Impact of Technological Advancements on Work and Employment Patterns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jas.1856Keywords:
Technological Advancements, Employment Patterns, Digital Economy, Skills Development, Labor Market, Automation, Education, Training Programs, Inclusive Growth, Stakeholders, Innovation, Sustainability, Socio-Economic Implications, CollaborationAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to examine the impact of technological advancements on work and employment patterns.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of religion in shaping social attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights. The study provided comprehensive insights into the transformative effects of technology on the labor market. Through an analysis of existing literature and empirical studies, the research highlighted the emergence of job polarization, non-standard forms of employment, and the growing importance of education and skills development in the digital economy. The findings emphasized the need for proactive policy responses to address the challenges posed by technological change while harnessing its benefits for inclusive and sustainable economic growth. Overall, the study contributed valuable knowledge to the understanding of how technological advancements shape work and employment patterns, guiding future efforts to navigate the complexities of the digital age.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Structural Transformation theory, Skill- Biased Technological Change theory and Institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on technological advancements on work and employment patterns. The study provided recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy. It called for further research to explore the mechanisms underlying the relationship between technology and employment. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of investing in education and skills development to prepare the workforce for the challenges of the digital economy. From a policy perspective, proactive measures were recommended to promote inclusive and sustainable employment growth, including strategies to support workers through transitions and ensure equitable distribution of benefits. Collaboration between stakeholders and ongoing monitoring and evaluation of policy interventions were also highlighted as crucial for addressing the socio-economic implications of technological change.
Downloads
References
Abraham, K. G., Haltiwanger, J. C., Sandusky, K., & Spletzer, J. R. (2017). Measuring the gig economy: Current knowledge and open issues. Labour Economics, 46, 123-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2017.03.008
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244.
Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189.
Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-1597.
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2003). The polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 96(2), 189-194.
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1169-1213.
Barbosa-Filho, N. H., & Garcia, R. (2018). Informal employment, poverty, and inequality in Brazil: Literature review and new evidence. World Development, 110, 234-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.010
Bessen, J. E. (2019). AI and jobs: The role of demand. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31-50.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlström, P., ... & Henke, N. (2018). Skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce. McKinsey Global Institute.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements"”May 2020. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/conemp.nr0.htm
Campbell, K., Meissner, K., & Loughlin, C. (2021). Automation and the future of work: Understanding the role of institutional factors. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1), 100722.
Campbell, T. A., Ivanova, O. S., & Williams, C. B. (2012). Additive manufacturing: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 62(5-8), 1147-1155.
Chen, M. A., & Siems, A. (2016). Why is there so much "˜bad' work in developing countries? Explaining high levels of informal employment in Brazil. Development and Change, 47(2), 281-305. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12210
Deloitte. (2019). From jobs to superjobs: 2020 global human capital trends. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/human-capital/articles/introduction-human-capital-trends.html
Dengler, K., Matthes, B., & Paulus, W. (2018). Occupational tasks across the wage distribution: Implications for employment polarization in Germany. Work and Occupations, 45(2), 202-230.
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 26948. DOI: 10.3386/w26948
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213), 1258096.
Dutta, S., & Mia, I. (2019). Future of jobs report 2018. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.
Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171-188.
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. Springer.
Hewitt, M. (2020). The rise of zero-hour contracts: Work in a post-welfare state. Policy Press. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447348609.001.0001
IBGE (2021). Continuous National Household Sample Survey: Characteristics of the employed population. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/labor/17270-continuous-national-household-sample-survey-characteristics-of-the-employed-population.html?=&t=downloads
ILO. (2021). ILOSTAT database. International Labour Organization. Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/
Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2011). Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1170-1190.
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. NBER Working Paper No. 22667.
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139-191.
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Stamenov, K., & Dhingra, D. (2016). Independent work: Choice, necessity, and the gig economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2019). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2021). Labor Force Survey. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/roudou/index.html
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Preparing for future products of biotechnology. National Academies Press.
OECD. (2020). OECD employment outlook 2020: Worker security and the COVID-19 crisis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from
Office for National Statistics. (2021). Contracts that do not guarantee a minimum number of hours. Office for National Statistics, UK. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/bulletins/contractsandholidayswithoutguaranteedhours/april2020tomarch2021
PwC. (2014). 3D printing and the new shape of industrial manufacturing. PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Qaim, M. (2016). Genetically modified crops and agricultural development. Palgrave Macmillan.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.
Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
World Bank. (2020). Brazil Economic Monitor: Labor Market in Times of COVID-19. World Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/34792
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020
Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22-32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yenkatabuwe Song
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.