The Role of Family Structure in Juvenile Delinquency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1785Keywords:
Family Structure, Juvenile Delinquency, Parental Supervision, Social Learning Theory, Strain Theory, Social Control Theory, Intervention, Policy ImplicationsAbstract
Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to explore the role of family structure and juvenile diplomacy.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to family structure in juvenile diplomacy. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that family structure significantly influences adolescent engagement in delinquent behaviors, with adolescents from single-parent households or non-traditional family arrangements exhibiting higher rates of delinquency. Research highlighted the mediating role of factors such as parental supervision and positive peer relationships, along with cultural variations in this relationship. Qualitative insights underscored the unique challenges faced by adolescents from non-traditional family structures, emphasizing the importance of tailored support. Overall, the findings underscored the need for context-specific interventions and policies to address juvenile delinquency, informed by a comprehensive understanding of family dynamics and socio-cultural factors.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Learning theory, Strain theory and Social Control theory may be used to anchor future studies on the role of family structure in juvenile delinquency. The study provided recommendations with significant contributions to theory, practice, and policy. It advanced theoretical understanding by highlighting the complex interplay between family dynamics and delinquent behavior, contributing empirical support for existing theoretical models. The study recommended the development of family-centered interventions to strengthen parental supervision and support networks, promote positive peer relationships, and address systemic factors contributing to family stressors. Policy implications included initiatives to support family well-being, invest in evidence-based programs, and integrate findings into broader social policies. Collaboration across sectors was emphasized to implement comprehensive approaches, and the need for continued research to deepen understanding and inform targeted interventions was underscored.
Downloads
References
African Union. (n.d.). African Youth Envoy. https://au.int/en/youth-envoy
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-87.
Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319-361.
Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (2020). Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Routledge.
Amato, P. R. (2014). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 1269-1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12178
Amato, P. R. (2018). Family relationships and children’s economic well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12443
Amato, P. R., & James, S. (2010). Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science, 1(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620903473035
AYDN - African Youth Diplomacy Network. (n.d.). https://aydnetwork.org/
British Council. (n.d.). Global Social Leaders. https://www.globalsocialleaders.com/
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2013). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 793-828). Wiley.
Brown, A., & Johnson, M. (2013). A systematic review of interventions targeting family structure and parenting practices to reduce juvenile delinquency. Journal of Child and Adolescent Behavior, 1(1), 101.
Cavanagh, S. E., & Huston, A. C. (2016). Family instability and children’s early problem behavior. Social Forces, 95(1), 103-134. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow028
Chen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017). A cross-national study of family structure and juvenile delinquency: Comparing China and the United States. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(4), 827-841.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2021). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 591-620. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-050520-012615
Demo, D. H., & Cox, M. J. (2015). Families with young children: A review of research in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 876-895. https://doi.org/10.2307/353566
Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.2.109
Farrington, D. P. (2017). Family influences on delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 130-157). Springer.
Feinberg, M. E., & Solmeyer, A. R. (2019). Family process and youth internalizing problems: A triadic model of etiology and intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 31(2), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001308
Fomby, P., & Cherlin, A. J. (2018). Family instability and child well-being. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657471
Galambos, N. L., & Almeida, D. M. (2012). Does parent-adolescent conflict increase in early adolescence? Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00890.x
Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2013). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1662-1672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613475457
Garcia, A. M., & Rodriguez, E. (2019). Family structure transitions and juvenile delinquency among Latino adolescents: A mixed-methods study. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 41(3), 282-299.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
Japan Youth Diplomacy Network. (n.d.). https://www.jydn.org/
JET Programme. (n.d.). https://jetprogramme.org/en/
Jones, T., & Williams, R. (2014). Exploring the lived experiences of adolescents from non-traditional family structures: Implications for understanding juvenile delinquency. Journal of Family Issues, 35(7), 906-927.
Kim, S., & Park, J. (2016). Longitudinal effects of family structure on delinquency among Korean adolescents: The mediating role of family conflict and parental monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 50, 107-118.
McLoyd, V. C. (2014). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
Montanari, A., & Mapunda, C. G. (2020). Youth in Diplomacy: The role of young diplomats in international relations. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 12(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpps.12277
Nikkei Asia. (2021, August 23). Japan to boost youth diplomacy with new network. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/Japan-to-boost-youth-diplomacy-with-new-network
Open Doors. (2020). Fast facts: U.S. students studying abroad. Institute of International Education. https://opendoorsdata.org/fast-facts/
Pettit, K. L., & McLanahan, S. S. (2013). Family structure, father involvement, and adolescent behavioral outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 773-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00191.x
Pilcher, J., & Winters, N. (2017). Policy-making and the integration of young people's voices in the UK. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(7), 835-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1264524
Puzzanchera, C., & Kang, W. (2020). Easy access to the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports (EZASHR) [Data file]. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezashr/
Reynolds, J. R., & Magnuson, K. A. (2018). Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Developmental Psychology, 54(3), 532-544. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000450
Ryan, J., & Mancini, C. (2018). Family structure, parental supervision, and peer relationships: Exploring their roles in juvenile delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1882-1895.
Smith, L. K., & Johnson, R. W. (2015). Meta-analysis of family structure and juvenile delinquency: Exploring variations across gender and age groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(7), 2040-2054.
Stoltenberg, J. (2018). The importance of youth involvement in diplomatic efforts. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpa-2018-0009
Turner, H. A., & Avison, W. R. (2017). Child social development in the context of family and community risks: Research directions and implications for practice. Journal of Family Issues, 27(5), 602-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X0528050123
U.S. Department of State. (2020). Youth Ambassadors Program. https://youthambassadors.worldlearning.org/
U.S. Embassy & Consulates in Brazil. (2020). Youth Ambassadors Program. https://br.usembassy.gov/education-culture/educationusa-youth-ambassadors-program/
UNASUR - Union of South American Nations. (n.d.). https://www.unasursg.org/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cole Peters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
