MANAGERIAL CHALLENGES IN USING LEAN TECHNIQUES IN DESIGNING A COMPREHENSIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANIZATION LOGISTICS AND PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: A CASE OF DEPARTMENT OF FIELD SUPPORT (DFS), UNITED NATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.124Keywords:
managerial challenges, lean techniques, characterization, logistics and physical distribution system, Department of Field SupportAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the managerial challenges in using lean techniques in designing a comprehensive characterization of the organization logistics and physical distribution system. The study further sought to determine the extent to which these challenges impact the logistics and physical distribution of goods and informed managerial practices.
Methodology: The study employed a qualitative research design. The study targeted all the senior managers at Director Levels at the GSC and the RSC and all the senior operational staff from supply chain and service delivery pillars in three (03) large Field Missions. These field missions are namely United Nations Stabilization Mission in Congo (MONUSCO); United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS); and the United Nations Support Office for AMISOM (UNSOA). This study used purposive sampling technique. The researcher purposively sampled fifteen (15) personnel; with three (03) participants each from the GSC, RSC, and three (03) participants each from the three (03) Field Mission. Primary data was obtained from the original sources using questionnaires and interview.
Findings: The results revealed that DFS did face various challenges in the implementation of lean strategies and that the operational difficulties experienced within its operations across field missions resulted in reduced customer satisfaction, increased supplier lead time and increased operational costs. The respondents indicated that they experienced a lack of understanding of the complexity of supply chain at the senior leadership level whereby most initiatives are tainted with personal agenda as a consequent the biggest hurdle to overcome is gaining enthusiasm and trust of the staff. They also indicated that there is a high risk of asset waste and loss due to assets remaining in stock for over one year without use. Further, they indicated that there are weaknesses in the management of construction or “self-constructed” projects; and weaknesses in the restructuring of the department of peacekeeping operations.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommends that DFS should foster a continuous performance improvement mindset among staffs through planning, doing, checking and taking corrective actions on a balanced scorecard that integrates and aligns staff motivation and interest to the objectives of the organization. Also, objective and fair work plan and performance management are an ingredient to foster continuous improvementDownloads
References
Aldowaisan, T. A., & Gaafar, L. K. (1999). Business process reengineering: an approach for process mapping. Omega, 27(5), 515-24.
Bisson, B., & Folk, V. (2000). Case study: How to do business process improvement. The Journal of Quality and Participation, 23(1), 58-63.
Bolo, A. (2009). Selected strategy variables on firm’s performance of supply chain management in large private manufacturing firms in Kenya. (Unpublished MBA Project, University of Nairobi).
Brun, A. (2011). Critical success factors of six sigma implementations in Italian companies. International Journal Production Economics, 131, 158–164.
Damelio, R. (1996). The basics of process mapping quality resources. New York, NY.
Danford, M. D. (2007). Middle management resists lean implementation, survey suggests.’ Modern Machine Shop, 80(5), 1.
Droste, A. (2007). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation’, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 4(1), 105-106.
Edgeman, R. L., & Bigio, D. I. (2004). Six sigma in metaphor: Heresy or Holy Writ?’ Quality Progress, 37(1), 6.
FAO, (2007). Agro-industrial supply chain management: Concepts and applications. AGSF Occasional Paper 17 Rome.
Fiume, O. (2004). Lean at Wiremold: Beyond manufacturing, putting people front and center. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 23-32.
Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1): 7–32.
Grey, C., & Willmott, H. (2005). Critical management studies. Oxford: University Press.
Gripsrud, G., Jahre, M., & Persson, G. (2006). Supply chain management – back to the future?’ International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(8), 643-659.
Grover, V., & Malhotra, M. K. (2003). Transaction cost framework in operations and supplychain management research: Theory and measurement. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 457-473.
Harland, C. M. (2012). Supply chain management, purchasing and supply management, logistics, vertical integration, materials management and supply chain dynamics. In: Slack, N (ed.) Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Operations Management. UK: Blackwell.
Hotho, S., & Pollard. D. (2007). Management as negotiation at the interface: Moving beyond the critical-practice impasse. Organization, 14(4): 583–603.
Huang, S. H., Sheoran, S. K., & Wang, G. (2004). A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1).
Jayaram, J., Das, A., & Nicolae, M. (2010). Looking beyond the obvious: Unraveling the Toyota Production System. International Journal of Production Economics, 128, 280–291.
Jusko, J. (2007). Accounting for lean tastes. Industry Week, 256(9), 3.
Kallrath, J., Maindl, T. I. (2006). Real optimization with SAP® APO. Springer ISBN 3-540-22561-7.
Kärkkäinen, M., Ala-Risku, T., & Holmstrm, J. (2003). Increasing customer value and decreasing distribution costs with merge-in-transit. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 33(2), 132-148.
Keitany, P., & Riwo-Abudho, M. (2014). Effects of lean production on organizational performance: a case study of flour producing company in Kenya. Eur J Logistics Purchasing Supply Chain Mgmt, 2(2), 1-14.
Keller, P. J., & Jacka, J. M. (1999). Process mapping. The Internal Auditor, 56(5), 60-4.
Kouvelis, P., Chambers, C, & Wang, H. (2006). Supply chain management research and production and operations management: Review, trends and opportunities. Production and Operations Management, 15(3), 449–469.
Kumar, S., & Phrommathed, P. (2006). Improving a manufacturing process by mapping and simulation of critical operations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(1), 104-132.
Lambert, D. M. (Eds) (2012). Supply chain management: Processes, partnerships, performance, (3rded.). Supply Chain Management Institute, Sarasota, FL.
Larson, P. D., & Halldorsson, A. (2004). Logistics versus supply chain management: An international survey. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Application, 7(1), 17-31.
Lavassani, K., Movahedi, B., & Kumar, V. (2009). Developments in theories of supply chain management: The case of B2B electronic marketplace adoption. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 9(6), 85–98.
Marvel, J. H., & Standridge, C. R. (2009). Simulation-enhanced lean design process. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2, 90-113.
Mentzer, J. T. et al., (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.
Movahedi, B., Lavassani, K., & Kumar, V. (2009). Transition to B2B e-Marketplace enabled supply chain: Readiness assessment and success factors. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 5(3), 75–88.
Parker, M. (2002). Against management. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Péter, B. (2012). Overview of the United Nations Logistics Base/Global Services Center.’ Available at:http://hadmernok.hu/2012_2_benicsak.pdf. [Assessed: 18 April 2014]
Pool, A., Wijngaard, J., & van der Zee, D. (2011). Lean planning in the semi-process industry: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 194–203.
Scherrer-Rathje, M., Boyle, T. A., & Deflorin, P. (2009). Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Business Horizons, 52, 79-88.
Schonbergerm, R. J. (2007). Japanese production management: an evolution with mixed success. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 403–19.
Schweikhart, S. A., & Dembe, A. E. (2009). The applicability of lean and six sigma techniques to clinical and translational research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 57(7), 745-755.
Sealander, J., & Cross, K. (1999). Process redesign: is it worth it? Management Accounting, 80(7), 40-44.
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, andperformance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 129-149.
Shokri, A., Oglethorpe, D., & Nabhani, F. (2014). Evaluating six sigma methodology to improve logistical measures of food distribution SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(7), 998 – 1027.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-levi, E. (2007). Designing and managing the supply chain, Third edition, Mcgraw Hill.
Vienazindiene, M., & Ciarniene, R. (2013). Lean manufacturing implementation and process measurement. Economics and Management, 18(2).
Wainaina, G. (2009). Supply chain management best practices in large private manufacturing firms in Kenya. (Unpublished MBA project, University of Nairobi).
Wan, H., & Chen, F. F. (2008). A leanness measure of manufacturing systems for quantifyingimpacts of lean initiatives. International Journal of Production Research, 46, 6567-6584.
Womack, M., & Jones, N. (2009). Lean practices in organizations. Industrial Engineer, 39(40), 1.
Yavuz, A., & Cengiz, D. (2015). Impact of competitive strategies and supply chain strategies on the firm performance under environmental uncertainties: Borsa Istanbul case in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(1).
Zakuan, N., & Mat-Saman, M. Z. (2009). Lean manufacturing concept: The main factor inimproving manufacturing performance–a case study. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 17, 353-363.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
