Determinants Influencing the Performance of Child Welfare Protection Project: A Case of Charitable Children Institutions in Kilifi County, Kenya

Authors

  • Aleo Nipher Apeli University of Nairobi University of Nairobi University of Nairobi University of Nairobi
  • Dr. Johnbosco M. Kisimbii University of Nairobi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jepm.503

Keywords:

Training, stakeholder engagement, financial resources, monitoring and evaluation, child welfare protection project and charitable children institutions

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the key determinants influencing the performance of child welfare protection project in Kilifi county, Kenya. The study aimed to achieve the following objectives: to examine the extent to which training of workers influences performance of child welfare protection project, to determine the extent to which stakeholder engagement influences performance of child welfare protection project, to establish the extent to which availability of financial resources influences performance of child welfare protection project and to assess how monitoring and evaluation approaches influences the performance of child welfare protection project.

Methodology: The study adopted the descriptive research design.  The target population was 20 directors and 110 project workers which summed to 130 persons. The study sampled 101 respondents which included (15) directors and (86) project workers in the social department of 15 child charitable institutions. Purposive sampling and proportionate sampling were utilized respectively. Primary data was collected by use of close ended questionnaire and the return rate was 70%. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version) latest version. The study results were presented through frequency tables and narratives analysis.

Results: The findings clearly depict that all determiners: training of workers, stakeholder engagement, availability of financial resources and monitoring and evaluation approaches were present in child welfare projects constituting of the composite mean of 3.9468, 2.988, 3.6798 and 3,9434 respectively while the dependent variable had a composite mean of 4.34. Hypothesis was tested on each alternative as per the objective using the simple Chi square test determined that training of workers had no significant influence on the performance of child welfare protection projects while stakeholder engagement, availability of financial resources and monitoring and evaluation had a significant influence on the performance of child welfare protection projects.

Unique contribution to theory, policy and practice: The study recommends that further research be conducted on training to provide more insight of this variable. The study recommends training of workers through university-agency partnerships be fortified to bring about new ideas and skills among project workers in addition, firms should ensure child welfare practitioners are endowed with valuable M&E skills and suitable approaches to meet the set target and objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aleo Nipher Apeli, University of Nairobi University of Nairobi University of Nairobi University of Nairobi

Postgraduate Student: The University of Nairobi 

Dr. Johnbosco M. Kisimbii, University of Nairobi

Lecturer: School of Open and Distance Learning, University of Nairobi

References

Anderson, G. R., Williams-Hecksel, C., & de Guzman, A. (2020). The stipend student commitment to child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(1), 122-138.

Berk., L.E. (2000). Child Development (5th Ed.) Boston: Ally and Bacon 23-28

Bogdanova, E., Cook, L. J., & Kulmala, M. (2018). The carrot or the stick? Constraints and opportunities of Russia's CSO policy.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological review, 101(4), 568.

Dalli, C., Miller, L., & Urban, M. (2012). Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession. In Early childhood grows up (pp. 3-19). Springer, Dordrecht.

Dodds, S., & Hess, A. C. (2020). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research. Journal of Service Management.

Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency theory of organizations. Thousand oaks. Sage publishers.

Engler, K. (2007). A look at how the ecological systems theory may be inadequate. A Capstone project Article. Winona State University. Research gate publishers

Fargion,S. (2012). Synergies and tensions in child protection and parent support: Policy lines and practitioners' cultures. Wiley online library

Fenrich, J., Galizzi, P., & Higgins, T. E. (Eds.). (2011). The future of African customary law. Cambridge University Press.

Forrest, L., Shen Miller, D. S., & Elman, N. S. (2008). Psychology trainees with competence problems: From individual to ecological conceptualizations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2(4), 183.

Garbarino, J. (1997). The human ecology of child maltreatment: A conceptual model for research. The Journal of marriage and family, Vol 39, No4 pp.721-735 National council on Family Relations Publishers

Gordon, L. N. (2015). Child participation in Jamaica: cultural reality versus idealism. Social and Economic Studies, 49-74.

Lamhauge, N., Lanzi, E., & Agrawala, S. (2013). The use of indicators for monitoring and evaluation of adaptation: lessons from development cooperation agencies. Climate and Development, 5(3), 229-241.

Monea, J., & Thomas, A. (June, 2011). Unintended Pregnancy and Taxpayer spending: Perspectives on sexual and Reproductive health 43: 88-93. doi: 10.1363/4308811. PMD21651707. Wiley online library

Mugenda, O.M., & Mugenda, B.G. (2015). Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mupedziswa, R., & Sinkamba, R. P. (2014). Social work education and training in Southern and East Africa: Yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Ndulo, M. (2011). African customary law, customs, and women's rights. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(1), 87-120.

Omondi, S. (2014). A Critique of the Statutory Provisions on Child Sexual Abuse in Kenya. http://41.204.183.105/handle/11732/351

Sepúlveda, M., & Nyst, C. (2012). The human rights approach to social protection. Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.

Sidze, E. M., Pradhan, J., Beekink, E., Maina, T. M., & Maina, B. W. (2013). Reproductive health financing in Kenya: an analysis of national commitments, donor assistance, and the resources tracking process. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(42), 139-150.

Sidze, E. M., Pradhan, J., Beekink, E., Maina, T. M., & Maina, B. W. (2013). Reproductive health financing in Kenya: an analysis of national commitments, donor assistance, and the resources tracking process. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(42), 139-150.

UNICEF, Accra (2014). Child Protection baseline report: UNICEF Annual report

UNICEF. (2005). The impact of conflict on women and girls in west and central Africa and the UNICEF response. Unicef.

Wang, X., & Yang, W. (2019). Water quality monitoring and evaluation using remote sensing techniques in China: a systematic review. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 5(1), 47-56.

Yuen-Tsang, A., & Healy, L. M. (2019). Shaping the Global Trajectory: The Leadership Role of International Organizations. In Strategic Leadership in Social Work Education (pp. 117-134). Springer, Cham

Downloads

Published

2020-12-22

How to Cite

Apeli, A. N., & Kisimbii, D. J. M. (2020). Determinants Influencing the Performance of Child Welfare Protection Project: A Case of Charitable Children Institutions in Kilifi County, Kenya. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, 5(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.47941/jepm.503

Issue

Section

Articles