The Effectiveness of Inclusive Education Policies for Students with Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1888Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Policies, Disabilities, Professional Development, Transition Services, Transition Planning, Equity, Social Inclusion, Collaboration, Stakeholders, Educational Environments, Resources, Academic SuccessAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to examine the effectiveness of inclusive education policies for students with disabilities.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the effectiveness of inclusive education policies for students with disabilities. Preliminary empirical review revealed that such policies played a vital role in promoting educational inclusion and academic success within mainstream educational settings. Despite encountering challenges such as inadequate resources and negative attitudes, inclusive education policies showed promise in creating equitable learning environments. The study emphasized the importance of addressing systemic barriers, promoting positive attitudes, and continuously monitoring and adapting policies to meet the evolving needs of students with disabilities. Overall, the findings underscored the potential of inclusive education policies to foster academic achievement and social inclusion for students with disabilities, contributing to a more equitable and supportive educational system.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Model of Disability, Ecological Systems theory and Critical Disability theory may be used to anchor future studies on inclusive education policies for students with disabilities. The study provided provided recommendations that enhanced theoretical frameworks, improved practice, and informed policy in inclusive education. It emphasized the importance of refining theoretical understandings of disability, providing professional development for educators, and developing comprehensive transition services for students with disabilities. Additionally, the study advocated for policy reforms that promote equity and social inclusion, fostered collaboration among stakeholders, and called for increased funding and support for inclusive education initiatives. These recommendations contributed to advancing inclusive education by promoting more responsive, equitable, and supportive educational environments for students with disabilities.
Downloads
References
Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2016). Inclusive education policy, law, and practice. In Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 354-369). Routledge.
Avramidis, E., & Kalyva, E. (2014). Inclusion in education: Towards equality for students with disability. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.901197
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2014). Guidance for evaluating inclusive education: Putting theory into practice. University of Manchester.
Booth, T., Ainscow, M., & Kingston, D. (2013). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). CSIE.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793-828). John Wiley & Sons.
CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
College Board. (2020). Total group profile report: SAT Suite of Assessments. Retrieved from https://reports.collegeboard.org/pdf/2020-total-group-sat-suite-assessments-annual-report.pdf
Department for Education. (2020). GCSE and equivalent results: 2019 to 2020 (provisional). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gcse-and-equivalent-results-2019-to-2020-provisional
Education Policy Institute. (2020). Disadvantage gaps narrowing at GCSE but still remain large. Retrieved from https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/disadvantage-gaps-narrowing-at-gcse-but-still-remain-large/
European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2017). Inclusive education in action: Moving beyond discussions of theory and policy to build inclusive systems. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education.
Florian, L., Black-Hawkins, K., Rouse, M., & Jull, S. (2019). A systematic review of approaches to assessing teacher attitudes towards inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(3), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1479295
Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2010.542847
Frederickson, N., Jones, A. P., Warren, L., Deakes, T., Allen, G., Ford, T., & Woods, K. (2018). Executive summary: Evaluation of the social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) programme. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(3), 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1451660
Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., & Broer, S. M. (2014). Challenging the rhetoric: What counts as meaningful inclusive education research? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914532005
Goodley, D. (2014). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hodkinson, A., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2018). Enhancing the inclusion of children and young people with SEN and disabilities through personalizing teaching and learning: The role of teaching assistants. British Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12185
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). (2020). Resultados ENEM 2019. Retrieved from http://portal.inep.gov.br/enem/resultados
Liasidou, A., Kavakli, M., & Powell, S. (2018). From policy to practice: Teachers’ views on inclusion in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(5), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1397789
Loreman, T., & Earle, C. (2014). Examining inclusive education through a capabilities lens. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(10), 1065-1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.881181
Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2014). Inclusive education: A practical guide to supporting diversity in the classroom. Allen & Unwin.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [MEXT]. (2019). White Paper on Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 2019. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/en/publication/statistics/title04/detail04/sdetail04/1416443.htm
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [MEXT]. (2020). School basic survey. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/elsec/title01/detail01/sdetail01/sdetail01/1386485.htm
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2020). SAT trends: Mean scores of SAT test-takers. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_226.40.asp
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2020). Students with disabilities. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i-what-students-know-and-can-do-5f07c754-en.htm
Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2019). Educational attainment in the UK: 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/educationandchildcare/articles/educationalattainmentintheduk/2020
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed., pp. 189-197). Routledge.
Pijl, S. J., & Frostad, P. (2019). A systematic review on inclusive education policy goals and the proportion of students with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms. Educational Research Review, 26, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.001
Reardon, S. F., Kalogrides, D., & Shores, K. A. (2019). The Geography of Racial/Ethnic Test Score Gaps. Educational Researcher, 48(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19831093
Sapon-Shevin, M. (2012). Because we can change the world: A practical guide to building cooperative, inclusive classroom communities. Corwin Press.
Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability studies today and tomorrow. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(2), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12102
Shogren, K. A., & Plotner, A. J. (2019). A systematic review of interventions to support the transition to postsecondary education and employment for youth with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 125-167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318789499
Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2016). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1140793
Slee, R. (2018). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Routledge.
Slee, R., & Allan, J. (2015). Mainstreaming politics: Gender, sexuality, and neoliberalism in education. Gender and Education, 27(7), 789-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1090920
Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., Erwin, E. J., Soodak, L. C., & Shogren, K. A. (2015). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (7th ed.). Pearson.
UNESCO. (2020). In or out: COVID-19 and children’s right to education. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/out-or-covid-19-and-childrens-right-education
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our future, rethinking our learning: A call for a new paradigm of education. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376871
World Bank. (2018). World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30417
World Bank. (2019). Facing forward: Schooling for learning in Africa. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31758
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amerie Obah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
