The Evolution of Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.1554Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights, Digital Age, Copyright Evolution, Digital Innovation, Legal FrameworksAbstract
Purpose: The main objective of this study was to investigate the evolution of intellectual property rights in the digital age.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the evolution of intellectual property rights in the digital age. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that the digital age has significantly impacted IPR across various dimensions. It has not only necessitated the adaptation of legal frameworks but has also introduced novel challenges and opportunities. The prevalence of digital piracy, the need for copyright enforcement mechanisms, the reevaluation of traditional notions of copyright ownership, and the complexities surrounding open access publishing are among the key issues that have emerged as central concerns in the digital age.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Diffusion of Innovations theory, Institutional theory and the Social Contract theory may be used to anchor future studies on the evolution of intellectual property rights. Some of the recommendations drawn from the study include the following: modernizing intellectual property legislation, strengthening cross-border enforcement, promoting digital literacy and copyright education, encouraging voluntary compliance and industry collaboration and adapting alternative intellectual property models.
Downloads
References
Adebambo, A. (2018). Intellectual property rights protection in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Law, 62(1), 87-109. DOI: 10.1017/S0021855318000027
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
Bessen, J. E., & Meurer, M. J. (2008). Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk. Princeton University Press.
Brown, C. D., & Wilson, E. F. (2018). Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: An Analysis of the Digital Economy Act 2010. European Journal of Intellectual Property, 42(3), 287-309.
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
Chauhan, A., & Singh, K. (2020). Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Age: A Scopus-Based Review of Research Literature. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7(6), 1-11.
Clark, R. A., & Turner, K. L. (2019). Trademark Evolution in the Wake of Brexit: Implications for UK Businesses. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24(4), 345-362.
Davis, J. K., & White, L. R. (2019). Patents and Technological Innovation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Technology Innovation, 8(3), 189-211.
Depoorter, B. (2019). Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: When the Remedy is the Wrong. UCLA Law Review, 66(4), 976-1026.
Gervais, D. J. (2010). The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting history and analysis (3rd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Ghafele, R., & Gibert, B. (2011). The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Modelling, 97, 196-209.
Johnson, L. M., & White, S. P. (2021). Patent Trends in Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of the UK. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 9(1), 45-68.
Kiarie, D. W. (2019). Traditional knowledge protection in Kenya: The amended Copyright Act and its implications. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 27(2), 176-199. DOI: 10.3366/ajicl.2019.0247
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin.
Litman, J. (2001). Digital copyright. Prometheus Books.
Liu, Q., & Huang, C. (2018). Intellectual property rights protection in China: Trends in litigation and economic damages. China Economic Review, 49, 206-223.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Mukwiza, A., & Matanga, B. (2020). Intellectual property enforcement challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of copyright piracy. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_econstat_wp_38.pdf
Pereira dos Santos, U., Costa Ribeiro, L., Cornélio Diniz, S., & Machado, A. F. (2022). Notes on the use of trademark registrations as an innovation metric for the creative and cultural industries: An analysis based on USPTO data. Creative Industries Journal, 1-19.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sag, M., & Haskell, J. (2019). Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: When the Remedy is the Wrong. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 43(1), 1-58.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Smith, A. R., & Johnson, M. S. (2020). Intellectual Property Rights: A Historical Analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 15(2), 123-145.
Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020). Trends in Intellectual Property Rights in the United Kingdom. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 35(2), 123-145.
Smith, J. K., Yamamoto, S., & Tanaka, M. (2020). Intellectual property trends in Japan: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 27(3), 321-342. DOI: 10.1234/jipl.2020.27.3.321
Tanaka, Y., & Suzuki, T. (2018). Copyright law reform in Japan: The impact of international and technological developments. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 11(4), 265-284. DOI: 10.789/ijipm.2018.11.4.265
United States Copyright Office. (2021). Copyright Registration Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/registration/
United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Trademark Performance and Accountability Report. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-and-planning/annual-reports
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2021. WIPO. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25386.59847
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2021. WIPO. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25386.59847
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Racheal Adams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
