The Impact of Leadership Styles on Academic Performance in Thai Higher Education Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/hrlj.1743Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the influence of leadership styles on academic performance within Thai Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), amidst a rapidly evolving global higher education landscape. Recognizing the pivotal role of leadership in adapting to change, fostering innovation, and sustaining academic excellence, this research aims to discern which leadership practices most effectively enhance academic performance in the Thai context. By integrating various leadership theories and examining their applicability in Thai HEIs, the study identifies the relationship between leadership styles and academic outcomes, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of leadership's impact on educational success.
Methodology: Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative analysis of academic performance indicators across different institutions with qualitative interviews from a diverse range of university administrators, deans, and department heads. This methodology allows for a comprehensive exploration of how leadership styles correlate with academic performance metrics.
Findings: Findings suggest that transformational leadership is significantly associated with higher academic performance, characterized by its emphasis on vision, communication, and employee motivation. In contrast, transactional leadership styles, focusing on rewards and penalties, show a less pronounced impact. The study also highlights the importance of contextual factors, including cultural, economic, and political influences, in shaping effective leadership practices within Thai HEIs.
Unique contributor to theory, policy and practice: The primary innovation of this research lies in its contextual examination of leadership styles within the Thai higher education sector, providing insights into the nuanced ways in which leadership can influence academic performance in a specific cultural and institutional framework. This understanding is vital for formulating strategies aimed at enhancing leadership effectiveness and, consequently, improving student academic outcomes in Thai higher education settings.
Downloads
References
Dakowska, D. (2018). Between Competition Imperative and Europeanisation. The Case of Higher Education Reform in Poland. HAL.
Osman, Z. (2020). Indirect Relationship among Leadership Styles, Self-Efficacy and Academic Employees’ Performance in Malaysian Online Distance Learning Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V10-I8/7717
Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., & Naccache, H. (2024). Leadership styles and AI acceptance in academic libraries in higher education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2024.102849
Uzunsaf Yamak, Ö., & Eyüpoğlu, Ş. Z. (2018). Leadership Styles of Hotel Managers in Northern Cyprus: Which Style is Dominant? International Journal of Organizational Leadership.
Khan, I., Idris, M., & Amin, R. U. (2021). Leadership style and performance in higher education: the role of organizational justice. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1854868
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
Yukl, G. (1999). An Evaluation of Conceptual Weaknesses in Transformational and Charismatic Leadership Theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Reexamining the Components of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259-298.
Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2001). Leadership in Organizations. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 8616-8620). Amsterdam: Elsevier
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.
Pongsiri, C. (2018). Leadership Styles and Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 191-198.
Charoenratanakul, P., & Khamrang, T. (2019). The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Academic Performance: A Study of Thai Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Leadership Studies, 13(2), 78-92.
Srisukhumbowornchai, N. (2017). Leadership Styles and Their Impact on Organizational Performance: A Case Study of Thai Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 495-510.
Sarakun, S., & Wongwanich, S. (2020). The Effects of Leadership Styles on Faculty Job Satisfaction and Academic Performance in Thai Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 232-248.
Siribanpitak, P., & Pongput, T. (2016). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership Styles and Academic Performance: A Case Study of Thai Universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(5), 542-556.
Laohajaratsang, T., & Phonphaisan, T. (2018). The Role of Transactional Leadership in Academic Performance Improvement: Evidence from Thai Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 33(1), 72-88.
Boonlertvanich, K., & Vathanophas, V. (2019). Impact of Situational Leadership on Academic Performance: A Study of Thai Higher Education Institutions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(5), 730-748.
Pumipuntu, K., & Sukwadi, R. (2017). The Relationship between Leadership Styles and Organizational Performance: A Case Study of Thai Private Universities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(3), 409-423.
Sae-Loon, S., & Chailungka, P. (2016). The Influence of Participative Leadership on Academic Performance: A Study of Thai Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 4(2), 178-192.
Thongsri, N., & Jintanapakanont, J. (2018). Impact of Authentic Leadership on Academic Performance: A Study of Thai Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Management in Education, 12(1), 1-17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jiacheng ZHONG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
