Algorithm of Trauma-Informed Tattooing: Client-Centered Decision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhs.3481Keywords:
Trauma-Informed Tattooing, Client-Centered Decision-Making, Medical Tattooing, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs)Abstract
Purpose: To establish a practical, step-by-step algorithm for trauma-informed tattooing that structures shared decision-making, reduces retraumatization risk, and improves patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in both studio and clinical contexts.
Methodology: Peer-reviewed literature (2011–2025) on medical and decorative tattooing, psychodermatology, and trauma-informed care was synthesized. The evidence was translated into a procedural workflow with phase-specific checklists and monitoring metrics, including a PRO-focused screening kit and implementation indicators for continuous quality improvement.
Findings: The reviewed evidence indicates that medical and reconstructive tattooing can improve satisfaction, body image, and quality of life, with low complication rates when aseptic technique and standard follow-up are used. Trauma-informed implementation is strengthened by a structured, consent-paced approach that expands client choice and control. The resulting algorithm comprises seven phases: pre-screening, environment setup, needs and goals mapping, layered informed consent, co-design with a pain plan, aseptic procedure with micro-pauses, individualized aftercare, and referral pathways. The accompanying PRO kit includes 7- and 30-day satisfaction and distress screening, along with implementation indicators to support ongoing quality improvement.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This work operationalizes trauma-informed, client-centered tattooing into an actionable workflow that studios and clinical services can adopt immediately. It advances theory by linking trauma-informed principles to observable procedural steps, supports policy by proposing measurable safeguards (checklists, PRO monitoring, referral criteria), and strengthens practice by providing standardized tools that improve consistency, safety, and real-world sustainability while defining priorities for staff training and future research.
Downloads
References
Argobi, Y., Jadaan, N. S., Alharbi, W. O., et al. (2024). A comprehensive evaluation of safety and awareness in eyebrow microblading: A cross-sectional study. Dermatology Reports, 16(4). DOI: 10.4081/dr.2024.9992
Becker, S. J. (2022). Medical tattooing for cosmetic breast surgery and breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 10(3), e4253. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004253
Becker, S. J., & Cassisi, D. B. (2021). Applications of medical tattooing: A systematic review of patient satisfaction outcomes. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum, 3(3), ojad015. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojab015
Byeon, J. Y., Kim, T. H., & Choi, H.-J. (2022). Complication after nipple–areolar complex tattooing performed by a non-medical person: A case report. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10(34), 12781–12786. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12781
Chang, M. W., et al. (2025). A scoping review of trauma-informed care in dermatology: Medical education and clinical practice. JAAD Reviews. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdrv.2025.05.002
Drost, J., Parsons, T. E., & Hohman, M. H. (2017). Dermatography (medical tattooing) for scars and skin grafts and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 19(5), 351–357. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1084
Goh, S. C., Martin, N. A., Pandya, A. N., & Cutress, R. I. (2011). Patient satisfaction after nipple–areola complex reconstruction and dermal tattooing after breast reconstruction. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 37(6), 527–532. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.008
Haller, C. N., et al. (2022). Reducing anxiety and preventing trauma in pediatric dermatology. Pediatric Dermatology. DOI: 10.1111/pde.14951
Hammond, J. B., Teven, C. M., Bernard, R. W., Lucas, H. D., Casey, W. J., Kruger, E. A., & Rebecca, A. M. (2021). 3D nipple–areolar tattoo: Its technique, outcomes, and utilization. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45(3), 977–983. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01967-w
Liew, S., Wu, W. T.-L., Chan, H. H.-L., et al. (2020). Understanding and treating different patient archetypes in aesthetic medicine: The art of tailored consultation. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13227
Maxwell, A., Dunklin, D., Klaus, M., Brown, L., & Leat, S. (2023). The tattoo environment as a therapeutic healing space for survivors of sexual violence. Deviant Behavior. DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2250052
Maxwell, A., Leat, S., et al. (2020). A qualitative examination of tattoo motivations for survivors of sexual violence. Deviant Behavior. DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2019.1565524
Prato, E. B., Cartier, H., Margara, A., Molina, B., Tateo, A., Grimolizzi, F., & Spagnolo, A. G. (2024). The ethical foundations of patient-centered care in aesthetic medicine. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 19(1), 1. DOI: 10.1186/s13010-024-00151-1
Smallman, J., Trevatt, A. E., & Gandhi, A. (2018). Does nipple–areolar tattooing matter in breast reconstruction? A prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of nipple–areolar tattooing on patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction. JPRAS Open, 17, 9–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2018.01.001
Tomita, S., Mori, K., & Yamazaki, H. (2021). A survey on the safety of and patient satisfaction after nipple–areola tattooing. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45(3), 968–974. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-02018-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kseniia Oliinyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
