Exploring the Consumer Preference for Sustainable Packaging in Metro Manila: Investigating the Influence of Environmental Values, Product Quality, and Price Sensitivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.2429Keywords:
Consumer Preference, Environmental Values, Product Quality, Price Sensitivity, Plastic Pollution, Sustainable PackagingAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate consumer preferences for sustainable packaging in Metro Manila, focusing on the influence of environmental values, perceived product quality, and price sensitivity.
Methodology: A logistic regression model was employed to analyze the relationship between these variables and consumer willingness to pay a premium for sustainable packaging. Data will be collected through surveys administered to a sample of consumers in Metro Manila.
Findings: Environmental values, perceived product quality, and price sensitivity significantly shape consumer preferences for sustainable packaging in Metro Manila. Consumers with strong environmental beliefs, those who perceive sustainable packaging as higher quality, and those less concerned about price are more likely to select sustainable options.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy, and Practice: Consumers value both the functional and emotional aspects of products, as suggested by the Hedonic Pricing Model. In the context of sustainable packaging, consumers are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly and socially responsible options. To effectively promote sustainable packaging, businesses should prioritize high-quality, innovative solutions that align with consumer values and are affordable.
Downloads
References
Achchuthan, S., Von Der Heidt, T., Scherrer, P., & Sorwar, G. (2021). A consumer values-based approach to enhancing green consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.013
Al-Mamun, A., Rahman, M. K., & Robel, S. D. (2014). A Critical Review of Consumers’ sensitivity to Price: Managerial and theoretical issues. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265598350_A_Critical_Review_of_Consumers'_Sensitivity_to_Price_Managerial_and_Theoretical_Issues
Albari, A. (2020). The influence of product quality, service quality and price on customer satisfaction and loyalty. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339796640
Alijosine, S. Salamadic, E., & Gudonaviciene, R. (2014). Price sensitivity measurement depending on brand awareness: a case of Ziede brand. 19th International Scientific Conference; Economics and Management 2014, ICEM 2014, 23-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.224
Anselmsson, J., Bondesson, N., & Johansson, U. (2014). Brand image and customers’ willingness to pay a price premium for food brands. The Journal of Product and Brand Management/Journal of Product and Brand Management, 23(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-10-2013-0414
Barnuevo, M. K. M., & Roma, G. S. (2023). Cultivating Consumer Choices: Exploring the impact of product packaging design on purchasing behavior in the food processing Industry of Metro Baguio (MBLISTTDA). International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.6981
Bhat, M. A. & Lone, R. A., (2023). The role of customer satisfaction as a mediator between product quality and customer loyalty. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 12(06), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v12n06.002
Bósquez, N. G. C., Veas-González, I., Naranjo-Armijo, F., Llamo-Burga, M. J., Ortiz-Regalado, O., Ruiz-García, W., Guerra-Regalado, W., & Vidal-Silva, C. (2024). Advertising and Eco-Labels as Influencers of Eco-Consumer Attitudes and Awareness—Case Study of Ecuador. Foods, 13(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13020228
Boz, Z., Korhonen, V., & Koelsch Sand, C. (2020). Consumer considerations for the implementation of sustainable packaging: A review. Sustainability, 12(6), 2192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062192
Carvalho, J. S., Oliveira, J. D. S. C., & SÃO JOSÉ, J. F. B. D. (2022). Consumers’ knowledge, dppractices, and perceptions about conventional and sustainable food packaging. Food Science and Technology, 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.06722
Castillo, A., & Otoma, S. (2013). Status of solid waste management in the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.14912/jsmcwm.24.0_677
Chaudhary, S. (2014). The role of packaging in consumer's perception of product quality. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 3(3), 17-21. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/
Chitturi, R., Londoño, J. C., & Henriquez, M. C. (2022). Visual design elements of product packaging: Implications for consumers' emotions, perceptions of quality, and price. Color Research and Application, 47(3), 729-744. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22761
Cordeiro, G. M., & Simas, A. B. (2009). The distribution of Pearson residuals in generalized linear models. Computational statistics & data analysis, 53(9), 3397-3411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.02.025
Danes, J. E., Hess, J. S., Singh, J., & Metcalf, L. E., (2014). The impact of consumer product package quality on consumption satisfaction, brand perceptions, consumer investment and behavior. Journal of Applied Packaging Research, 6(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.14448/japr.01.0003
De Leániz, P. M. G., Herrero, Á., & López, R. G. (2017). Customer responses to environmentally certified hotels: the moderating effect of environmental consciousness on the formation of behavioral intentions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1349775
Dena, A., Honrado, L., Lin, P. M., & Dotong, E. (2023). Promoting the Usage of Eco-Friendly Tertiary Packaging: A market research on the perceived behavior of Filipino consumers based on sustainability factors. American Journal of Social Development and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsde.v2i1.1223
Ecevit, M. Z. (2023). The Effect of Sustainable Packaging on Quality Perception and Purchase Intention: The Moderator Role of Environmental Consciousness and Health Consciousness. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 21(3), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/yead.1342196
Evgeniya, M., Masenko, A., Yekimov, S., & Grankina, N., Zadyora, O. (2021). Product stewardship taking into account the satisfaction of consumer preferences. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.06.03.153
Fu, X., Han, G. & Liu, S. (2021). Supply chain partners’ decisions with heterogeneous marketing efforts considering consumer’s perception of quality. RAIRO. Recherche OpéRationnelle/RAIRO. Recherche Opérationnelle, 55(5), 3227–3243. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021126
Gano-An, J. C. (2018). Consumers’ preferences on the use of eco-friendly bags: a green marketing perspective. Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura, 20(3), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v20i3.1104
Ghali-Zinoubi, Z. (2020). Determinants of consumer purchase intention and behavior toward green product: The moderating role of price sensitivity. Archives of Business Research, 8(1), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.81.7429
Granato, G., Fischer, A. R., & Van Trijp, H. C. (2022). The price of sustainability: How consumers trade-off conventional packaging benefits against sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132739
Gritsenko, N., & Rud, E. (2019). Development of an effective product quality management system. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(4(49)), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.181515
Hao, Y., Liu, H., Chen, H., Sha, Y., Ji, H., & Fan, J. (2019). What affect consumers’ willingness to pay for green packaging? Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.001
Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I. (2018). Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging–A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of cleaner production, 194, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106
Herrmann, C., Rhein, S., & Sträter, K. F. (2022). Consumers’ sustainability-related perception of and willingness-to-pay for food packaging alternatives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 181, 106219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219
Hossain, M. S., Rahman, A. M., Kibria, M. G., & Chakrovorty, S. (2014). Measuring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Each Attribute of a Product: A Review on Hedonic Pricing Model. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(25), 83-90. Retrieved from ResearchGate
Hyder, N., & Amir, A. (2023). IMPACT OF GREEN PACKAGING ON CONSUMERS BUYING BEHAVIOR: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ATTITUDE. Indian Scientific Journal of Research in Engineering and Management, 07(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem25741
Ibrahim, I. D., Hamam, Y., Sadiku, R., Ndambuki, J. M., Kupolati, W. K., Jamiru, T., Eze, A. A., & Snyman, J. (2022). Need for sustainable packaging: An overview. Polymers, 14(20), 4430. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204430
Inderst, R., & Obradovits, M. (2020). Pricing and Product Positioning with Relative Consumer Preferences. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4006097
Kawecka, A. (2016). REALIZATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING IDEA. CASE STUDY FROM POLISH AND EUROPEAN MARKET. Sj-economics Scientific Journal, 22(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.58246/sjeconomics.v22i3.332
Kozik, N. (2020). Sustainable packaging as a tool for global sustainable development. SHS Web of Conferences, 74, 04012. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207404012
Kusuma, N. P., Suyadi, I., & Abdillah, Y. (2014). ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT QUALITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND CUSTOMER LOYALTY IN INDONESIAN SMEs. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol. 14 No. 1. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/84269-EN-analyzing-the-effect-of-product-quality.pdf
Lavuri, R. (2022). Organic green purchasing: Moderation of environmental protection emotion and price sensitivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133113
Law, M. M. S., Hills, P., & Hau, B. C. H. (2015). Engaging Employees in sustainable Development – a case study of environmental education and awareness training in Hong Kong. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1903
Lee, H. J., & Park, S. (2018). Consumer Values and Green Consumption : Implications for Marketing strategy and Environmental Policy. Asia Marketing Journal, 19(4), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.15830/amj.2018.19.4.87
Magnier, L., & Crié, D. (2015). Communicating packaging eco-friendliness: An exploration of consumers’ perceptions of eco-designed packaging. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 350-366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2014-0048
Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005
Magnier, L., Schoormans, J., & Mugge, R. (2016). Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products. Food quality and preference, 53, 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006
Mahajan, Y., Hudnurkar, M., Ambekar, S., & Hiremath, R. (2023). The Effect of Sustainable Packaging Aesthetic on Consumer Behavior: A Case Study from India. Kapse, U., Mahajan, Y., Hudnurkar, M., Ambekar, S., and Hiremath, 236-246. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4480716
Moraga-González, J., & Sun, Y. (2023). Product quality and consumer search. American Economic Journal. Microeconomics, 15(1), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200300
Nascimento, A. G., Toledo, B. S., Guimarães, J. T., Ramos, G. L., da Cunha, D. T., Pimentel, T. C., & Mársico, E. T. (2022). The impact of packaging design on the perceived quality of honey by Brazilian consumers. Food Research International, 151, 110887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110887
Nattino, G., Pennell, M. L., & Lemeshow, S. (2020). Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: a modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Biometrics, 76(2), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13249
Nguyen, A. T., Parker, L., Brennan, L., & Lockrey, S. (2020). A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119792
Norton, V., Waters, C., Oloyede, O. O., & Lignou, S. (2022). Exploring consumers’ understanding and perception of sustainable food packaging in the UK. Foods, 11(21), 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213424
Olise, M. C. & Ojiaku, O. C. (2018). Effects of Product Quality on Customer Satisfaction: A Review of Manufacturing Company’s Performance in Anambra State. International Journal of Business and Law Research 6(1):39-47. Retrieved from https://seahipaj.org/journals-ci/mar-2018/IJBLR/full/IJBLR-M-4-2018.pdf
Oloyede, O. O., & Lignou, S. (2021). Sustainable paper-based packaging: A consumer’s perspective. Foods, 10(5), 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051035
Onel, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2015). Understanding environmentally sensitive consumer behaviour: an integrative research perspective. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-07-2014-0021
Orzan, G., Cruceru, A. F., Bălăceanu, C. T., & Chivu, R. G. (2018). Consumers’ behavior concerning sustainable packaging: An exploratory study on Romanian consumers. Sustainability, 10(6), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061787
Otto, S., Strenger, M., Maier-Nöth, A., & Schmid, M. (2021). Food packaging and sustainability–Consumer perception vs. correlated scientific facts: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126733
Özdemir, T., & Eyduran, E. (2005). Comparison of Chi-Square and likelihood ratio Chi-Square tests: Power of test. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1(2), 242-244. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
Paler, M. K. O., Malenab, M. C. T., Maralit, J. R., & Nacorda, H. M. E. (2019). Plastic waste occurrence on a beach off southwestern Luzon, Philippines. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 141, 416–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.006
Philippine Institute for Development Studies (2021). [ANALYSIS] Part 1: Survey says or not. https://pids.gov.ph/details/analysis-part-1-survey-says-or-not
Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). (2020). Highlights of the National Capital Region (NCR) Population - 2020 Census of Population and Housing. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/population-and-housing/node/165009
Piracci, G., Boncinelli, F. & Casini, L. (2023) Investigating Consumer Preferences for Sustainable Packaging Through a Different Behavioural Approach: A Random Regret Minimization Application. Environ Resource Econ 86, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00785-3
Popovic, I., Bossink, B. A., van der Sijde, P. C., & Fong, C. Y. (2020). Why are consumers willing to pay more for liquid foods in environmentally friendly packaging? A dual attitudes perspective. Sustainability, 12(7), 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072812
Schachter, J. A., & Karasik, R. (2022). Plastic Pollution Policy Country Profile: Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Plastic-Pollution-Policy-Country
Setiowati, R., & Liem, Y. (2018). Impact of packaging design on perceived quality, perceived value, brand preference, and repurchase intention of candy products in Jakarta. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. ISSN (Print): 0128-7702. ISSN (Electronic): 2231-8534.
Shimul, A. S., & Cheah, I. (2023). Consumers' preference for eco-friendly packaged products: pride vs guilt appeal. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 41(2), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2022-0197
Sitanggang, J.M., Sinulingga, S., & Fachruddin, K.A. (2019). Analysis Of The Effect Of Product Quality On Customer Satisfaction And Customer Loyalty Of Indihome ATPT Telkom Regional 1 Sumatera, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Analysis-Of-The-Effect-Of-Product-Quality-On-And-Of-Sitanggang-Sinulingga
Slaba, M. (2020). Multiple regression model of the consumers’ price sensitivity. Economic Annals-XXI, 183(5-6), 60-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V183-06
Soegoto, D. S. (2018). Analysis of eco-friendly preference and eco-friendly product quality; their implications to customer satisfaction. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 434, 012164. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/434/1/012164
Tanpoco, M. R., Antonio, R. T. A., Bergado, L. a. A., Chua, A. T. C., Onia, M. M. G., & Caminong, J. M. (2023). Unraveling sustainable consumption Patterns: Insights from the Filipino consumer landscape. Journal of Namibian Studies, 35, 1404–1420. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v35i.3675
Wang, H. (2020). Research on Product Quality Improvement Strategy of Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Double Preference. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 428. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200401.039
Wei Q, Lv D, Lin Y, Zhu D, Liu S, Liu Y. (2023). Influence of Utilitarian and Hedonic Attributes on Willingness to Pay Green Product Premiums and Neural Mechanisms in China: An ERP Study. Sustainability. 15(3):2403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032403
Yokokawa, N., Amasawa, E., & Hirao, M. (2021). Design assessment framework for food packaging integrating consumer preferences and environmental impact. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1514-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.027
Yuen, E. F. T., & Chan, S. S. L. (2010). The effect of retail service quality and product quality on customer loyalty. The Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 17(3–4), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1057/dbm.2010.13
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tricia Rheinne A. Del Prado, Elizabeth F. Molinos, Ronaldo R. Cabauatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.