Effectiveness of E-Learning on Students’ Learning Process at Catholic University of Eastern Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.1466Keywords:
Educational Learning Resources, Computer-Based Learning, Traditional Learning Environments, Students’ Learning Process, eLearning ChallengesAbstract
Purpose: The main aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of eLearning on the student’s learning process at the Catholic University of Eastern Africa. The research questions addressed the following areas: how students access educational learning resources on e-learning platforms, how eLearning has been integrated into the process of learning, how eLearning integrations affect students’ learning process, how computer-based learning influences students'’ completion rate at the CUEA, how e-learning and traditional learning environments significantly relate to students’ learning process, the challenges that are associated with e-learning, and the mitigation measures the university is taking to resolve the eLearning challenges.
Methodology: The researcher used an integrated mixed-method approach involving qualitative and quantitative paradigms. Probability and non-probability sampling techniques were used. The target population for the research was 816 out of which, 260 respondents were sampled. From the sampled population, 218 participated in the research making an 85% return rate. The hypothesis was tested using chi-square, while internal consistency was used to ensure the internal reliability of the research instruments. Cronbach validity was used to validate the Likert scale items. Besides, correlation was used to find out the relationships between the dependent and independent variables. The researcher obtained approval from the faculty of education and permission from NARCOSTI to collect data from the respondents.
Findings: The research findings revealed that independent variables, eLearning benefits, eLearning resources, eLearning incentives, and eLearning integration contribute to students’ learning process. The research further revealed that the introduction of a favorable and supportive eLearning environment positively influences Students’ Learning Processes. The researcher concluded that eLearning contributes to the effective learning process of students, therefore, is imperative to be embraced.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The researcher recommended that the government, curriculum developers and IHL focus on Instructional design, build a strong Learning management system, guidelines and policy, comparative analysis, leverage Cultural and Global perspectives, eLearning accessibility, engagement, Assessment and evaluation of the eLearning platform. Besides, the students subscribing to the eLearning platform should be given proper orientation in order to navigate the platform easily.
Downloads
References
Avouris, N. (2001). Website evaluation: A usability-based perspective. In Advances in Informatics (pp. 217-231).
Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., and Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st century skills and learning environments for middle school youth. Int. J. Sch. Soc. Work 1. doi: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
Bates, A. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. OER at https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/221.
Costabile, M.F. et al. (2005). January. On the usability evaluation of e-learning applications. In System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii
Dhar, D. and Yammiyavar, P. (2012). Design approach for e-learning systems: Should it be user centered or learner centered. In Technology for Education (T4E), 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on (pp. 239-240).
Eksail, F.A.A. and Afari, E. (2020). Factors affecting trainee lecturers’ intention to use technology: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2681–2697.
Frydenberg, J. (2002). Quality standards in eLearning: A matrix of analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(2).
Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Amla Salleh. (2012). Management strategies for E-Learning system as the core component of systemic change: A qualitative analysis. Life Science Journal, 9(3), 2190-2196.
Ghavifekr, S., & Sufean Hussin. (2011). Managing Systemic Change in a Technology-based Education System: A Malaysian Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 455-464.
Gillham, B. (2008) Developing a questionnaire. A&C Black yrian EFL lecturers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-398.
Gregory, J., & Salmon, G. (2013). Professional development for online university teaching. Distance Education, 34(3), 256–270.
Goi, C.L. and Ng, P.Y. (2009). E-learning in Malaysia: Success factors in implementing e-learning program. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), pp.237- 246.
Gunga, S.O. and Ricketts, I.W. (2007). Facing the challenges of e‐learning initiatives in African universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), pp.896-906.
Gu, Q. and Sumner, T. (2006). Support personalization in distributed e-learning systems through learner modeling. In Information and Communication Technologies, 2006. ICTTA'06. 2nd (Vol. 1, pp. 610-615).
Harasim, L. (2012) Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge. International Journal of English and Education ISSN: 2278-4012, Volume:10, Issue:1,
Herselman, M.E. (2003). ICT in rural areas in South Africa: various case studies. Informing Science Proceedings, Tinio,. ICT in Education. pp.945-955.
Houwer, J. (2009) The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for
association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1-20.
Hughes, C. (1992). Developing learning‐centered trainers and tutors. Studies in Continuing Education, 14(1), pp.14-27.
Makokha, G. L., & Mutisya, D. N. (2016). Status of E-Learning in Public Universities in Kenya. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3).
Meshkat, M., Rezaee, M., & Jafari, M. (2011). Information technology in education. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 369-373.
Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Jokela, T. et el. (2003). The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. In Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 53-60).
Lam, P. et al. (2011). Students’ use of eLearning strategies and their perceptions of eLearning usefulness. Global Learn Asia Pacific, pp.1379-1388
Kapur, Radhika. (2018) Education in India. (n.d.). Retrieved November 07, 2018 from
http://www.nios.ac.in/media/documents/SecICHCour/English/CH.18.pdf
Kalembera, L. and Majawa, F. (2015). The integration of ICTs into the learning activities of the college of medicine undergraduate students. In IST-Africa Conference, 2015 (pp. 1-10).
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology.
Könings, K.D. et al (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combinithe perspectives of designers, lecturers, and students, 75(4), pp.645-660. Retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242469851_
Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan,D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.
Educational and Psychological measurement, 30,607-610.
Mertens, D.M. (1998). Research Methods in Education and Psychology. Thousands Oak: Sage Publications.
Muller, J. (2009). Considering ICT use when energy access is not secured: A case study from rural South Africa. African Women & ICTs: investigating Technology, Gender and Empowerment, pp.33-43.
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 18(2), 34-35.
Nath, J. (2012). E-learning methodologies and its trends in modern information technology. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 3(4), pp.48-52.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asoke-Nath-4/publication/276028505
Nussbaum, S. (2011) Top 10 reasons to Use Technology in Education: ipad, Computer, Listening centers. Meet the solution Tree: Retrieved from:
https:/youtu.be/j0adCjin3o http://blog.ampli.com/2011/11/intergration.
Ogula, P. A. (1998). A Handbook of Educational Research. Nairobi; New Kermiit.
Omwenga, E., et al. (2004). A model for introducing and implementing e-learning for delivery of educational content within the African context. African Journal of Sciences and Technology, 5(1), pp.35-48. Retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Elijah- Omwenga/publication/237527384
Osborne, M. (2013). Modern learning environments. CORE Education.
Popovici, A. and Mironov, C. (2015). Students’ Perception on using eLearning Technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, pp.1514-1519.
Rekkedal, T. (2003). Student support services in e-learning. Retrieved September, 20, p.2005.
http://learning.ericsson.net/socrates/doc/norway.doc
Rinaldi, M. (2013). Perception of students towards e-learning. In Educational Media (ICEM), IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Romiszowski, A.J. (2004). How's the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs Nj-, 44(1), Pp.5-27.
Ruiz, J.G., et al. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic medicine, 81(3), pp.207-212.
Singh, A.S. and Masuku, M.B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), pp.1-22.
Singh, G. et al. (2005). A study into the effects of elearning on higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2(1), p.3.
Shittu, N.A. and Shittu, A.J.K. (2013). ICT impact assessment model: An extension of the CIPP and the Kirkpatrick models. International HETL Review, 3, p.12.
Smart, K.L. and Cappel, J.J.( 2006). Students' perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5(1), p.20119.
http://www.sciepub.com/reference/356546
Sun, P.C. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), pp.1183-1202.
Tarus, J.K. and Gichoya, D. (2014). E-Learning in Kenyan Universities: Preconditions for Successful Implementation. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 66.
Tarus, J.K., et al. (2015). Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).
Vonderwell, S. and Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in education, 38(2), pp.213-230.
Wagner, D. et al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects. A Handbook for Developing Countries. Washington DC: InfoDev/World Bank.
Wiecha, J. and Barrie, N. (2002). Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME. Academic Medicine, 77(9), pp.928-929.
Webster, M. D. (2016). Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,, 20(1), 25- 36. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.25
Zaharias, P. and Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for elearning applications: Beyond functional usability. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25(1), pp.75-98. Retrieved from:
Zhang, G. et al. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP)as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service- learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), pp.57-84. Retrieved from: https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/CIPP
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Olivia Susan Ochoo, Dr. Shem Mwalw’a, Dr. Elizabeth Nduku
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
