Climate Diplomacy and Geopolitics: Exploring the Role of Climate Policy in International Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.1546Abstract
Purpose: The main objective of this study was to explore the role of climate policy in international relations.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to climate policy and geopolitics. Preliminary empirical review revealed that climate diplomacy and geopolitics are inextricably linked in the 21st century, with climate policy playing a central role in shaping international relations. The urgency of addressing climate change has forced nations to collaborate and confront shared challenges, while also introducing new dimensions of competition and complexity. Non-state actors, climate justice considerations, and the evolving global energy landscape all contribute to the intricate tapestry of climate diplomacy. The future of international relations will depend, to a large extent, on how effectively nations navigate these challenges and seize the opportunities presented by climate action to build a more sustainable and equitable world.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Realism theory, Complex Interdependence theory and the Regime theory may be used to anchor future studies on climate policy. The study recommended promotion of multilateralism, incorporation of climate into foreign policy, supporting vulnerable nations, engagement of non-state actors and incorporation of climate security.
Downloads
References
Afreximbank. (2021). Afreximbank projects 56% rise in intra-African trade by 2022. Retrieved from https://www.afreximbank.com/africa-trade/.
Aykut, S. C., & Foyer, J. (2016). Globalising green: The role of non-state actors in the environmental diplomacy of emerging powers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 365-392.
Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2016). The road to Paris: Contending climate governance discourses in the post-COP21 landscape. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(6), 585-607.
Baldwin, R., & Evenett, S. J. (2019). Introduction. In R. Baldwin & S. J. Evenett (Eds.), Brexit and the global economy (pp. 1-4). CEPR Press.
Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2006). Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12(2), 141-159.
Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope? American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288-319. doi:10.1017/ajil.2016.1
Brautigam, D., & Tang, X. (2019). Economic statecraft in China's new overseas special economic zones: Soft power, business or resource security? Journal of Contemporary China, 28(116), 295-313. doi:10.1080/10670564.2019.1579723
Bremberg, N. (2023). OSCE and climate security: diplomatic practice in a changing geopolitical context. International Affairs, 99(3), 1149-1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad078
Elliott, L. (2013). Climate diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (pp. 840-856). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0048
Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107-1125.
Gebrewold, B., & Mekonnen, D. (2018). Africa's Agenda 2063 and the Sustainable Development Goals: A comparative analysis of challenges and gaps. Journal of African Union Studies, 7(3-4), 89-108. doi:10.31920/2050-4290/2018/7n3-4a4
Ghebremedhin, T. G. (2017). IGAD and the conflict in South Sudan: Beyond mediation to a more comprehensive conflict transformation framework. African Security, 10(1), 24-48. doi:10.1080/19392206.2016.1274083
Global Carbon Project. (2021). Global Carbon Atlas. Retrieved from https://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions
GOV.UK. (2021). UK greenhouse gas emissions, provisional statistics: 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-greenhouse-gas-emissions-provisional-statistics-2020
Gupta, A., & Arts, B. (2017). Diplomacy as usual? Diplomatic practices and the EU's role as a global climate actor. Climate Policy, 17(1), 19-38.
Hughes, C. W. (2018). The United States-Japan alliance and regional security in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 5(3), 243-262. DOI: 10.1177/2347797018803219
Jayaram, D. (2021). Climate Diplomacy and Emerging Economies: India as a Case Study. Routledge.
Johnson, J., & Noguchi, Y. (2018). What's Behind The Tariffs Trump Just Imposed? NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2018/03/22/595897412/what-s-behind-the-tariffs-trump-just-imposed
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown and Company.
Krasner, S. D. (1983). International Regimes. Cornell University Press.
Matsuhashi, R., Tachiiri, K., & Ito, A. (2018). Evaluation of Japan's greenhouse gas emissions (1990-2013) using a regional model with a process-based land surface scheme. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25857-4
Ministry of Finance Japan. (2021). Trade Statistics of Japan. https://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2020). Japan's Contribution to the United Nations. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). (2021). NATO's essential role. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/nato_2020/strategic-role/index.html
Oberthür, S., & Ott, H. E. (2017). The Paris Agreement and the adoption of loss and damage at COP21 in Paris. Climate Policy, 17(1), 1-7.
O'Sullivan, M., Overland, I., & Sandalow, D. (2018). Undiplomatic action: A practical guide to the new politics and geopolitics of climate change. Brookings Institution.
Schunz, S. (2021). The European Union’s Strategic Turn in Climate Diplomacy: ‘Multiple Bilateralism’ as Strategic Hedging? College of Europe Policy Briefs.
Schunz, S. (2021). The European Union’s Strategic Turn in Climate Diplomacy: ‘Multiple Bilateralism’ as a Response to Geopolitical Change? European Diplomacy Papers, 4(2021), 1-28. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/edp_4-2021_schunz_0_0.pdf
UK Ministry of Defence. (2020). UK armed forces operational statistics, April 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/876794/UK_Armed_Forces_Operational_Statistics_April_2020.pdf
United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Waveland Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kenneth Munge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
