The Evolution of Employment Law in the Gig Economy

Authors

  • Kirabo Anan The University of Nairobi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.2160

Keywords:

Gig Economy, Employment Law, Hybrid Employment Models, Legal Classifications, Regulatory Frameworks

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore the evolution of employment law in the gig economy.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the evolution of employment law in the gig economy. Preliminary empirical review revealed that traditional employment laws were insufficient for addressing the unique needs of gig workers, who face significant gaps in legal protections and benefits. The rise of gig work exposed flaws in existing legal frameworks, which were designed for permanent, full-time employment and fail to accommodate the flexible and often precarious nature of gig jobs. It was determined that existing laws needed substantial reform to better protect gig workers while maintaining the flexibility that defines gig work, emphasizing the need for updated legal frameworks that reflect the realities of modern employment.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Precarious Work, Flexicurity Theory and the Labor Market Segmentation Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the evolution of employment law. The study recommended several key reforms to address the shortcomings in the legal framework for gig workers. It suggested developing hybrid employment models that combine traditional benefits with the flexibility of gig work, reforming legal classifications to better fit gig work patterns, and enhancing regulatory frameworks to be more adaptive to technological and market changes. The study also advocated for promoting worker representation, implementing monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to assess the impact of reforms, encouraging international collaboration for harmonized regulations, and launching education and awareness initiatives to inform gig workers and employers about their rights and responsibilities. These recommendations aimed to create a more equitable and effective labor market for gig workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bennett, J. (2020). California’s AB5: What it means for gig workers and employers. Journal of Employment Law, 39(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913445.2020.1717450

Berg, J. (2016). Income security in the gig economy: The role of social protection systems. International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2816747

Cherry, M. A. (2021). The gig economy and the new employment paradigm: A review of recent legal developments. Industrial Law Journal, 50(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab006

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471-504. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2688894

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471-504. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2685566

Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Heath Lexington Books.

Esping-Andersen, G. (2015). Welfare states and social security: The Flexicurity approach. Oxford University Press.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook – Trends 2021: The role of gig work in the future of work. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2021/lang--en/index.htm

Kalleberg, A. L. (2018). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 83(2), 260-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418765188

Kalleberg, A. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2018). Precarious work: The gig economy and the future of employment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108245267

Mabaso, S. (2021). Employment law reforms and gig work in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities. African Journal of Labour Studies, 10(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2021.1905183

Nishida, M. (2020). Regulating gig work in Japan: A review of recent developments and future directions. Japanese Journal of Labor Studies, 19(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.5338/jjls.2020.19.1.90

Nishida, T. (2020). Gig economy regulation in Japan: Challenges and opportunities. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.16

Pereira, T. (2021). The Brazilian gig economy: Legislative proposals and their implications. Brazilian Journal of Employment Law, 15(3), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.2172/1530668

Poushter, J. (2016). The gig economy and its impact on employment trends. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/

Smith, R. (2018). Gig economy and the evolution of labor rights: A global perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315565832

Vallas, S. P., & Schor, J. B. (2020). The gig economy: The new world of work. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674242720

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Anan, K. (2024). The Evolution of Employment Law in the Gig Economy. Journal of Modern Law and Policy, 4(2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.2160

Issue

Section

Articles