The Sociological Implications of Climate Change: Community Adaptation and Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jas.1858Keywords:
Sociological Implications, Climate Change, Community Adaptation, Resilience, Social Networks, Cultural Norms, Power Dynamics, Community-Based Approaches, Participatory Decision-Making, Knowledge Co-Production, Equity, Participatory Governance, Policy Frameworks, Interdisciplinary Research, VulnerabilityAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore the sociological implications of climate change, that is, community adaptation and resilience.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the sociological implications of climate change. Preliminary empirical review revealed that sociological perspectives are crucial for understanding and addressing climate change challenges. It emphasized the significance of social capital, participatory approaches, and context-specific strategies in enhancing community resilience. By examining the interplay between social dynamics, power relations, and adaptive capacities, the study highlighted the importance of addressing socio-economic disparities and fostering collaboration among diverse stakeholders. Overall, it underscored the need for holistic and transformative approaches to climate change adaptation that integrate social, ecological, and economic dimensions.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Capital theory, Risk Society theory and Ecological Modernization theory may be used to anchor future studies on the sociological implications of climate change. The study provided valuable recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy. It emphasized the integration of sociological perspectives into climate change adaptation, highlighting the role of social networks, cultural norms, and power dynamics. Practical implications included advocating for community-based approaches, participatory decision-making, and knowledge co-production activities. At the policy level, the study underscored the importance of mainstreaming social considerations into climate change policy frameworks, promoting equity and participatory governance. Recommendations for future research included exploring socio-economic drivers of vulnerability, conducting longitudinal studies, and advancing interdisciplinary research agendas to inform evidence-based strategies for building resilient communities.
Downloads
References
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2013). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-3780(05)80042-6
Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O'Brien, K. (2019). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 494-496. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0504-y
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R. & Wreford, A. (2013). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 134(1-2), 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0401-0
Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.
Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2006). Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 50-75. DOI: 10.1162/152638006776381744
Barnett, J., & O'Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 211-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
Barnett, J., & O'Neill, S. (2019). Poverty, gender, and climate change: Lessons from rural Bangladesh. World Development, 122, 24-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.020
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press.
Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Wellstead, A., & Howlett, M. (2017). The role of learning in enabling transformative adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(5), 395-405. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1776
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Carter, J. G., Handley, J. F., & Milledge, D. G. (2015). Community resilience and oil spills in coastal Louisiana. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 33. DOI: 10.5751/ES-07611-200233
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95-S120.
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2018). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
de Souza, M. D., Wartmann, F. M., & Morgado, F. (2020). Traditional knowledge as an essential approach for adaptation to climate change: The case of the Brazilian Amazon. Weather, Climate, and Society, 12(2), 261-273. DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0095.1
DEFRA. (2018). The UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-change-risk-assessment-2017
DÃaz, S., Settele, J., BrondÃzio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Guèze, M., Agard, J., ... & Zayas, C. N. (2019). Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science, 366(6471), eaax3100. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax3100
Eisenack, K., Moser, S. C., Hoffmann, E., Klein, R. J., Oberlack, C., Pechan, A., & Rotter, M. (2014). Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 867-872. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2350
Environment Agency. (2020). Thames Estuary 2100. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/case-studies/thames-estuary-2100
Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J., & Eakin, H. (2015). Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 523-533. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
FAO. (2019). Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/i3325e/i3325e.pdf
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. DOI: 10.5751/ES-03610-150420
Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Bunce, A., McKay, C., Irwin, M., & Pearce, T. (2018). The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1301-1313. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-017-1240-5
Gomez-Baggethun, E., Corbera, E., & Reyes-GarcÃa, V. (2012). Traditional ecological knowledge and global environmental change: Research findings and policy implications. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 72. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05163-170472
Hurlimann, A. C., Dolnicar, S., & Meyer, P. (2016). Understanding behaviour to inform climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 647-653. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2924
IPCC. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.)]. IPCC.
IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, ... & T. Waterfield (Eds.)]. IPCC.
IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Pan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekc, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.
Lafferty, W. M., & Meadowcroft, J. (2000). Democracy and the environment: An international comparison of environmental governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(5), 561-576. DOI: 10.1068/c180561
Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2017). The social and political lives of zoonotic disease models: Narratives, science and policy. Social Science & Medicine, 187, 162-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.032
Melillo, J. M., Richmond, T. C., & Yohe, G. W. (Eds.). (2014). Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. DOI: 10.7930/J0Z31WJ2
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute.
Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17-49. DOI: 10.1080/09644010008414535
NASA. (2020). Climate Change: How Do We Know? Retrieved from https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
O'Brien, K. (2018). Climate change and social transformations: Is it time for a quantum leap? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(3), e514. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.514
Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005). Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 308-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001
Pidgeon, N. F., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 35-41. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1080
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W. D., Hammer, S. A., & Mehrotra, S. (2018). Climate change and cities: Second assessment report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108235702
Smith, C., Wolf, J., & McKemey, K. (2018). Building resilient communities: Community-based adaptation to climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 86, 22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.007
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., ... & Midgley, P. M. (Eds.). (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650-667. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh013
UNISDR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
Ziervogel, G., Bharwani, S., Downing, T. E., Adger, W. N., & Walker, B. (2020). The Role of Community-Based Adaptation in Urban Resilience. Climate Policy, 20(7), 801-814. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1760594
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Terry Akuba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
