Sexist Humour and the Acceptance of Sexual-Aggression Myths: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Humour Beliefs

Authors

  • Husna Akbar Central Remedial Clinic, Ireland; Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan
  • Kinza Naseem Elahi House of Pebbles; Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan
  • Maliha Kaiser University of Messina, Italy; Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan
  • Umama Arshad Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan
  • Khudeja Mehmood Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jgrs.2856

Keywords:

Sexist Jokes, Rape Myth Acceptance, Cavalier Humour Beliefs, Gender, Sexism, Pakistan.

Abstract

Purpose: The present research aimed to explore the impact of sexist humour on the acceptance of sexual aggression myths, with a specific focus on the moderating roles of the joke teller’s gender and cavalier humour beliefs (CHB).

Methodology: A quantitative experimental design was used with a 2 (joke type: sexist, neutral) × 2 (joke teller’s gender: male, female) fully between subjects structure. A total of 308 Pakistani university students aged 18 to 29 were recruited through convenience and voluntary response sampling. Participants were presented with joke stimuli via an online Qualtrics survey and completed standardized measures assessing their humour beliefs and acceptance of sexual aggression myths.

Findings: Contrary to the original hypothesis, exposure to sexist jokes compared to neutral jokes resulted in lower acceptance of sexual aggression myths. Additionally, participants with medium to high CHB found sexist jokes significantly more amusing when told by a female joke teller. These findings diverge from Western literature that typically reports reinforcing effects of sexist humour, and instead suggest a more complex relationship between humour, identity, and cultural context. In collectivist societies, such humour may activate moral reflection or critique rather than reinforcement of harmful beliefs.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This research contributes new insights into how humour operates within a South Asian cultural framework. By demonstrating that sexist humour may, under certain conditions, reduce the acceptance of harmful myths, it challenges dominant theories developed in Western contexts. These findings offer practical implications for awareness campaigns and educational efforts in societies where humour is socially embedded. They also inform policy by emphasizing the importance of culturally grounded approaches to combating gender based prejudice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Husna Akbar, Central Remedial Clinic, Ireland; Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

BACP Counsellor

Former Undergraduate Student, Institute of Professional Psychology

Kinza Naseem Elahi, House of Pebbles; Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

Associate Clinical Psychologist
Former Undergraduate Student, Institute of Professional Psychology

Maliha Kaiser, University of Messina, Italy; Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

Postgraduate Student
Former Undergraduate Student, Institute of Professional Psychology

Umama Arshad, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

Postgraduate Student,

Institute of Professional Psychology

Khudeja Mehmood, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

Senior Lecturer,

Institute of Professional Psychology

References

Ahmed, S., & Wahab, J. A. (2014). Animation and Socialization Process: Gender Role Portrayal on Cartoon Network. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 44.

Ali, T. S., Krantz, G., Gul, R., Asad, N., Johansson, E., & Mogren, I. (2011). Gender Roles and Their Influence on Life Prospects for Women in Urban Karachi, Pakistan: A Qualitative Study. Global Health Action, 4(1), 7448.

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

Bohner, G., Lipińska, A., Megías, J. L., Schirch, C., Sempere, M.-J., Weiss, A., & Zöllner. L. (2020). AMMSA-21: Presentation and validation of the revised Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression scale [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University.

Bohner, G., Siebler, F., & Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social Norms and the Likelihood of Raping: Perceived Rape Myth Acceptance of Others Affects Men's Rape Proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 286-297.

Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, Emotion, and Expression. Handbook of Emotions, 2, 338-349.

Cowan, G. (2000). Women's Hostility toward Women and Rape and Sexual Harassment Myths. Violence against Women, 6(3), 238-246.

Dawn News. (2019, April 9). Lums Hopes for 'Culture Of Respect' on Campus as Sexist Facebook Group by Students is Exposed. https://www.dawn.com/news/1474960/lums-hopes-for-culture-of-respect-on-campus- as-sexist-facebook-group-by-students-is-exposed.

Dien, D. S. F. (1982). A Chinese Perspective on Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development. Developmental Review, 2(4), 331-341.

DW News. (2019, September 23). Violence against Women on the Rise in Pakistan.https://www.dw.com/en/violence-against-women-on-the-rise-in-pakistan/a-50550672

Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2007). The Rating of Sexist Humor under Time Pressure as an Indicator of Spontaneous Sexist Attitudes. Sex Roles, 57(9-10), 651-660.

Ford, T. E. (2000). Effects of Sexist Humor on Tolerance of Sexist Events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094-1107. doi:10.1177/01461672002611006

Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor: A Prejudiced Norm Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1), 79-94.

Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than “Just a Joke”: The Prejudice-Releasing Function of Sexist Humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159-170.

Ford, T. E., Richardson, K., & Petit, W. E. (2015). Disparagement Humor and Prejudice: Contemporary Theory and Research. Humor, 28(2), 171-186.

Friesdorf, R., Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas: A Process Dissociation Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696-713.

Fumagalli, M., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Marceglia, S., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Zago, S., Lucchiari, C., Consonni, D., Nordio, F., Pravettoni, G., Cappa, D., & Priori, A. (2010). Gender-Related Differences in Moral Judgments. Cognitive processing, 11(3), 219-226.

Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale: Development and Validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 33(5), 422-440.

Hodson, G., & MacInnis, C. C. (2016). Derogating Humor as a Delegitimization Strategy in Intergroup Contexts. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(1), 63.

Hodson, G., Rush, J., & MacInnis, C. C. (2010). A Joke is Just a Joke (Except When it isn't): Cavalier Humor Beliefs Facilitate the Expression of Group Dominance Motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 660.

Iconis, R. (2008). Rape Myth Acceptance In College Students: A Literature Review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 1(2), 47-52.

Jia, F., & Krettenauer, T. (2017). Recognizing Moral Identity as a Cultural Construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 412.

Johnson, P.O. & Fay, L.C. (1950). The Johnson-Neyman Technique, its Theory and Application. Psychometrika, 15, 349-367. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288864

Lyons, M., Rowe, A., Waddington, R., & Brewer, G. Situational and Dispositional Factors in Rape Cognitions: The Roles of Social Media and the Dark Triad Traits. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260520985499.

Masequesmay, G. (2009). Sexism. In J. O'Brien (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and society (pp. 749-751). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412964517.n378

O’Connor, L. E. (2010). Guilt. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Paludi, M. A., & Barickman, R. B. (1991). Academic and Workplace Sexual Harassment: A Resource Manual. Suny Press.

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556– 563.

Prusaczyk, E. (2018). Women’s Internalization and Rejection of Sexist Humour. [Master’sThesis, Brock University]. http://dr.library.brocku.ca/handle/10464/13650

Prusaczyk, E., & Hodson, G. (2020). “To the moon, Alice”: Cavalier Humor Beliefs and Women's Reactions to Aggressive and Belittling Sexist Jokes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103973.

Rashad, S., & Azher, M. (2018). "Women in Jokes”: A Linguistic Analysis of Jokes on Pakistani Social Media in Light of the General Theory of Verbal Humour. Pakistan Journal of Women's Studies, 25(2).

Romero-Sánchez, M., Carretero-Dios, H., Megías, J. L., Moya, M., & Ford, T. E. (2016). Sexist Humor and Rape Proclivity: The Moderating Role of Joke Teller Gender and Severity of Sexual Assault. Violence against Women, 23(8), 951-972. doi:10.1177/1077801216654017

Romero-Sánchez, M., Durán, M., Carretero-Dios, H., Megías, J. L., & Moya, M. (2010). Exposure to Sexist Humor and Rape Proclivity: The Moderator Effect of Aversiveness Ratings. Journal of interpersonal violence, 25(12), 2339-2350.

Rothschild, Z. K., & Keefer, L. A. (2017). A Cleansing Fire: Moral Outrage Alleviates Guilt and Buffers Threats to One’s Moral Identity. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 209- 229.

Rouhana, N. N., & Korper, S. H. (1996). Dealing with the Dilemmas Posed by Power Asymmetry in Intergroup Conflict. Negotiation Journal, 12(4), 353-366.

Senthilingam, M. (2017, November 29). Sexual Harassment: How it stands around the Globe. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/25/health/sexual-harassment-violence-abuse- global-levels/index.html

Shah, B. (2017, August 10). Internalised Misogyny. Daily Times. https://dailytimes.com.pk/121513/internalised-misogyny/

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043

Sriwattanakomen, N. (2017). Who's Laughing Now? The Effects of Sexist and Rape Humor. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 22(2).

Thacker, R. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Understanding Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: The Influence of Power and Politics within the Dyadic Interaction of Harasser and Target. Human Resource Management Review 1, 23-37

Thomae, M., & Viki, G. T. (2013). Why did the woman cross the road? The effect of sexist humor on men's rape proclivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(3), 250.

Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853

United Nations Development Programme. (2020, March 5). Almost 90% of Men/Women Globally Are Biased Against Women. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/newscentre/news/2020/Gender_Social_ Norms_Index_2020.html

World Population Review (2020) Rape Statistics by Country 2020.https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/rape-statistics-by country

Zia, A. (2007). Media and Gender: Pakistani Perspective. 16th AMIC Annual Conference Zikmund, W. G., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Essentials of Marketing Research. South Western/CENGAGE Learning

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Akbar, H., Elahi, K. N., Kaiser, M., Arshad, U., & Mehmood, K. (2025). Sexist Humour and the Acceptance of Sexual-Aggression Myths: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Humour Beliefs. Journal of Gender Related Studies, 6(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.47941/jgrs.2856

Issue

Section

Articles