OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND THE GROWTH OF MICROFINANCE SECTOR IN KENYA

Authors

  • Dr. James Rurigi Njuguna Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Prof. Roselyn Gakure Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. Anthony Gichuhi Waititu Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. Paul Katuse United States International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.120
Abstract views: 360
PDF downloads: 435

Keywords:

operational risk management practices, policies and procedures, internal control systems, fraud, growth, MFIs

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish how operational risk management strategies lead to growth of MFI sector in Kenya.

Methodology: The study adopted a correlation survey research design. The population of this study was fifty seven (57) MFIs. The sampling frame was the list of MFIs provided in the AMFI website www.amfikenya.com. A sample of thirteen (17) MFIs was selected using the random sampling approach. A questionnaire and an interview schedule were the main data collection tools. Qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis whereas the quantitative data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) where descriptive and regression analysis were conducted to determine the relationship between enterprise risk management strategies and growth of MFIs.

Findings: Findings revealed that the MFI had adequate policies and procedures to manage its operational risks and the MFI had an operations manual. The findings also indicated that the MFIs have adhered to written policies and procedures to manage operational risks in the financial operations area, procurement area, treasury area, and financial management area. Results further indicated that the MFI had effective internal control systems for detecting fraud or other significant operational risks. Finally the study findings indicated that MFI’s internal audit functions ensured effective use of resources, accurate financial reporting, and ample random spot checks of MFI branches, clients, and staff. The regression results indicated that there was a positive relationship between operational risk management strategies and MFI growth.

Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommends that the MFIs to continue practicing effective operational risk management practices such as internal control framework comprising of policies and procedures. MFIs need to uphold the existence and accessibility of operational manuals. It is suggested that adherence to written policies and procedures is positive strategy and it should be emphasized.  The internal audit functions for effective use of resources and accurate financial reporting needs to be emphasized as it had a positive effect on growth. The MFIs should also benchmark their technology with that of banks to reduce human error, to produce timely and relevant data. It is recommended that implementation of know your client (KYC) requirements should be enhanced as it has an effect on growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. James Rurigi Njuguna, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Lecturer

Prof. Roselyn Gakure, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Lecturer

Dr. Anthony Gichuhi Waititu, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Lecturer

Dr. Paul Katuse, United States International University

Lecturer

References

Arkolakis C. (2011). A unified theory of firm selection and growth. Yale University, NBER & CESifo.

Asian Development Bank. (2003). Sharing information on microfinance. .A quarterly newsletter of the focal point for microfinance. December 2003.Vol.4 No. 4.

Babbie, E. R. (2004). The practice of social research. Belmont C.A. Wadsworth

Barkham, R., Gudgin, G. H., & Havey, E. (1996). The determinants of small firm growth. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2004). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – A Revised Framework.” November 2005, Part 2, Section V-A. Available online at www.bis.org/publ/bcbs118.pdf.

Berenbach, S., & Guzman, D. (1994). The solidarity group experience worldwide,” in the New World of Microenterprise Finance, edited by M. Oteroand E. Rhyne. Kumarian Press, West Hartford CT: 119-139.

Bertalanffy, L. (1962). General systems theory: A critical review.

Business Dictionary. (2010). http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/business. Accessed on 10th September 2011.

CBK. (2010). Risk management survey for the banking sector. Year book, 7(1-20), 17.

CGAP (2009). Operational risk management for microfinance institutions, www.cgap.org

Christen, R. P., Elisabeth, R., & Robert, V. (1995). Maximizing the outreach of microenterprise finance: The emerging lessons of successful programs. USAID Program and Operations Assessment Report No. 10.

Churchill, C. F. (1997). Managing growth: The organizational architecture of microfinance institutions. USAID’s Microenterprise Best Practices Project. Bethesda, MD: Development Alternatives, Inc. Website: www.mip.org

Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16, 5-14.

Cortright J. (2001). New growth theory, technology and learning: A practitioners guide, Portland, OR: Impresa, Inc.

Delmar, F. (1998). Taxonomy of high growth firms: Entrepreneurship and small business. Research Institute (ESBRI).Sweden

Desender, K. (2007). On the determinants of enterprise risk management implementation. Teaching cases collection, advancing the concepts & practices of information Resources Management in Modern Organizations.

Early, T. (1993). Sustainable measures: Indicators of sustainability (website accessed 15/08/2011) http://www.sustainablemeasures.com/Indicators/ChecklistItself.html

Ekka, P., Chaundry, S., & Sinha, R. (2011). Risk management: Integrating SPM into microfinance capacity building. Guidance Note. Accessed 12th September 2011).

Ellis, A., Cutura, J. N., Dione, I., Gillson, C., & Thongori, J. M. (2007). Gender and economic growth in Kenya: Unleashing the power of women, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, Washington DC

Fraser. I., & Henry, W. (2007). Embedding risk management: Structures and approaches. Managerial Auditing Journal.22 (24): 392-409

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Gilbert C. (2007). Enterprise risk management techniques and practices. Incisive Media Investments Limited.

Gonzalez, A. (2011). Defining responsible financial performance: How to think about growth. Annual meeting of the Social Performance Task Force, June 19-24 in Den Bosch, Netherlands.

Gonzalez-Vega, C., Mark, S., Richard, L. M., Jorge, R., & Navajas, S. (1997). BancoSol: The challenge of growth for microfinance organizations," in Hartmut Schneider (ed.), Microfinance for the Poor? Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 129-170.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Jovanovic, B. (2000). Growth theory. Working paper. NBER series.

Klimczak, K. M. (2005). Corporate risk management from stakeholders' perspective. TRANS’ 05, SGH, Warszawa, Poland, pp. 371-380.

Kombo, A., Wesonga, J., Murumba, N., & Makworo, E. (2011). An evaluation of the impact of risk management strategies on micro-finance institutions’ financial sustainability: A case of selected micro finance institutions in Kisii Municipality, Kenya. Educational Research (ISSN: 2141-5161) Vol. 2(5) pp. 1149-1153 May 2011.Available online@ http://www.interesjournals.org/ER

Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance handbook: An institutional and financial perspective. Sustainable Banking with the Poor. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. (1987). Corporate Insurance and the Underinvestment Problem. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 54(1), 45-54.

McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: a focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice Journal.

Mokoro, J. M., Nyaoga, R. B., Magutu, P. O., Khoya, O. M., & Onsongo, C. O. (2010). The transition from micro-financing into formal banking among the micro finance institutions in Kenya. AIBUMA Publishing African Journal of Business & Management (AJBUMA) http://www.aibuma.org/journal/index.htm. Vol. 1.

Mugenda, Olive M. and Mugenda, Abel G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches, Acts Press, Nairobi-Kenya

Omino G. (2005). Regulation and supervision of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya. Central bank of Kenya.

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press. Publishing Company.

Penrose, E. T. (1985). The theory of the growth of the firm: Twenty five years after. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Oeconomicae Negotiorum (Upsala Lectures in Business) 20: 1–16.

Rosenbaum F. (1993). Sustainable measures: Indicators of sustainability (website accessed 15/08/2011) http://www. Sustainable measures.com / Indicators / Check list Itself.html

Smith, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (1985). The determinants of firm's hedging policies. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), 391-405.

The Grameen Bank (2000a). Models of micro finance. http://www.grameen-info.org/annualreport/annualreport2000/index.html

Tseng, C. (2007). Internal control, enterprise risk management, and firm performance. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Department of Accounting and Information Assurance. Robert H. Smith School of Business).

Vieira, P. (1993). Sustainable measures: Indicators of sustainability (website accessed 15/08/2011) http://www.sustainablemeasures.com/Indicators/ChecklistItself.htm

Downloads

Published

2017-03-01

How to Cite

Njuguna, D. J. R., Gakure, P. R., Waititu, D. A. G., & Katuse, D. P. (2017). OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND THE GROWTH OF MICROFINANCE SECTOR IN KENYA. Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 2(2), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.120

Issue

Section

Articles