Influence of Gender Stereotypes in Hiring Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jas.1851Keywords:
Gender Bias, Hiring Decisions, Stem Fields, Diversity, Inclusion, Structural Changes, Blind Recruitment, Organizational Culture, Awareness, Systemic Barriers, EquityAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of gender stereotypes in hiring decisions.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the influence of gender stereotypes in hiring decisions. Preliminary empirical review revealed that gender bias significantly influenced hiring processes, favoring male candidates over equally qualified female candidates. Through an analysis of empirical evidence from various studies conducted by scholars, it was evident that gender stereotypes intersected with other forms of discrimination, such as racial or ethnic bias, exacerbating disparities in employment opportunities, particularly for women of color. Despite increasing awareness of the importance of diversity, gender bias persisted, hindering progress towards gender parity in the workplace. Recommendations included implementing blind recruitment processes and diversity training to address bias and promote transparency in hiring practices, facilitating the creation of more equitable and inclusive workplaces.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Role Theory, Ambivalent Sexism theory and Intersectionality theory may be used to anchor future studies on influence of gender stereotypes in hiring decisions. The study provided several recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy. It emphasized the need to raise awareness of gender bias, suggested implementing structural changes like blind recruitment, advocated for diversity and inclusion initiatives, highlighted the role of organizational culture, and called for the involvement of policymakers in addressing systemic barriers. These recommendations aimed to promote fairness, equity, and diversity in employment practices within STEM and beyond, contributing to theoretical understanding, informing practical strategies, and shaping policy interventions.
Downloads
References
African Union. (2004). Solemn Declaration on Gender Equality in Africa. Retrieved from https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/29133-doc-solemn_declaration_on_gender_equality_in_africa.pdf
Araki, M., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2019). Recruitment and selection: The case for gender diversity in Japanese companies. In D. L. Shapiro & P. R. Sparrow (Eds.), Handbook of research on comparative human resource management (pp. 241-256). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bertrand, M., & Duflo, E. (2017). Field experiments on discrimination. In M. Banerjee & E. Duflo (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Field Experiments (Vol. 1, pp. 309-393). Elsevier.
Bohnet, I., & van Geen, A. (2015). Blind recruitment to increase diversity among university faculty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(17), 15878-15883.
Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Tcherneva, V. (2020). Gender differences in career progression: Evidence from Britain. Labour Economics, 67, 101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101883
Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2020). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 85(1), 116-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419897659
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2012). Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 90(9), 63-71.
Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and Leadership in a Changing World. American Psychologist, 65(3), 216-224.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512.
Gorman, E. H., & Kmec, J. A. (2019). Endorsing flexibility: The effects of gender culture on hiring decisions in a professional services firm. Work and Occupations, 46(3), 297-328.
Herring, C. (2013). Does diversity pay? Gender, race, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208-224.
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1678-1712.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. (2020). White Paper on Gender Equality 2020. Retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000600543.pdf
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Ozodiegwu, I. D., & Ochonma, O. C. (2019). Gender bias in hiring decisions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 34(1/2), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2017-0121
Ruiz, J. M., & Steinberg, L. (2020). Gender bias in hiring decisions among healthcare professionals: A mixed-methods study. Health Services Research, 55(3), 400-413.
Schneider, M. S., Couto, M. T., & Ribeiro, E. (2019). Gender diversity in corporate leadership in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3501-y
World Bank Group. (2021). Women, business, and the law 2021. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35023
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Johnson Emeka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
