Gender Dynamics in STEM Fields: Women's Experiences in Different Cultural Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jas.1857Keywords:
Gender Dynamics, STEM Fields, Women's Experiences, Cultural Contexts, Intersectionality, Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), Diversity, Inclusion, Career Aspirations, Cultural Values, Gender Stereotypes, Organizational Change, Global Collaboration, Equity, Inclusivity, Empowerment, Systemic Barriers, Continuous ImprovementAbstract
Purpose: The general aim of this study was to explore gender dynamics in STEM fields particularly, women's experiences in different cultural contexts.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the gender dynamics in STEM fields. Through a comparative analysis across diverse cultural settings, significant variations in women's experiences in STEM were revealed, with some societies demonstrating greater gender equity and support for women. However, persistent disparities and challenges related to cultural norms and gender roles were observed in others. The research underscored the intersectional nature of gender dynamics in STEM, emphasizing the interconnectedness of gender with other dimensions of identity such as race and ethnicity. Additionally, cultural stereotypes and societal expectations were identified as significant barriers to women's participation and advancement in STEM fields. The findings underscored the importance of context-specific approaches to promoting gender equity in STEM and highlighted the need for challenging stereotypes and fostering inclusive environments for women in STEM fields globally.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Cognitive Career theory (SCCT), intersectionality theory and Cultural-Historical Activity theory (CHAT) may be used to anchor future studies on gender dynamics in STEM fields. The study provided valuable recommendations with significant implications for theory, practice, and policy. It contributed to theoretical advancements by highlighting the intersectional nature of gender dynamics in STEM, offering practical recommendations for stakeholders in education and workforce development, and suggesting policy interventions aimed at promoting gender equity in STEM fields. The study emphasized the importance of organizational change, global collaboration, and continuous evaluation and improvement in advancing gender equity in STEM. By implementing these recommendations, stakeholders could work towards creating more equitable and inclusive environments where women could thrive and contribute meaningfully to STEM fields worldwide.
Downloads
References
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). "Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous": Primary school girls' and parents' constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171-194. DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386. DOI: 10.1080/09540250500145072
Chen, H., & Lee, S. (2019). Cultural influences on women's experiences in STEM: A comparative study of East Asian countries. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(3), 350-368. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12306
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241-247. DOI: 10.1037/h0086006
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8. Retrieved from https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
Eby, L. T., Butts, M., & Lockwood, A. (2013). Predictors of success in the era of the boundaryless career. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S30-S50. DOI: 10.1002/job.1895
Eccles, J. S. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195-201. DOI: 10.1177/0165025411398189
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
European Commission. (2019). She Figures 2018: Gender in Research and Innovation. DOI: 10.2777/292882
Fouad, N. A., Singh, R., Fitzpatrick, M. E., & Liu, J. P. (2016). Stemming the tide of women leaving engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 79-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002
Fukuda, A., Oshima, T., & Hiraoka, M. (2017). Gender differences in career attitudes and work environments among Japanese scientists and engineers. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(6), 611-625. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12177
GarcÃa, M., & RodrÃguez, A. (2020). Exploring the intersectionality of gender and ethnicity in STEM: Perspectives from Latin America. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 123-141. DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000154
Gibbs Jr, K. D., McGready, J., & Bennett, J. C. (2015). Mentoring, diversity, and under"representation in higher education. Educational Policy, 29(1), 22-50. DOI: 10.1177/0895904814528980
IBGE. (2020). Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Retrieved from https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101760_informativo.pdf
Kim, S., & Park, J. (2017). The impact of cultural stereotypes on women's career aspirations in STEM: A case study of South Korea. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(4), 456-472. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2017.1372946
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower. Rutgers University Press.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2020). White Paper on Science and Technology 2020. Retrieved from https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/whitepaper/2020/wps2020.pdf
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/11741
National Science Foundation. (2021). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables
Office for National Statistics. (2020). UK Labour Market: March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/uklabourmarket/march2020
Oliveira, M., & Silva, A. (2016). Cultural influences on women's experiences in STEM: A case study of Brazil. Gender and Education, 28(7), 896-912. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2016.1250642
Ribeiro, P. M., Silva, M. T. L., & Costa, M. A. B. (2018). Gender inequality in the Brazilian science and technology system. Gender, Technology and Development, 22(2), 87-103. DOI: 10.1177/0971852418788731
Smith, J. L., Handley, I. M., Zale, A. V., Rushing, S., & Potvin, M. A. (2019). Now hiring! Empirically testing the effectiveness of diversity statements. BioScience, 69(10), 899-906. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biz111
Smith, J., & Jones, L. (2017). Exploring gender dynamics in STEM: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 632-649. DOI: 10.1177/0022022117692167
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
Tanaka, R., & Yamamoto, H. (2014). Cultural influences on women's experiences in STEM: Perspectives from Japan. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(5), 475-490. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12063
UNESCO. (2021). Women in Science. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/themes/women-sciences/women-sciences-statistics
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., & Li, Q. (2018). Cultural influences on women's career choices in STEM: A comparative study of East Asian countries. Journal of Career Development, 45(6), 789-805. DOI: 10.1177/0894845317737625
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151. DOI: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
Wodon, Q., Montenegro, C. E., Nguyen, H., & Onagoruwa, A. (2018). Missed opportunities: The high cost of not educating girls. World Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1176-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Emma Lariba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
