Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding

Authors

  • Whitney Kelechi Strathmore University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.1774

Keywords:

Public Diplomacy, Nation Branding, Communication Strategies, Soft Power, International Relations

Abstract

Purpose: The general aim of the study was to explore public diplomacy and nation branding.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to public diplomacy and nation branding. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that public diplomacy plays a crucial role in shaping a nation's brand image and reputation globally. It emphasized the significance of innovative communication strategies, particularly in the digital age, to engage with international audiences effectively. The research highlighted the importance of coherence and coordination in public diplomacy efforts, advocating for a strategic and integrated approach across government agencies and stakeholders. Overall, the study underscored the complex interplay between public diplomacy and nation branding, emphasizing the need for continuous evaluation and adaptive strategies to promote national interests and identity on the global stage.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Identity theory, Agenda Setting theory and Stakeholder theory may be used to anchor future studies on public diplomacy and nation branding. The study provided valuable recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy in the fields of public diplomacy and nation branding. Through a comparative analysis of existing theories and empirical research, the study identified gaps and opportunities for theoretical development, encouraging scholars to adopt a holistic approach to theory-building. Practical recommendations were offered for public diplomacy practitioners and policymakers, emphasizing best practices and innovative strategies for enhancing nation branding efforts. Additionally, policy recommendations were provided for government officials, emphasizing the strategic importance of public diplomacy in advancing national interests and enhancing soft power. Overall, the study's recommendations helped shape more effective and impactful communication strategies, fostering constructive international relations and mutual understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkiviadou, N., & Winter, A. (2020). EU Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations. Palgrave Macmillan.

Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Palgrave Macmillan.

Anholt, S. (2012). Beyond the nation brand: The role of image and identity in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 239-259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00731.x

Anholt, S. (2012). Places: Identity, image and reputation. Springer.

Anholt-GfK. (2021). Anholt-Ipsos Nation Brands Index 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-03/nbi_2020_global_report_v2.pdf

Berridge, G. R. (2015). Diplomacy: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Brazil Tourism Board. (2020). Brazil tourism statistics. Retrieved from http://www.visitbrasil.com/en/about-brazil/brazil-tourism-statistics.html

Brazilian Institute of Tourism. (2020). Annual report 2020. Retrieved from http://www.dadosefatos.turismo.gov.br/dadosefatos/2020/

Cull, N. J. (2013). The public diplomacy reader. Routledge.

Dinnie, K. (2008). Nation branding: Concepts, issues, practice. Routledge.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Gaffney, N., & Quintas, E. (2018). Brazil: Global brand power. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gilboa, E. (2015). Diplomacy in the Digital Age: Essays in Honour of Ambassador Evron Kirkpatrick. Routledge.

Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J. (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. Harvard Business Press.

Golan, G. J. (2015). Public relations and nation branding: Concepts, issues and cases. Routledge.

Haastrup, T., & Van Rythoven, E. (Eds.). (2021). The European Union as a Diplomatic Actor. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hocking, B., Melissen, J., & Melissen, F. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of public diplomacy. Routledge.

Leonard, M., & Stead, C. (2019). Public diplomacy and soft power in East Asia. Springer.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.

Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2017). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

Melissen, J., & Zaharna, R. S. (2023). Bridging Disciplinary Divides in Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis. Routledge.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan. (2020). Annual tourism report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/en/statistics/data.html

Naidoo, V., & Ram, J. (2018). Nation branding in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. In Handbook on place branding and marketing (pp. 1-25). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Nye, J. S. (2020). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.

Okada, A. (2013). Cool Japan: A new approach to Japan's cultural diplomacy. Asia Policy, 16(4), 99-103. DOI: 10.1353/asp.2013.0043

Oliver, L., & Ram, J. (2019). Africa rising: A continental approach to nation branding. African Geographical Review, 38(1), 89-103. DOI: 10.1080/19376812.2018.1539243

Pamment, J. (2019). Public Diplomacy and the Implementation of Foreign Policy in the US, Sweden and Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pew Research Center. (2020). Global Attitudes & Trends. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/

Roper, S., & Fill, C. (2012). Corporate reputation: Brand and communication. Wiley.

Seib, P. (2012). As terrorism evolves: Media, religion, and governance. Cambridge University Press.

Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (2020). Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. Routledge.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

UNWTO. (2020). International tourism highlights 2020 edition. Retrieved from https://www.unwto.org/international-tourism-highlights-202

Wang, J., & Li, X. (2022). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: A Comparative Study of China and Japan. Routledge.

Zaharna, R. S., Arsenault, A., & Fisher, A. (2013). Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts: Innovations in Communication. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-29

How to Cite

Kelechi, W. . (2024). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding. Journal of Public Relations, 3(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.1774

Issue

Section

Articles