COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY PLAYERS IN THE BEER INDUSTRY IN KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.8Keywords:
competition, competitive strategies, drivers of competition, sustainable competitive advantage, SWOT analysis.Abstract
Purpose: The focus of this study was on assessment of competitive strategies adopted by players in the beer industry in Kenya
Methodology: The study adopted a cross sectional descriptive survey research design. There are 11 players in beer industry operating in Kenya. The research therefore took the form of a census study covering all the players in the beer industry in Kenya since the population of 11 firms was considered small enough. Eleven questionnaires were given out though only 10 were considered fit for data analysis. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Findings indicated that players in beer industry in Kenya were faced by several forces that shape competition. These included competitive rivalry, threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and customers, globalization, regulation and information technology. Players in beer industry in Kenya used cost leadership strategy as a competitive strategy since they attempt to reduce their operational costs in order to deliver the product at the lowest prices. It was also possible to conclude that players in beer industry in Kenya use differentiation as a competitive strategy since they have invested in product research. Players in beer industry in Kenya also used focus as a competitive strategy since they have products for different types of consumers. It was also possible to infer from this study that players in beer industry in Kenya used value disciplines as a competitive strategy.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommended that players in beer industry should carry out constant environment scanning so as to be able to identify the various forces that affect their operations. In addition, they needed to adopt strategic planning as a tool for planning against any unforeseen events that may destabilize the operations of the company. Finally, it was recommended that these players needed to continue using the various competitive strategies. However, they also needed to factor in the concept of strategy fit by considering the internal capabilities and resources of the firm.
Downloads
References
Aosa, E. (1992). An empirical investigation of aspects of strategy formulation and implementation within, large private manufacturing companies in Kenya. (PhD dissertations, University of Srath Clyde Scotland unpublished).
Aumann, R. (1985), What is game theory trying to accomplish? K. Arrow and S. Honkapohja (eds), Frontiers of Economics, Basil Blackwell
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 99-120
Bowman, C. (2008). The Bowman's strategic clock and hybrid competitive strategies.
D'Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin A. (1990). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D industry with spillovers: Erratum, American Economic Review, June.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K., (2000). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (2003). Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing, New York, N.Y: Wiley.
Jacquemin, A. (1987). The new industrial organisation, MIT Press.
Johnson, G., & Scholes K. (1998). Exploring techniques of analysis and evaluation in strategic management. Pearson Education ltd.
Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2002): Exploring corporate strategy, (6thed.). Prentice Hall Incl.
Karemu, C. K. (1993). An Investigation in the state of strategic management in the retailing industry: A case of supermarkets in Nairobi (Unpublished MBA research Project, School of Business, University of Nairobi).
Kay, J. (1999). Resource based strategy, Financial Times (September 27, 1999). New York N.Y: McGraw - Hill
Kibera, F.N. (1996). Introduction to Business: A Kenyan perspective, Nairobi, Kenya Literature Review
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1988). Economic theories of the firm: past, present, and future. Canadian Journal of Economics, 444-458.
Molina, M. A., Pino, I. B. & Rodriguez, A. C. (2004). Industry, management, capabilities and firms' competitiveness: an empirical contribution. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 265-281.
Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121-146
Oketch (2006). The role of management ability and competence in the success of a chosen competitive strategy. Unpublished Master thesis
Ong'olo, D. (2004). Distribution restraints: Experiences in the beer and soft drinks industries in Africa. April 2004. Training Workshop report prepared for WTO
Person I. & Robinson (1997). Strategic management: Formulation, implementation and control. (6thed.). London, McGraw Hill.
Phusavat, K., & Kanchana, R. (2007). Competitive priorities of manufacturing firms in Thailand", Industrial Management and Data Systems, 7(7), 979-996.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, New York, Free Press.
Porter, M. E., (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York, Free Press.
Porter, M. E., (2004). Competitive advantage, New York, Free Press
Schumpeter, J. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, Allen and Unwin
Thompson, A., & Strickland, A. J. (1993). Strategic management. concepts and cases, NewYork N.Y:. Irwin
Thompson, A., & Strickland, J. (1998). Crafting and implementing strategy, texts and readings, (10thed.). New York, McGraw Hill.
Treacy, F. & Wiersema H. (1993). Value disciplines. London, Lite Press.
Tuan, N. M. & Yoshi, T. (2010). Organizational capabilities, competitive advantage and performance in supporting industries in Vietnam. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 15(1), 1-21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.