Beyond Echo Chambers: Unraveling the Impact of Social Media Algorithms on Consumer Behavior and Exploring Pathways to a Diverse Digital Discourse

Authors

  • Tarun Gupta Reckitt
  • Supriya Bansal Luxe Weavers

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jms.1799

Keywords:

Social Media Aligorithms, Echo Chamber Effect, Consumer Behavior, Information Dissemination, Polarization

Abstract

Purpose: This study delves into the intricate dynamics of how social media algorithms cultivate echo chambers, with a focus on their profound influence on consumer behavior.

Methodology: Through an exhaustive review of existing literature and detailed case studies, we explore the mechanisms by which personalized content delivery systems on social media platforms not only reinforce users' pre-existing beliefs and preferences but also significantly impact their consumption patterns, decision-making processes, and overall perception of reality.

Findings: Our analysis reveals that while these algorithms are designed to enhance user engagement and satisfaction, they inadvertently foster digital polarization, diminish exposure to diverse viewpoints, and contribute to the spread of misinformation. The paper further investigates the broader societal implications of these echo chambers, including decreased public trust in traditional information sources and the erosion of democratic discourse. To counteract these effects, we propose a multifaceted approach encompassing increased algorithmic transparency, user empowerment through digital literacy education, and policy interventions aimed at encouraging content diversity.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: Our recommendations are designed to mitigate the echo chamber effect and foster a more inclusive and well-informed online public sphere. By addressing these challenges, we underscore the need for a concerted effort among stakeholders"”including policymakers, educators, and technology developers"”to navigate the complexities of the digital landscape and ensure a more diverse and resilient digital environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tarun Gupta, Reckitt

Marketing

Supriya Bansal, Luxe Weavers

E-commerce

References

W. L. Bennett and S. Iyengar, “A new era of minimal effects? the changing foundations of political communication,” Journal of Communication, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 707–731, Dec.2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1460-466.2008.00410.x.

C. Matasick, C. Alfonsi, and A. Bellantoni, “Governance responses to disinformation,” Aug. 2020. doi: 10.1787/d6237c85-en.

J. A. Tucker et al., “Social Media, Political polarization, and Political Disinformation: A review of the Scientific literature,” Social Science Research Network, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3144139.

S. Steensen and O. Westlund, What is Digital Journalism Studies? 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429259555.

K. O’Hara, “Digital modernity,” Foundations and Trends in Web Science, vol. 9, no. 1–2, pp. 1–254, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1561/1800000031.

N. Anstead and B. O’Loughlin, “Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK General Election,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 204– 220, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12102.

P. Hodkinson, “Bedrooms and beyond: Youth, identity and privacy on social network sites,” New Media & Society, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 272–288, Jul. 2016, doi:10.1177/1461444815605454.

C. W. Tong et al., “Storytelling and Visualization: an extended survey,” Information, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 65, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.3390/info9030065.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Opinion Paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 71, p. 102642, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 57, p. 101994, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 57, p. 101994, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.

H. T. P. Williams, J. R. McMurray, T. Kurz, and F. H. Lambert, “Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 32, pp. 126–138, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006.

J. Keane, Democracy and media decadence. 2013. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107300767.

E. Fajardo, “Covid-19, una pandemia acompañada de infodemia,” Global Rheumatology, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.46856/grp.26.e029.

S. Wolfert, L. Ge, C. N. Verdouw, and M. J. Bogaardt, “Big Data in Smart Farming – A review,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 153, pp. 69–80, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023.

J. A. Tucker et al., “Social Media, Political polarization, and Political Disinformation: A review of the Scientific literature,” Social Science Research Network, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3144139.

G. Falloon, “From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2449–2472, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4.

Gruzd and J. Roy, “Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective,” Policy & Internet, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 28–45, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.poi354.

M. Stocchetti, The Digital Age and its Discontents: Critical Reflections in Education. 2020. doi: 10.33134/hup-4.

L. Gurrieri, R. Gordon, J. Barraket, A. Joyce, and C. Green, “Social marketing and social movements: creating inclusive social change coalitions,” Journal of Social Marketing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 354–377, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1108/jsocm-12-2016-0078.

D. Jannach and C. Bauer, “Escaping the McNamara Fallacy: Toward More Impactful recommender Systems research,” Ai Magazine, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 79–95, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1609/aimag.v41i4.5312.

L. Shamseer et al., “Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation,” The BMJ, vol. 349, no. jan02 1, p. g7647, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.

C. Voinea, C. Vică, E. Mihailov, and J. Savulescu, “The internet as cognitive enhancement,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2345–2362, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00210-8.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 57, p. 101994, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 63, p. 102456, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456.

K. Sørensen et al., “Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration

of definitions and models,” BMC Public Health, vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.

M. Slater and M. V. Sánchez-Vives, “Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 3, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00074.

M. Nicola et al., “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID19): A review,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, pp. 185–193, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018.

C. C. White, “Wielding social media in the Cyber-Arena: Globalism, nationalism, and civic education,” Research in Social Sciences and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.46303/ressat.05.01.1.

E. G. Carr et al., “Positive behavior support,” Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 4–16, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1177/109830070200400102.

P. Bourdieu, “The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason,” Social Science Information, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 19–47, Dec. 1975, doi: 10.1177/053901847501400602.

C. Folke, T. P. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg, “ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 441–473, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.

A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1109/comst.2015.2444095.

J. K. Heimbach et al., “AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 358–380, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1002/hep.29086

Downloads

Published

2024-04-07

How to Cite

Gupta, T., & Bansal, S. (2024). Beyond Echo Chambers: Unraveling the Impact of Social Media Algorithms on Consumer Behavior and Exploring Pathways to a Diverse Digital Discourse. Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.47941/jms.1799

Issue

Section

Articles