Habits, Motivation and Performance: An Integrative Model for Organisational Improvement Grounded in Brain Science

Authors

  • Brian Mateyo Haketa University of Zambia
  • Dr. Abubaker Qutieshat University of Zambia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.1667

Keywords:

Habits, Motivation, Performance, Productivity, Organizational Improvement

Abstract

Purpose: Organizations aim to cultivate motivated and productive workforces, yet often struggle to understand the complex neurological factors shaping employee habits, engagement, and performance. This paper presents an integrative model linking psychological needs, motivation systems, and contextual supports to optimize collective habits and outcomes.

Methodology: A mixed methods study of 400 employees in Zambia's public health sector combined surveys, interviews, statistical analysis, and prior organizational research.

Findings: Results indicated the limitations of existing habit frameworks in capturing neurological dynamics. Just 31% felt current models reliably predict long-term impacts on performance. Key findings revealed that the top motivators were financial rewards, career growth, and training. On-the-job skill-building is also rated highly. Clear expectations, collaboration, and resources further enabled productivity.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: Based on the data, a Motivation-Performance Model is proposed, encompassing elements like empowerment, open communication, and flexibility to fulfil psychological needs. Individual, team, and organizational factors intersect to form collective habits and effectiveness. Implementing diagnostic and enhancement strategies based on the model offers an actionable approach to leveraging habits for competitive advantage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Brian Mateyo Haketa, University of Zambia

Post Graduate Student: Graduate School of Business

Dr. Abubaker Qutieshat, University of Zambia

Lecturer, Graduate School of Business

References

Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2017). Does basic need satisfaction mediate the link between stress exposure and well-being? A diary study among beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 50, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.005

Butler, J. K., & Gray, P. H. (2006). Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 211-224.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328

Gardner, B., de Bruijn, G. J., & Lally, P. (2011). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Self-Report Habit Index applications to nutrition and physical activity behaviours. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(2), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9282-0

Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.010

Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(21), 1789-1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01066.x

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Kwon, K., & Park, J. (2019). The life cycle of employee engagement theory in human resource development research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(3), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319851244

Lally, P., Van Jaarsveld, C. H., Potts, H. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674

Neal, D. T., Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2006). Habits"”A repeat performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(4), 198-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00435.x

Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

Zhang, X., & Liu, C. (2011). Organisational climate and its effects on organisational variables: An empirical study. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v3n2p68

Downloads

Published

2024-02-08

How to Cite

Haketa, B. M., & Qutieshat, A. (2024). Habits, Motivation and Performance: An Integrative Model for Organisational Improvement Grounded in Brain Science. Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 9(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.1667

Issue

Section

Articles