The Impact of Data Privacy Laws on Digital Marketing Practices

Authors

  • Kotch Obudho Kenyatta University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.2155

Keywords:

Data Privacy Laws, Digital Marketing Practices, Consumer Trust, Compliance, Privacy- Enhancing Technologies

Abstract

Purpose: The general study focused on investigating the impact of data privacy laws on digital marketing practices.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the impact of data privacy laws on digital marketing practices. Preliminary empirical review revealed that privacy laws such as GDPR, CCPA, APPI, and LGPD significantly transformed digital marketing practices, necessitating a shift towards more ethical and transparent data handling. These regulations increased compliance costs and administrative burdens but also improved data security and consumer trust. Companies that proactively adapted to these regulations by investing in robust data protection measures experienced enhanced consumer engagement and brand loyalty. The study highlighted the critical role of privacy-enhancing technologies in facilitating compliance and maintaining effective marketing strategies. Overall, the impact of data privacy laws was profound, requiring ongoing adaptation and innovation in digital marketing practices to balance regulatory compliance with consumer trust.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Institutional Theory and Technology Acceptance Model (ATM) may be used to anchor future studies on data privacy laws. The study recommended several strategies for advancing the understanding and implementation of data privacy laws in digital marketing. It suggested that future research should explore the relationship between data privacy regulations and consumer behavior to develop effective marketing strategies. Businesses were advised to adopt proactive compliance measures, invest in data protection technologies, and educate consumers about their privacy rights. Policymakers were encouraged to develop balanced regulations through stakeholder collaboration and to harmonize international data privacy standards. The study also emphasized the importance of promoting privacy-enhancing technologies through public-private partnerships and government incentives to safeguard consumer data while supporting marketing innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2016). The role of privacy assurance mechanisms in building trust and the moderating role of privacy concern. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(6), 597-618. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0026-4

Cavoukian, A. (2014). Privacy by design: The 7 foundational principles. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2754048

Chikweche, T., & Fletcher, R. (2012). Undertaking research at the bottom of the pyramid using qualitative methods: From theoretical considerations to practical realities. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15(3), 242-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211231978

Cisco. (2020). Consumer Privacy Survey: Consumer Attitudes about Data Privacy. Retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/trust-center/docs/cisco-consumer-privacy-survey-2020.pdf

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

de Andrade, N. N. G. (2018). The General Data Protection Law in Brazil: GDPR benchmarking and strategic overview. International Data Privacy Law, 8(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx024

Dehghani, M., & Tumer, M. (2015). A research on effectiveness of Facebook advertising on enhancing purchase intention of consumers. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 597-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.051

Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Liu-Thompkins, Y., & Wiertz, C. (2013). Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.004

Hartemo, M. (2016). Email marketing in the era of the empowered consumer. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(3), 212-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-06-2015-0040

Holliman, G., & Rowley, J. (2014). Business to business digital content marketing: marketers’ perceptions of best practice. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(4), 269-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2014-0013

Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. J. Z. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: What it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501

Hsieh, Y. P., & Tseng, T. H. (2017). Exploring social media marketing strategies and building brand equity through video marketing. Journal of Business Research, 78, 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.014

Kobayashi, M., & Takeda, Y. (2017). Japan’s amended Act on the Protection of Personal Information: Strengthening privacy protections. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(4), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.008

Kobayashi, M., & Takeda, Y. (2017). Japan’s amended Act on the Protection of Personal Information: Strengthening privacy protections. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(4), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.008

Kshetri, N. (2014). Big data's impact on privacy, security and consumer welfare. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 1134-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.10.002

Kumar, V., & Mirchandani, D. A. (2012). Increasing the ROI of social media marketing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2098078

Martin, K., Borah, A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2017). Data privacy: Effects on customer and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0497

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Mpinganjira, M. (2018). Precursors of trust in virtual health communities: A hierarchical investigation. Information & Management, 55(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.03.003

Okazaki, S., & Taylor, C. R. (2013). Social media and international advertising: theoretical challenges and future directions. International Marketing Review, 30(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311298573

Pistorius, T. (2020). POPIA: A detailed analysis of South Africa’s data privacy law. South African Journal of Information and Communication, 17(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/26158

Roth, K., & Lucian, L. (2018). The California Consumer Privacy Act: What you need to know. Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, 2(3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3296880

Tikkinen-Piri, C., Rohunen, A., & Markkula, J. (2018). EU GDPR implementation: Experiences and insights from the healthcare sector. Computers & Security, 77, 362-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.02.002

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Obudho, K. (2024). The Impact of Data Privacy Laws on Digital Marketing Practices. Journal of Modern Law and Policy, 4(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.2155

Issue

Section

Articles