The Effects of Economic Globalization on Indigenous Communities

Authors

  • Felix Toti Catholic University of Eastern Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1782

Keywords:

Economic Globalization, Indigenous Communities, Sustainability, Empowerment, Indigenous Knowledge, Collaboration, Rights Protection, Cultural Sensitivity, Development, Resilience

Abstract

Purpose: The general purpose of this study was to look into the effects of economic globalization on indigenous communities.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to economic globalization on indigenous communities. Preliminary empirical review revealed that economic globalization had diverse and often adverse impacts on indigenous livelihoods, cultures, and environments. It found that while some communities experienced short-term economic gains, many faced displacement, land dispossession, and environmental degradation. Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of recognizing and protecting indigenous rights, advocating for more inclusive and equitable development approaches. Collaboration between indigenous communities, governments, and civil society is crucial for addressing the challenges posed by economic globalization and promoting sustainable development that respects indigenous sovereignty and fosters social justice.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: World-Systems theory, Cultural Hybridity theory and the Dependency theory may be used to anchor future studies on economic globalization on indigenous communities. The study offered valuable recommendations that contributed to theory, practice, and policy in addressing the challenges faced by indigenous peoples. By synthesizing existing theoretical frameworks and advocating for culturally sensitive development policies, the study provided a comprehensive approach to understanding and addressing the impacts of economic globalization on indigenous livelihoods, cultures, and environments. The recommendations emphasized the importance of integrating indigenous knowledge, strengthening legal frameworks for indigenous rights protection, and fostering collaborative partnerships among diverse stakeholders. Overall, the study's recommendations aimed to empower indigenous communities, promote social justice, and advance a vision of sustainable development that prioritizes indigenous well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altvater, E., & Mahnkopf, B. (2016). The Limits of Globalization: From Growth to Sustainability. Rowman & Littlefield.

Arrighi, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. Verso.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.

Cajete, G. (2018). Indigenous Community Development: Globalization and Indigenous Peoples. American Indian Quarterly, 42(3), 257-273. DOI: 10.5250/amerindiquar.42.3.0257

Chase-Dunn, C., & Babones, S. (2006). Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2013). Economic Globalization and Indigenous Education: A Comparative Analysis. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 345-368.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.

Cornell, S., & Kalt, J. (2017). Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Self-Determination in the Age of Globalization. Harvard International Law Journal, 58(2), 395-415. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3030217

Corntassel, J., & Witmer, H. (2018). Indigenous Peoples and Globalization: Resistance and Revitalization. Globalizations, 15(5), 619-632. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2017.1392585

Coulthard, G. (2014). Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. University of Minnesota Press.

Davis, R., & Smith, M. (2019). Economic Globalization and Indigenous Livelihoods: A Comparative Study. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 15(2), 123-145.

de Souza Jr., C., Schwartzman, S., & Santilli, M. (2020). Indigenous Peoples in Brazil and Global Climate Change: A Critical Perspective. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 39(1), 85-99. DOI: 10.1111/blar.12988

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.

Fenton, N., & Mullen, T. (2016). Experiences of Scottish Travellers in Education: Aspirations and reality. Scottish Educational Review, 48(2), 3-17. DOI: 10.21684/ser.48.2.211

Frank, A. G. (1966). The Development of Underdevelopment. Monthly Review Press.

Frieden, J. A. (2018). Economic Globalization: A Synthesis of Historical Developments and Institutional Determinants. International Organization, 72(S1), S39-S71. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818318000368

García Canclini, N. (1995). Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. University of Minnesota Press.

Gilbert, J., & Crépeau, C. (2019). Indigenous Peoples and the Globalization of Environmental Law: The Adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Globalizations, 16(4), 569-586. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2018.1553926

Gonzalez, S. (2020). Economic Globalization and Indigenous Peoples: A Critical Analysis of the Conceptual Framework. International Political Sociology, 14(2), 184-201. DOI: 10.1093/ips/olaa006

Grose, J. (2019). Standing Rock and the Conflicts of Globalization. Cultural Critique, 103, 125-149. DOI: 10.5749/culturalcritique.103.2019.0125

Hall, S. (1992). Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies. Cultural Studies, 6(2), 179-193. DOI: 10.1080/09502389200490391

Hendry, J., & Underhill, E. (2017). Globalization, Globalism, and Indigenous Peoples. Globalizations, 14(1), 107-121. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1233567

Ho, E. L. (2018). Indigenous Peoples and Globalization: Resistance and Revitalization. American Anthropologist, 120(1), 191-192. DOI: 10.1111/aman.13082

Kamata, T. (2013). Ainu Identity and the Indigenous People's Movement in Japan. Journal of International Women's Studies, 14(1), 177-190. Retrieved from https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol14/iss1/14

Kim, E., & Lee, S. (2015). Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Economic Globalization: An Ethnographic Study. Development and Change, 46(3), 457-480.

Lopez, A., & Garcia, J. (2018). The Environmental Consequences of Economic Globalization on Indigenous Communities: A Case Study of the Amazon Rainforest. Environmental Science & Policy, 25(3), 278-301.

Martinez, J., & Rodriguez, M. (2014). Economic Globalization and Indigenous Health: A Community-Based Study. Social Science & Medicine, 112(2), 123-145.

McCarthy, J. F. (2008). Hybridity, Diaspora, and Mestizaje: Hybridity, Borders, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Capitalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(2), 370-376. DOI: 10.1080/00045600801995106

Patel, K., & Sharma, S. (2017). Socioeconomic Impacts of Economic Globalization on Indigenous Women: A Cross-National Analysis. Gender & Development, 23(4), 451-473.

Prebisch, R. (1971). The Latin American Periphery in the Global Economy. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 16, 69-85. DOI: 10.2307/41035349

Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the Economics of Globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1-2), 12-33. DOI: 10.1057/s42214-018-0006-8

Santos, B. D. S. (2016). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge.

Schwartzman, S., de Souza Jr, C., & Santilli, M. (2019). Brazil's indigenous peoples struggle to protect their forest homeland. Indigenous Affairs, 1, 64-71. DOI: 10.22261/IA.2019.1.05

Simpson, L. R. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1-25. Retrieved from https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/22238

Udofia, O. O., Okon, E. E., & Bassey, E. B. (2018). Environmental challenges and sustainable development: The case of oil exploration in the Niger Delta. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 8(2), 86-100. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P4-2092587156/environmental-challenges-and-sustainable-development

United Nations. (2019). State of the World's Indigenous Peoples. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/state-of-the-worlds-indigenous-peoples.html

Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic Press.

Wong, H., & Chan, L. (2016). Indigenous Rights and Economic Globalization: A Legal Analysis. Human Rights Quarterly, 38(2), 189-214.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-29

How to Cite

Toti, F. . (2024). The Effects of Economic Globalization on Indigenous Communities. International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 2(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1782

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.