The Impact of Communication Technology on Family Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jcomm.1981Keywords:
Technoference, Digital Boundaries, Family Dynamics, Face-to-Face Interactions, Digital LiteracyAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to investigate the impact of communication technology on family dynamics.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the impact of communication technology on family dynamics. Preliminary empirical review revealed that communication technology had a profound and complex impact on family dynamics, highlighting both its benefits and challenges. It found that technology often led to decreased face-to-face interactions and increased feelings of isolation, negatively affecting relationship satisfaction and increasing conflicts. Parents' technology use played a crucial role, with active mediation and co-viewing fostering a cohesive family environment, while excessive use by adolescents was linked to anxiety and depression. The study emphasized the need for balanced technology use, recommending open communication, clear guidelines, and "tech-free" zones to enhance family relationships and well-being.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Information Processing Theory, Family Systems Theory and Media Richness Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the impact of communication technology on family dynamics. The study contributed to theoretical knowledge by introducing concepts like "technoference" and emphasizing the socio-cultural context of technology use. It provided practical guidelines for family therapists and counselors to manage technology use within families, such as setting boundaries and promoting face-to-face interactions. The study also recommended that policymakers develop educational programs for digital literacy, encourage workplaces to respect family time, and collaborate with technology companies to create features supporting healthy technology use. Additionally, it highlighted the need for ongoing research funding to explore the impact of emerging technologies on family dynamics.
Downloads
References
Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Family communication: Theory and research. SAGE Publications.
Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use and social connectedness over the life course. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 589-602.
Costa, R. R., & Silva, M. T. (2015). Family dynamics in Brazilian households: Cultural and socioeconomic influences. Journal of Family Studies, 21(3), 325-341.
Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K., & Day, R. D. (2014). Media time= family time: Positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 663-688.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
Fosco, G. M., & Grych, J. H. (2013). Capturing the family context of emotion regulation: A family systems model comparison approach. Journal of Family Issues, 34(4), 557-578.
Hampton, K. N., & Welsh, E. (2019). Digital media and the reconfiguration of parent-child relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(5), 1098-1110.
Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital technology and relationships: A research review. Family Science Review, 17(2), 72-91.
Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2013). The Couple and Family Technology Framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. Routledge.
Hwang, K. K., & He, F. (2015). Modernization of Confucian values: Impacts of communication technology. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(5), 456-469.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2013). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 15(6), 987-1005.
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). "Technoference": The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). "Technoference": The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98.
Mokomane, Z. (2013). Social protection as a mechanism for family protection in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(3), 248-259.
Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2016). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 38(1), 64-80.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440.
Quan-Haase, A., & Neves, B. B. (2018). Exploring the use of communication technologies by older adults in Brazil: How does digital inclusion contribute to social inclusion? Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1253-1268.
Radesky, J. S., Christakis, D. A. (2016). Increased screen time: Implications for early childhood development and behavior. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591.
Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyn, M., & Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), e843-e849. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703
Stockdale, L. A., & Coyne, S. M. (2019). Parenting, social media, and the digital generation: The impact of parents' and adolescents' social media use on family dynamics. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019
Thompson, R. A., & Goodman, M. (2019). The role of digital communication in adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(2), 134-143.
Tsuji, I., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Changing Japanese family dynamics: Implications of demographic shifts and digital communication. Journal of Family Issues, 37(12), 1675-1693.
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Media use is linked to lower psychological well-being: Evidence from three datasets. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 338-354.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). America's families and living arrangements: 2019. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2019/demo/families/cps-2019.html
Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., & Zgourou, E. (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387-392.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221-243.
Walther, J. B. (2012). Social Information Processing Theory (CMC). In K. O. Mikkelson (Ed.), Theories of Human Communication (10th ed., pp. 379-391). Waveland Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Janet Kyalo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
