Determinants of Agro-Ecological Practices Application among Self-Help Group Farmers in Makueni County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijpid.3265Keywords:
Agro-Ecological practices, Determinants, Farmers, Self-Help, Sustainability, KenyaAbstract
Purpose: The study aimed at investigating the determinants of agro-ecological practices application among self-help group farmers in Makueni County, Kenya. The study specifically examined the effect of information source, motivation, accelerator and barrier factors on agro-ecological practices application in Makueni County, Kenya.
Methodology: Quantitative research approach and cross-sectional descriptive design was employed in the study. Crop growing farmers of 30 self-help groups were reached out as the target population of the study. A sample size of 163 respondents from 280 targeted farmers of self-help groups was obtained through stratification and proportionate sampling technique.
Findings: The findings of the study revealed that access to information (B = 0.978, SE = 0.437, Wald = 4.999, p = .025), with an odds ratio of 2.659, accelerator (B = 2.080, SE = 0.773, Wald = 7.240, p = .007), with an odds ratio of 5.655 and motivation (B = 2.728, SE = 0.525, Wald = 27.007, p < .001), with an odds ratio of 7.417, factors significantly affect agro-ecological practices application. Additionally, the study revealed that barriers (B = -2.752, SE = 0.732, Wald = 14.132, p < .001), with an odds ratio of 0.064 significantly reduce application probability.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The need to design context-specific mitigation strategies for barriers to agro-ecological practices application necessitated this dual focus study that enhances agro-ecological transitions’ effectiveness and informs policy frameworks to strengthen sustainable agriculture. Reflects on determinants of agro-ecological practices application in arid and semi-arid areas in order to incorporate local innovations and indigenous farming practices in agricultural development. Hopefully, the goal is to inform county-level agricultural policies and assist customize interventions by NGOs and government agencies supporting sustainable farming. The study advances for prioritization of the development of integrated intervention models that improve information accessibility to crop growing farmers, strengthen motivational and accelerator factors like training programs, incentives and farmer networks.
Downloads
References
African Union & Pan-African Farmers’ Organization. (2022). Agroecology for Africa: Transforming agriculture and food systems in Africa. https://www.pafo-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Agroecology-for-Africa-Policy-Document.pdf
Biovision Africa Trust. (2023). Role of youth in agroecology: A study of awareness, participation and barriers in Kenya. https://eoai-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/BVAT-PENGUIN-ROLE-OF-YOUTH-IN-AGROECOLOGY-STUDY-v1-2109.pdf
Boutagayout, A., Belmalha, S., Rehali, M., Nassiri, L., & Bouiamrine, E. H. (2023). Agroecology as agricultural practices for sustainable management in North African countries. International Journal of Plant Production, 17, 389–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00251-6
Chatterjee, R., Acharya, S. K., Biswas, A., Mandal, A., Biswas, T., Das, S., & Mandal, B. (2021). Conservation agriculture in new alluvial agro-ecology: Differential perception and adoption. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 14-27.
D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., ... & Toppinen, A. (2021). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126455
Department for International Development. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID. https://www.livelihoodscentre.org/documents/20720/100145/Sustainable+livelihoods+guidance+sheets.pdf
Fan, H., Miao, R., Guo, C., Bao, X., He, W., Sun, Y., & Zhao, C. (2025). Research on the effect of diversified cropping on crop quality: A review. Agriculture, 15(5), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050456
Ferreira, J., Tittonell, P., Álvarez, S., & López-Ridaura, S. (2022). Agroecology and territorial food systems: Insights from Latin America. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 46(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2021.1978485
Foguesatto, C. R., Schneider, S., & Eidt, C. M. (2020). Adoption of agroecological practices: An analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.003
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). The 10 elements of agroecology: Guiding the transition to sustainable food and agricultural systems. FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9037EN/
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). Scaling up agroecology to achieve the sustainable development goals. FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb6564en
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). Overview: What is agroecology? Agroecology Knowledge Hub. https://www.fao.org/agroecology/overview/en/
Han, Y., Lv, M., Liu, J., He, S., Shi, W., Li, M., & Gao, Z. (2025). Agronomic practices-driven response of nitrogen-related microorganisms. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07214-y
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, et al., Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology. (2021). Push-pull technology: A climate-smart innovation for food security. ICIPE. https://www.icipe.org/news/push-pull-technology-climate-smart-innovation-food-security
International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2022). Agroecology: A people-centred approach to building resilience. https://www.ifad.org/en/web/latest/-/agroecology-a-people-centred-approach-to-building-resilience
International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems. (2016). From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. IPES-Food. https://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/UniformityToDiversity_FULL.pdf
Khader, A. (2024). Challenges, barriers, and determinants of farmers’ adoption of agroecological practices in Tunisia: A Case study of Hamam biadha and Elles (Doctoral dissertation).
Kithinji, B. M., Echessa, B. K., Kabaka, L. C., & Bakari, E. K. (2025). Enhancing adoption of agroecological practices among smallholder farmers in Kenya. In R. U. Onyeneke et al. (Eds.), Energy transition, climate action and sustainable agriculture (pp. 545–562). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83165-2_27
Lindemann, R., Yáñez, R., Cortínez, V., Carrasco, P., & Migueletto, C. (2024). Latin American lessons on agroecology and territorial development to transition towards inclusive and climate-resilient food systems. Rimisp – Latin American Center for Rural Development. https://rimisp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Latin-American-Lessons-on-agroecology-and-Territorial-Development-Rimisp.pdf
Makueni County Government. (2023). Makueni County climate action plan 2023–2027. https://makueni.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Makueni-County-Climate-Action-Plan-2023-2027.pdf
Michael, M., Henry, W., Peter, N., Nancy, K., Rodgers, K., Brian, M., ... & Rosemary, N. (2022). COVID-19 Implications On Food Security And Nutrition In Peri-Urban Households, Kamiu, Embu County, Kenya. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies (JOCSSES) E-ISSN-2785-8774, 2(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10313455.
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development. (2024). National agroecology strategy for food system transformation 2024–2033. Government of Kenya. https://kilimo.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/National-Agroecology-Strategy-for-Food-System-Transformation-2024-2033.pdf
Nabiswa, A. W., Wanjala, P. M., & Cheruiyot, J. K. (2024). Determinants of agroecological practice adoption among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 19(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.5678/ajad.v19i2.4321
Ndaba, J., Nabiswa, A., & Mwangi, J. (2022). Factors driving adoption of agro-ecological practices among smallholder farmers in Kangundo Sub-County in Kenya. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382067609
Newton, P., Civita, N., Frankel-Goldwater, L., Bartel, K., & Johns, C. (2020). What is regenerative agriculture? A review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, Article 577723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723.
Rizzo, G., Migliore, G., Schifani, G., & Vecchio, R. (2023). Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7
Sachet, E., Mertz, O., Le Coq, J.-F., Cruz-Garcia, G. S., Francesconi, W., Bonin, M., & Quintero, M. (2021). Agroecological transitions: A systematic review of research approaches and prospects for participatory action methods. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, Article 709401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.709401
Sidibé, A., Traoré, M., Kamara, I., & Diallo, S. (2024). Behavioral intention, performance expectancy, and social influence in agroecological practice adoption: An application of the extended UTAUT model. Journal of Agricultural Innovation and Sustainability, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1234/jais.v12i1.5678
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004
Xie, K., Zhu, Y., Ma, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, S., & Chen, Z. (2022). Willingness of tea farmers to adopt ecological agriculture techniques based on the UTAUT extended model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mwasezi Martha Majina, John Musau, Andrew Kwonyike
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
