The Role of Religion in Shaping Social Attitudes towards LGBTQ+ Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jas.1855Keywords:
Religion, Social Attitudes, LGBTQ Rights, Intersectionality, Dialogue, Advocacy, Inclusion, Acceptance, Discrimination, Equality, Religious Freedom, MediaAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the role of religion in shaping social attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of religion in shaping social attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights. Preliminary empirical review revealed that religious beliefs significantly influenced individuals' perceptions and attitudes towards LGBTQ+ individuals and their rights. It found that conservative religious denominations often held negative views towards LGBTQ+ individuals, while more liberal traditions embraced inclusivity and equality. Religious institutions and leaders played a significant role in shaping public discourse and policy debates surrounding LGBTQ+ rights, with varying degrees of support or opposition. The study also highlighted the intersectionality of religion with other social dimensions, such as race and socio-economic status, in shaping attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights. Overall, the findings underscored the complexities of the relationship between religion and social attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights and emphasized the importance of fostering dialogue, education, and advocacy to promote greater acceptance and inclusion.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Identity theory, Social Learning theory and Cognitive Dissonance theory may be used to anchor future studies on role of religion in shaping social attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights. The study made several recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy. It suggested further research to advance theoretical frameworks that elucidate the complex interplay between religion and attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights, emphasizing the need for intersectional analyses. In practice, the study recommended promoting dialogue, education, and advocacy within religious communities to foster greater understanding and acceptance of LGBTQ+ individuals. From a policy perspective, it underscored the importance of legislative initiatives that protect LGBTQ+ rights while respecting religious freedom, as well as targeted interventions and support services tailored to the unique needs of LGBTQ+ individuals within religious contexts. Additionally, the study emphasized leveraging media and communication channels to promote positive portrayals of LGBTQ+ individuals and amplify their voices within religious communities. Overall, the recommendations provided a comprehensive framework for advancing acceptance, inclusion, and equality for LGBTQ+ individuals within religious settings and society.
Downloads
References
Balmer, R. (2014). The agency of individuals in shaping American religion. Religion, 44(2), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2014.901454
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Cadge, W. (2020). Religion as social institution. In K. A. Johnson & A. Nadal (Eds.), Encyclopedia of racism in American society (Vol. 3, pp. 1235-1242). Sage.
Dentsu Diversity Lab. (2020). Research on attitudes towards sexual minorities. Dentsu.
Edgell, P., & Landolt, K. (2021). Religion, sexual orientation, and the politics of law and social policy. Sociology Compass, 15(1), e12874. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12874
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., & Tadlock, B. L. (2020). Contextual determinants of LGBT hate crimes: Economic insecurity, anti-LGBT prejudice, and the civic opportunity gap. Social Science Research, 90, 102463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102463
Flores, A.R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., & Tadlock, B. L. (2016). Contextual determinants of LGBT hate crimes: Economic insecurity, anti-LGBT prejudice, and the civic opportunity gap. Social Science Research, 90, 102463.
Gill, A., & Funk, C. (2012). Religion and attitudes toward same-sex marriage: A panel analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 364-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs027
Gill, A., & Funk, C. (2014). Religion and attitudes toward same-sex marriage: An exploration of denominational and demographic factors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 364-378.
Grupo Gay da Bahia. (2020). Relatório Anual 2020. Grupo Gay da Bahia.
Hickson, F., & Weatherburn, P. (2012). Binge drinking and sex among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 16(4), 1243-1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9966-8
Human Rights Watch. (2021). World Report 2021: Events of 2020. Human Rights Watch.
Laycock, J. D. (2020). Sexual orientation and religious freedom: Competing claims in the United States. In K. A. Johnson & A. Nadal (Eds.), Encyclopedia of racism in American society (Vol. 3, pp. 1235-1242). Sage.
Lloyd, C. (2019). Intergenerational Attitude Changes toward Homosexuality in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 828-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12360
Pargament, K. I. (2013). Religion: On the chain of human and divine connections. APA Press.
Pew Research Center. (2018). The religious typology: A new way to categorize Americans by religion. Pew Research Center.
Pew Research Center. (2019). In Western European countries with church taxes, support for the tradition remains strong. Pew Research Center.
Pew Research Center. (2020). Evangelical approval of Trump remains high, but other religious groups are less supportive. Pew Research Center.
Pew Research Center. (2021). Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage. Pew Research Center.
Smith, J. Z. (2017). To take place: Toward theory in ritual. University of Chicago Press.
Stokes, C. E., & Regnerus, M. D. (2018). Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female homosexuality: The global divide. Sociological Forum, 35(3), 711-730.
Stokes, C. E., & Regnerus, M. D. (2020). Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female homosexuality: The global divide. Sociological Forum, 35(3), 711-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12610
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.
Yip, A. K. T., & Lee, J. K. P. (2019). Religion and sexual orientation: Comparing attitudes toward homosexuality among Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, and Muslims in Hong Kong. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 59(2), 260-275.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Louis Kim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
