011.
De Rosa, M. (Ed.). (2014). Il riposizionamento funzionale dell'agricoltura e il rinnovato ruolo dei servizi di sviluppo agricolo. FrancoAngeli.
Dobrinsky, R. (2019). European Innovation Partnerships: How Successful Have They Been in Promoting Innovation in the EU? (No. 438). wiiw Research Report.
EIP-AGRI (2014). The European innovation partnership "˜"˜agricultural productivity and sustainability'' or EIP-AGRI and the service point. In: Proceedings: Workshop Establishing Operational Groups under Rural Development Programmes.
European Commission (EC) (2012). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition - a reflection paper. Discussion Paper EUSCAR, Brussels.
EU SCAR (2013), Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems towards 2020 - an orientation paper on linking innovation and research, Brussels
EU SCAR (2015). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems towards the future-a foresight paper. Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), Collaborative Working Group AKIS, Brussels.
Hall, A., Mytelka, L., & Oyeyinka, B. (2005). Innovation systems: Implications for agricultural policy and practice.
Hermans, F., Klerkx, L., & Roep, D. (2015). Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(1), 35-54.
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural systems, 118, 65-77.
Klerkx, L., & Materia, V. C. (2015). Co-creazione di innovazione per un'agricoltura sostenibile: recenti esperienze e implicazioni per le politiche europee. AgriRegioniEuropa, 11(42), 27-30.
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural systems, 103(6), 390-400.
Kolehmainen, J., Irvine, J., Stewart, L., Karacsonyi, Z., Szabó, T., Alarinta, J., & Norberg, A. (2016). Quadruple helix, innovation and the knowledge-based development: Lessons from remote, rural and less-favoured regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 23-42.
Knickel, K., Brunori, G., Rand, S., & Proost, J. (2009). Towards a better conceptual framework for innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: from linear models to systemic approaches. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(2), 131-146.
Moschitz, H., Roep, D., Brunori, G., & Tisenkopfs, T. (2015). Learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture: processes of co-evolution, joint reflection and facilitation.
European Parliament and Council (2018), Regulation COM/2018/392 final CAP Strategic Plans, June 2018
Regione Campania (2019). Conferenza Agricola Regionale - ascolto del territorio e primi risultati dei tavoli tematici.
Röling, N. G., & Engel, P. G. H. (1991). The development of the concept of agricultural knowledge and information systems (AKIS): implications for extension.
Torquati, B., Illuminati, R., Cecchini, L., Stella, I., & Concezzi, L. (2015). Analisi strutturale e interpretativa dell'attuazione della Misura 1.2. 4. del Programma di Sviluppo Rurale 2007-2013 in Umbria. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 209-248.
van OOst, I. and Geerling-Eiff, F. (2019). Preparing for future AKIS in Europe. EU.
Vagnozzi, A. (2015). Policies for innovations in the new Rural Development Programs (RDP): the Italian regional experience. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(3), 345-356.
Van Oost, I. (2018). Building the innovation ecosystem for the future. Presentazione tenuta in occasione del seminario "EIP-AGRI: dal progetto del gruppo operativo all'impatto", Spoleto, 17-18.
Zahran, Y., Kassem, H. S., Naba, S. M. and Alotaibi, B. A. (2020). Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Proposed Framework for Strengthening Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in Egypt. Sustainability, 12(12), 5131.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Laura Mirra, Nicola Caputo, Ferdinando Gandolfi, Concetta Menna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
