Digital Divide and Social Inequality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.2083Keywords:
Digital Divide, Social Inequality, Digital Literacy, Digital Infrastructure, Inclusive PoliciesAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to examine digital divide and social inequality.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to digital divide and social inequality. Preliminary empirical review revealed that the digital divide exacerbated social inequalities in education, employment, and healthcare, primarily due to disparities in digital access and literacy. Despite technological advancements, marginalized groups continued to face significant barriers in using digital technologies effectively. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted these issues, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive strategies that included both digital literacy programs and improved access. The study emphasized the importance of targeted interventions and collaborative efforts to bridge the digital divide and promote social equity.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study made significant contributions to theory, practice, and policy. It advanced theoretical frameworks by integrating Knowledge Gap Theory, Social Capital Theory, and Structuration Theory to better understand digital disparities. Practically, it highlighted the need for targeted digital literacy programs and community-based digital hubs. Policy recommendations included prioritizing investments in digital infrastructure, subsidizing digital access for low-income households, and integrating digital literacy into education curricula. The study also emphasized bridging the urban-rural digital divide, enhancing digital equity in education, and developing inclusive digital policies with stakeholder engagement and continuous monitoring.
Downloads
References
Alliance for Affordable Internet (A4AI). (2019). The affordability report 2019. Retrieved from https://a4ai.org/affordability-report/report/2019/
Anderson, M., & Kumar, M. (2019). Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/07/digital-divide-persists-even-as-lower-income-americans-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/
Artiga, S., Orgera, K., & Pham, O. (2020). Disparities in health and health care: Five key questions and answers. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.kff.org
Barros, R. P., Ferreira, F. H. G., & Saavedra, J. (2010). Measuring inequality of opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank.
Bivens, J., Mishel, L., Gould, E., & Shierholz, H. (2018). Raising America’s pay: Why it’s our central economic policy challenge. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org
Boliver, V. (2013). How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities? British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 344-364. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12021
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov
Dickman, S. L., Himmelstein, D. U., & Woolhandler, S. (2017). Inequality and the health-care system in the USA. The Lancet, 389(10077), 1431-1441. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30398-7
Dorn, E., Hancock, B., Sarakatsannis, J., & Viruleg, E. (2020). COVID-19 and learning loss—Disparities grow and students need help. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/covid-19-and-learning-loss-disparities-grow-and-students-need-help
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2020). 2020 Broadband Deployment Report. Retrieved from https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/reports/broadband-progress-reports/2020-broadband-deployment-report
Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office. (2020). White paper on gender equality. Government of Japan. Retrieved from https://www.gender.go.jp
Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195-212. doi:10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3126
Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a "digital underclass" in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253-1270. doi:10.1177/1461444816634676
Hilbert, M. (2016). The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014. Telecommunications Policy, 40(6), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006
Hutchinson, J., Reader, M., & Akhal, A. (2020). Education in England: Annual report 2020. Education Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://epi.org.uk
IBGE. (2019). Continuous national household sample survey: Income from all sources 2018. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2021). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int
ITU. (2020). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020. International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2020.pdf
Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2019). Inequalities in the twenty-first century: Introducing the IFS Deaton Review. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ifs.org.uk
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Stamenov, K., & Dhingra, D. (2016). Digital globalization: The new era of global flows. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flows
Marmot, M., Allen, J., Boyce, T., Goldblatt, P., & Morrison, J. (2020). Health equity in England: The Marmot review 10 years on. Institute of Health Equity. Retrieved from https://www.health.org.uk
McCann, P. (2016). The UK regional-national economic problem: Geography, globalisation and governance. Routledge.
Mishel, L., & Bivens, J. (2021). The state of working America 2020. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2017). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
Nouri, S., Khoong, E. C., Lyles, C. R., & Karliner, L. (2020). Addressing equity in telemedicine for chronic disease management during the Covid-19 pandemic. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0123
OECD. (2015). OECD digital economy outlook 2015. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264232440-en
OECD. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. doi:10.1787/eag-2018-en
OECD. (2020). Income inequality (indicator). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. doi:10.1787/459aa7f1-en
Office for National Statistics. (2020). Gender pay gap in the UK: 2020. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk
Paim, J., Travassos, C., Almeida, C., Bahia, L., & Macinko, J. (2011). The Brazilian health system: History, advances, and challenges. The Lancet, 377(9779), 1778-1797. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8
Park, S. (2017). Digital inequalities in rural Australia: A double jeopardy of remoteness and social exclusion. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 399-407. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.018
Perlman, J. E. (2010). Favela: Four decades of living on the edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford University Press.
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91-116). Russell Sage Foundation.
Resolution Foundation. (2019). Housing outlook Q1 2019. Resolution Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.resolutionfoundation.org
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., ... & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569-582. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses, and outcomes. New Media & Society, 19(6), 944-960. doi:10.1177/1461444815621538
Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2005). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. Yale University Press.
Shirahase, S. (2014). Social inequality in Japan. Routledge.
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526. doi:10.1177/1461444813487959
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Wei, L., & Hindman, D. B. (2018). Does the digital divide matter more? Comparing the effects of new media and old media use on the education-based knowledge gap. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 256-277. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1402524
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kelly Baraka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
