A Nano-encapsulated Seven-strain Microbial Biostimulant improves Nutrient-use Efficiency, Soil Health and Crop Productivity across Contrasting Soil Orders: An Integrated Laboratory, Greenhouse and Multi-site Field Validation

Authors

  • Shad AM Serroune Aiden Digital Labs USA LLC, Wyoming, USA & Nanogeios Laboratory USA LLC, Wyoming, USA.
  • Olivia Mary Kessler Aiden Digital Labs USA LLC, Wyoming, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijbs.3964

Keywords:

Nano-Encapsulation, Microbial Biostimulant, Chitosan Nanocarrier, Nitrogen-Use Efficiency, Soil Health

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the agronomic performance, stability, soil-health effects and climate-resilience potential of a nano-encapsulated microbial biostimulant designed to improve fertilizer-use efficiency and reduce nutrient losses. The formulation combined a seven-strain microbial consortium with a chitosan nanocarrier co-loaded with molybdenum, silicon and plant-growth regulators.

Methodology: A fully integrated 12-month laboratory, greenhouse and multi-site field evaluation was conducted. The microbial consortium comprised Lactobacillus plantarum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus subtilis, Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense at ≥1 × 10⁹ CFU mL⁻¹. Physicochemical characterization, storage-stability testing, freeze–thaw cycling, soil microcosm studies, greenhouse stress assays and replicated randomized field trials across three soil orders were performed. Root-architecture imaging, 16S rRNA profiling, principal component analysis and economic modelling were also used to validate the results.

Findings: The nanoparticles had a mean size of 150 ± 20 nm, a polydispersity index below 0.3 and component encapsulation efficiencies of 78–91%, with diffusion-controlled release over 30–60 days. The formulation maintained 1.2–2.8 × 10⁹ CFU mL⁻¹ across 4–40 °C for 12 months and remained stable during freeze–thaw cycling. Grain yield increased by 14% in winter wheat, 22% in soybean and 31% in corn under deficit irrigation. Nitrogen-use efficiency improved by 28%, while fertilizer application was reduced by 25% without yield loss. Nitrate and phosphate leaching declined by 52% and 47%, respectively, in sandy soils. In acidic soil, pH increased by 0.4 units and exchangeable aluminium decreased by 48%. Microbial biomass carbon increased by 35–145%, while soil organic matter increased by 0.5–0.6% within one growing season. Under drought, heat and salinity stress, plants retained 75–82% of their growth and photosynthetic efficiency.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy (Recommendations): The study demonstrates that combining beneficial microorganisms, micronutrients and plant-growth regulators within a controlled-release chitosan nanocarrier can simultaneously improve crop productivity, nutrient-use efficiency, soil biological activity and tolerance to environmental stress. The findings provide soil-specific deployment pathways for farmers, agricultural industries and extension services. The technology is recommended as a scalable strategy for reducing fertilizer dependence, limiting nutrient pollution, restoring degraded soils and strengthening climate-resilient agricultural production. Field validation across additional crops, soil types and agroecological regions is recommended before large-scale commercialization and policy adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adesemoye, A. O., Torbert, H. A. & Kloepper, J. W. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecology 58, 921–929 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y

Backer, R., Rokem, J. S., Ilangumaran, G. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1473 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473

Bhardwaj, D., Ansari, M. W., Sahoo, R. K. & Tuteja, N. Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microbial Cell Factories 13, 66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-66

Calabi-Floody, M., Medina, J., Rumpel, C. et al. Smart fertilizers as a strategy for sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 147, 119–157 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.003

Calvo, P., Nelson, L. & Kloepper, J. W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil 383, 3–41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8

Cassán, F., Coniglio, A., López, G. et al. Everything you must know about Azospirillum and its impact on agriculture and beyond. Biology and Fertility of Soils 56, 461–479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01463-y

du Jardin, P. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae 196, 3–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021

Etesami, H. & Jeong, B. R. Silicon (Si): review and future prospects on the action mechanisms in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 147, 881–896 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.063

Glick, B. R. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012, 963401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401

Hungria, M., Nogueira, M. A. & Araujo, R. S. Inoculation of Brachiaria spp. with the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense: an environment-friendly component in the reclamation of degraded pastures in the tropics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 221, 125–131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.024

Kansas Geological Survey. Groundwater levels fall across western and south-central Kansas; High Plains (Ogallala) aquifer annual water-level change (KGS, University of Kansas, 2024–2025). https://kgs.ku.edu

Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy. Wheat production and soil management in Kansas (K-State Research and Extension, 2024). https://www.agronomy.k-state.edu/extension/crop-production/wheat/

Kashyap, P. L., Xiang, X. & Heiden, P. Chitosan nanoparticle based delivery systems for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 77, 36–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.039

Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123, 1–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032

Larimer, F. W., Chain, P., Hauser, L., Lamerdin, J., Malfatti, S., Do, L., ... & Harwood, C. S. (2004). Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Nature biotechnology, 22(1), 55-61.

Liu, R. & Lal, R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment 514, 131–139 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104

Ma, J. F. & Yamaji, N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science 11, 392–397 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.007.

Mus, F., Alleman, A. B., Pence, N., Seefeldt, L. C., & Peters, J. W. (2018). Exploring the alternatives of biological nitrogen fixation. Metallomics, 10(4), 523-538.

Sah, S., Krishnani, S., & Singh, R. (2021). Pseudomonas mediated nutritional and growth promotional activities for sustainable food security. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 2, 100084.

Schütz, L., Gattinger, A., Meier, M. et al. Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization — a global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 2204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02204.

Serroune, S. A. & Inthasak, S. Impact of nano-enabled multi-strain biofertilizer on crop productivity and soil health in Karst Agroforestry Systems of Vang Vieng, Laos PDR. International Journal of Science and Research Archive 13(2), 4026–4083 (2024). https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2651

Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. & Denef, K. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research 79, 7–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008

Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108

U.S. Global Change Research Program / NOAA Climate.gov. National Climate Assessment: Great Plains and the Ogallala (High Plains) Aquifer; regional precipitation and climate normals (2024–2025). https://www.climate.gov

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Kansas Crop Production 2024 Annual Summary and State Agriculture Overview (USDA NASS, 2025). https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=KANSAS

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Kansas state soil: Harney series (Mollisol); Soil Taxonomy and the twelve soil orders (NRCS, 2022). https://www.nrcs.usda.gov

Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S. & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability — a review. Molecules 21, 573 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050573

Zhang, F., Cui, Z., Chen, X. et al. Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Advances in Agronomy 116, 1–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394277-7.00001-4

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08

How to Cite

Serroune, S. A., & Kessler, O. M. (2026). A Nano-encapsulated Seven-strain Microbial Biostimulant improves Nutrient-use Efficiency, Soil Health and Crop Productivity across Contrasting Soil Orders: An Integrated Laboratory, Greenhouse and Multi-site Field Validation. International Journal of Biological Studies, 6(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijbs.3964

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.