A Nano-encapsulated Seven-strain Microbial Biostimulant improves Nutrient-use Efficiency, Soil Health and Crop Productivity across Contrasting Soil Orders: An Integrated Laboratory, Greenhouse and Multi-site Field Validation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijbs.3964Keywords:
Nano-Encapsulation, Microbial Biostimulant, Chitosan Nanocarrier, Nitrogen-Use Efficiency, Soil HealthAbstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the agronomic performance, stability, soil-health effects and climate-resilience potential of a nano-encapsulated microbial biostimulant designed to improve fertilizer-use efficiency and reduce nutrient losses. The formulation combined a seven-strain microbial consortium with a chitosan nanocarrier co-loaded with molybdenum, silicon and plant-growth regulators.
Methodology: A fully integrated 12-month laboratory, greenhouse and multi-site field evaluation was conducted. The microbial consortium comprised Lactobacillus plantarum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus subtilis, Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense at ≥1 × 10⁹ CFU mL⁻¹. Physicochemical characterization, storage-stability testing, freeze–thaw cycling, soil microcosm studies, greenhouse stress assays and replicated randomized field trials across three soil orders were performed. Root-architecture imaging, 16S rRNA profiling, principal component analysis and economic modelling were also used to validate the results.
Findings: The nanoparticles had a mean size of 150 ± 20 nm, a polydispersity index below 0.3 and component encapsulation efficiencies of 78–91%, with diffusion-controlled release over 30–60 days. The formulation maintained 1.2–2.8 × 10⁹ CFU mL⁻¹ across 4–40 °C for 12 months and remained stable during freeze–thaw cycling. Grain yield increased by 14% in winter wheat, 22% in soybean and 31% in corn under deficit irrigation. Nitrogen-use efficiency improved by 28%, while fertilizer application was reduced by 25% without yield loss. Nitrate and phosphate leaching declined by 52% and 47%, respectively, in sandy soils. In acidic soil, pH increased by 0.4 units and exchangeable aluminium decreased by 48%. Microbial biomass carbon increased by 35–145%, while soil organic matter increased by 0.5–0.6% within one growing season. Under drought, heat and salinity stress, plants retained 75–82% of their growth and photosynthetic efficiency.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy (Recommendations): The study demonstrates that combining beneficial microorganisms, micronutrients and plant-growth regulators within a controlled-release chitosan nanocarrier can simultaneously improve crop productivity, nutrient-use efficiency, soil biological activity and tolerance to environmental stress. The findings provide soil-specific deployment pathways for farmers, agricultural industries and extension services. The technology is recommended as a scalable strategy for reducing fertilizer dependence, limiting nutrient pollution, restoring degraded soils and strengthening climate-resilient agricultural production. Field validation across additional crops, soil types and agroecological regions is recommended before large-scale commercialization and policy adoption.
Downloads
References
Adesemoye, A. O., Torbert, H. A. & Kloepper, J. W. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecology 58, 921–929 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y
Backer, R., Rokem, J. S., Ilangumaran, G. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1473 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473
Bhardwaj, D., Ansari, M. W., Sahoo, R. K. & Tuteja, N. Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microbial Cell Factories 13, 66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-66
Calabi-Floody, M., Medina, J., Rumpel, C. et al. Smart fertilizers as a strategy for sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 147, 119–157 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.003
Calvo, P., Nelson, L. & Kloepper, J. W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil 383, 3–41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
Cassán, F., Coniglio, A., López, G. et al. Everything you must know about Azospirillum and its impact on agriculture and beyond. Biology and Fertility of Soils 56, 461–479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01463-y
du Jardin, P. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae 196, 3–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
Etesami, H. & Jeong, B. R. Silicon (Si): review and future prospects on the action mechanisms in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 147, 881–896 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.063
Glick, B. R. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012, 963401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
Hungria, M., Nogueira, M. A. & Araujo, R. S. Inoculation of Brachiaria spp. with the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense: an environment-friendly component in the reclamation of degraded pastures in the tropics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 221, 125–131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.024
Kansas Geological Survey. Groundwater levels fall across western and south-central Kansas; High Plains (Ogallala) aquifer annual water-level change (KGS, University of Kansas, 2024–2025). https://kgs.ku.edu
Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy. Wheat production and soil management in Kansas (K-State Research and Extension, 2024). https://www.agronomy.k-state.edu/extension/crop-production/wheat/
Kashyap, P. L., Xiang, X. & Heiden, P. Chitosan nanoparticle based delivery systems for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 77, 36–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.039
Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123, 1–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032
Larimer, F. W., Chain, P., Hauser, L., Lamerdin, J., Malfatti, S., Do, L., ... & Harwood, C. S. (2004). Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Nature biotechnology, 22(1), 55-61.
Liu, R. & Lal, R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment 514, 131–139 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104
Ma, J. F. & Yamaji, N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science 11, 392–397 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.007.
Mus, F., Alleman, A. B., Pence, N., Seefeldt, L. C., & Peters, J. W. (2018). Exploring the alternatives of biological nitrogen fixation. Metallomics, 10(4), 523-538.
Sah, S., Krishnani, S., & Singh, R. (2021). Pseudomonas mediated nutritional and growth promotional activities for sustainable food security. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 2, 100084.
Schütz, L., Gattinger, A., Meier, M. et al. Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization — a global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 2204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02204.
Serroune, S. A. & Inthasak, S. Impact of nano-enabled multi-strain biofertilizer on crop productivity and soil health in Karst Agroforestry Systems of Vang Vieng, Laos PDR. International Journal of Science and Research Archive 13(2), 4026–4083 (2024). https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2651
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. & Denef, K. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research 79, 7–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108
U.S. Global Change Research Program / NOAA Climate.gov. National Climate Assessment: Great Plains and the Ogallala (High Plains) Aquifer; regional precipitation and climate normals (2024–2025). https://www.climate.gov
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Kansas Crop Production 2024 Annual Summary and State Agriculture Overview (USDA NASS, 2025). https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=KANSAS
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Kansas state soil: Harney series (Mollisol); Soil Taxonomy and the twelve soil orders (NRCS, 2022). https://www.nrcs.usda.gov
Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S. & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability — a review. Molecules 21, 573 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050573
Zhang, F., Cui, Z., Chen, X. et al. Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Advances in Agronomy 116, 1–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394277-7.00001-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shad AM Serroune, Olivia Mary Kessler

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.