Efficient Water Management through Intelligent Digital Twins
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jts.2036Keywords:
Digital Twin, Water management, Water Consumption, Markov Decision Process (Mdp)Abstract
Purpose: Supplying and distributing fresh water to large populations is a significant global issue. In addition to the challenges posed by its scarcity and wastage, this essential resource is increasingly vulnerable due to adverse environmental conditions. Consequently, there is an urgent need for novel approaches to ensure the optimal, equitable, and efficient utilization of fresh water. The emergence of new technologies offers promising prospects for achieving this goal. One such technology, the digital twin, is gaining considerable attention from both academic and industrial communities. This attention is primarily driven by the anticipated benefits it offers across various sectors, including process optimization, cost reduction, and accelerated time to market.
Methodology: In the realm of water management, numerous solutions are being proposed, particularly aimed at detecting leaks and assessing water assets under diverse operational conditions. However, these solutions often lack sufficient intelligence and autonomy throughout the entire data acquisition and processing cycle, as well as in asset control and service provision. To address this gap, we propose a new framework in this paper, based on multi-agent systems and the digital twin paradigm.
Findings: Our multi-agent system is tasked with conducting data analytics to evaluate water consumption and delivering relevant feedback to users. This includes implementing a rewarding system to incentivize appropriate pricing policies. Additionally, the system simulates asset operations under specific constraints to facilitate the detection of failures or defects.
Unique Contribution to theory, practice and policy: We propose employing Markov Decision Process (MDP), a mathematical framework for decision-making, to model water consumption behaviors.
Downloads
References
Boschert, S.—Rosen, R.: Digital Twin – The Simulation Aspect. In: Hehenberger, P., Bradley, D. (Eds.): Mechatronic Futures. Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 59–74, doi: 10.1007/978-3-31932156-1 5.
Rasheed, A.—San, O.—Kvamsdal, T.: Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers from a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 21980–22012,doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143.
Lu, Y.—Liu, C.—Wang, K. I-K.—Huang, H.—Xu, X.: Digital Twin-Driven Smart Manufacturing: Connotation, Reference Model, Applications and Research Issues. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 61, 2020, Art. No. 101837, doi:
1016/j.rcim.2019.101837.
Cimino, C.—Negri, E.—Fumagalli, L.: Review of Digital Twin Applications in Manufacturing. Computers in Industry, Vol. 113, 2019, Art. No. 103130, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130.
Tao, F.—Zhang, M.—Nee, A. Y. C.: Chapter 1 – Background and Concept of Digital Twin. In: Tao, F., Zhang, M., Nee, A. Y. C.: Digital Twin Driven Smart Manufacturing. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019, pp. 3–28, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817630-6.00001-1.
Gartner Inc.: 5 Trends Emerge in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. 2018, Available online: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5- trends-emerge-in-gartnerhype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2018/, accessed on 18 March 2020.
Therrien, J.-D.—Nicola¨ı, N.—Vanrolleghem, P. A.: A Critical Review of the Data Pipeline: How Wastewater System Operation Flows from Data to Intelligence. Water Science and Technology, Vol. 82, 2020, No. 12, pp. 2613–2634, doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.393.
Rittmann, B. E.—Boltz, J. P.—Brockmann, D.—Daigger, G.T.— Morgenroth, E.—Sørensen, K.H.—Tak´acs, I.—van Loosdrecht, M. C.M.—Vanrolleghem, P. A.: A Framework for Good Biofilm Reactor Modeling Practice (GBRMP). Water Science and Technology, Vol. 77, 2018, No. 5, pp. 1149–1164, doi: 10.2166/wst.2018.021.
Varga, E.—Hauduc, H.—Barnard, J.—Dunlap, P.—Jimenez, J.—Menniti, A.—Schauer, P.— Lopez Vazquez, C.M.—Gu, A. Z.— Sperandio, M.—Tak´acs, I.: Recent Advances in Bio-P Modelling – A New Approach Verified by Full-Scale Observations. Water Science and Technology, Vol. 78, 2018, No. 10, pp. 2119–2130, doi: 10.2166/wst.2018.490.
Solon, K.—Flores-Alsina, X.—Kazadi Mbamba, C.—Ikumi, D.— Volcke, E. I.P.— Vaneeckhaute, C.—Ekama, G.—Vanrolleghem, P.A.— Batstone, D. J.—Gernaey, K. V.— Jeppsson, U.: Plant-Wide Modelling of Phosphorus Transformations in Wastewater Treatment Systems: Impacts of Control and Operational Strategies. Water Research, Vol. 113, 2017, pp. 97–110, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.007.
Revollar, S.—Vilanova, R.—Vega, P.—Francisco, M.—Meneses, M.: Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation: Simple Control Schemes with a Holistic Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 12, 2020, No. 3, Art. No. 768, doi: 10.3390/su12030768.
Lin, J.—Sedigh, S.—Miller, A.: Towards Integrated Simulation of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Case Study on Intelligent Water Distribution. 2009 8th IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing (DASC2009), 2009, pp. 690–695, doi: 10.1109/DASC.2009.140.
Kartakis, S.—Abraham, E.—McCann, J. A.: WaterBox: A Testbed for Monitoring and Controlling Smart Water Networks. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on
Cyber-Physical Systems for Smart Water Networks (CySWater’15), 2015, Art. No. 8, doi:
1145/2738935.2738939.
IWA and Xylem Inc.: Digital Water Report. Technical Report, 2019, London, UK,p. 44.
International Water Association – IWA: Webinars Organized by the International Water Association, https://iwa-network.org/.
Feraud, M.—Galland, S.: First Comparison of SARL to Other Agent-Programming Languages and Frameworks. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 109,2017, pp. 1080–1085, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.389.
Conejos Fuertes, P.—Mart´ınez Alzamora, F.—Herv´as Carot, M.—Alonso Campos, J. C.:
Development and Use of a Digital Twin for the Water Supply and Distribution Network of Valencia (Spain). 17th International Computing and Control for the Water Industry Conference, Exeter, UK, 2019.
Almeida, A.—Azkune, G.: Predicting Human Behaviour with Recurrent Neural Networks. Applied Sciences, Vol. 8, 2018, No. 2, Art. No. 305, doi: 10.3390/app8020305.
Meng, C.—Wang, X.—Li, Y.: An Optimization Model for Water Management Based on Water Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacities: A Case Study of the Yinma River Basin, Northeast China. Water, Vol. 10, 2018, No. 5, Art. No. 565, doi: 10.3390/w10050565.
Fu, Z. H.—Zhao, H.J.—Wang, H.—Lu, W.T.—Wang, J.—Guo, H. C.: Integrated Planning for Regional Development Planning and Water Resources Management under Uncertainty: A Case Study of Xining, China. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 554, 2017, pp. 623–634, ISSN 00221694, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.022.
Berger, T.—Birner, R.—D´ıaz, J.—McCarthy, N.—Wittmer, H.: Capturing the Complexity ofWater Uses andWater Users Within a Multi-Agent Framework. In: Craswell, E., Bonnell, M., Bossio, D., Demuth, S., Van De Giesen, N. (Eds.): Integrated Assessment of Water Resources and Global Change. Springer, Dordrecht, 2006, pp. 129–148, doi: 10.1007/978-14020-5591-1 9.
Giuliani, M.—Castelletti, A.—Amigoni, F.—Cai, X.: Multiagent Systems and Distributed Constraint Reasoning for Regulatory Mechanism Design in Water Management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 141, 2015,No. 4, Art. No. 04014068, doi:
1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000463.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siva Sathyanarayana Movva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
